Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

Rivera talks minority hiring and Cam Newton (Florio criticizes)


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
114 replies to this topic

#109 Guest_BlueBoy_*

Guest_BlueBoy_*
Guests

Posted 20 February 2013 - 01:15 AM

No they don't, and no they haven't.

The truth is that Egypt was one of the first true "melting pot" societies. There has been no proven "original" ancestry to Egypt. Historically, Egyptians carry genetics from sub-Saharan, to Persian and everything in between. There was neolithic expansion in both the Middle East and Africa that worked to comprise "Egypt". I don't know what fuging studies you're reading but it's not based on any sort of fact.

Egypt was never a melting pot. At least no genetic research ever prove it was. There were always two egypt. Pre-arabic invasion where they were homogeneously black Africans and post-arabic invasions where the arabs mass murdered, enslaved, push the homogeneous black africans to take refuge outside egypt. Even to this day arabs hate those monuments because they believe they're against islamic practices. Ancient Egypt and Ancient Nubia had similar culture thus they got along quite well because they were similar people. Multiculturalism never work and never will.

#110 Floppin

Floppin

    Smooches

  • Joined: 10-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,959
  • Reputation: 3,472
HUDDLER

Posted 20 February 2013 - 07:09 AM

I already addressed Ramses III. He was the LAST major Pharaoh of Egypt and not a representative of historical "Egyptian Antiquity". Neither do a group of 13 mummies. You're attempts at confirmation bias are fuging staggering. I even linked you a study regarding the historical y-chromosome make-up for all of Northern Africa. This isn't a racist argument and I don't really understand how the historical racial lineage of Eqypt has fug all to do with "White Power"?

Egypt was nomadically settled during the neolithic era by both eastern african groups and middle eastern groups. There was no settled "civilization" of Africans that were forced out by a neolithic invasion of Persians. Prior to the Persian wars, during the Pharaohs, the population of Egypt already primarily encompassed their genetic makeup because they descended from their cattle herding ancestry - just as their was a minority genetic contingent of Eastern/Western African nomadic descent.

#111 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,743
  • Reputation: 8,019
Moderators

Posted 20 February 2013 - 08:16 AM

i think there's more than one person posting under blueboys username.

#112 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,743
  • Reputation: 8,019
Moderators

Posted 20 February 2013 - 08:17 AM

still wondering why this poo thread is still in this forum. are all the mods on vacation?

#113 Guest_BlueBoy_*

Guest_BlueBoy_*
Guests

Posted 20 February 2013 - 10:04 AM

I already addressed Ramses III. He was the LAST major Pharaoh of Egypt and not a representative of historical "Egyptian Antiquity". Neither do a group of 13 mummies. You're attempts at confirmation bias are fuging staggering. I even linked you a study regarding the historical y-chromosome make-up for all of Northern Africa. This isn't a racist argument and I don't really understand how the historical racial lineage of Eqypt has fug all to do with "White Power"?

I stood corrected, you're now at the denial phase. How could they have a historical y-chromosome for all of North Africa when genetic testing of antiquity is in its infancy. The JML
published STRs is the latest as far as genetic testing of antiquity. The technology is rather new. I repeat, there is no such thing as a historical y-chromosome make-up of North Africa that dates back to pharaonic egypt. Ramesses & the armarna mummies results are the latest and the tip of the iceberg. And it proves thus far that the people that lived in pharaonic carries the allele E1b1a. And those people don't live there anymore. Where are they? well, playing QB for the Carolina panthers? Lol

You can disagree with opinion but you can't disagree with genetic research. Plus, any source you have that's dated before december 2012 & january 2013 is outdated. You can't refer to them anymore.

Egypt was nomadically settled during the neolithic era by both eastern african groups and middle eastern groups. There was no settled "civilization" of Africans that were forced out by a neolithic invasion of Persians. Prior to the Persian wars, during the Pharaohs, the population of Egypt already primarily encompassed their genetic makeup because they descended from their cattle herding ancestry - just as their was a minority genetic contingent of Eastern/Western African nomadic descent.

You're officially in the delusional & denial phase. Everything you just said are just guesses and opinion. If they were that concrete we wouldn't need genetic study, would we? You go with the "I believe" side and I will stick with the genetic study side.

#114 Guest_BlueBoy_*

Guest_BlueBoy_*
Guests

Posted 20 February 2013 - 10:32 AM

This isn't a racist argument and I don't really understand how the historical racial lineage of Eqypt has fug all to do with "White Power"?

White Power is centered around proving white people built everything in history and the complete 'denial' of African achievements. Don't act ignorant. You know what you're doing. They were a little successful in doing that by teaching our youth that there were some wondering caucasians in the Sahara desert building civilizations and fly back to europe to live in caves. That didn't hold long. Now you're selling me the idea that just because a black person in Africa have an African specific allele(E1b1a) doesn't mean his relatives carry the same allele? Nobody's buying what you're selling.

#115 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 48,216
  • Reputation: 15,710
SUPPORTER

Posted 20 February 2013 - 10:35 AM

i think there's more than one person posting under blueboys username.


However many there are, none of them are really contributing anything valuable.

still wondering why this poo thread is still in this forum. are all the mods on vacation?


Got me :unsure:

I know a couple are caught up in the "right to post penises" debate.

Maybe nobody's reported this crap.