Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Panthers_Lover

US government seeks to rein in executive pay

Recommended Posts

haha, you were for goverment control of what companies do with their money before you were against it.

slipperyslopetipoftheicebergFEARFEARFEARRRRRRRRR!

Relax, this is not going to happen, and if it does it will just be a suggestion or non binding - to keep reminding the CEOS that they need to at least keep up the appearance of giving a crap. many corporate leaders have been shamed into doing whats right because of negative media coverage, but once that goes away you can bet they will hop right back on the gravy train of screwing people over as early and often as possible unless there is some kind of feeback loop reminding them that they too are only human, like the rest of us.

The difference is...I can choose to use the company that pays his CEO exhorbitant amounts...USUALLY. I have no choice w/ government...and that's my/our money. You should be more outraged at government salaries that are crazy. Car allowances. Pensions. Health insurance. Per diems. Let's really cut costs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Everybody wants to be a fatcat.

Everybody hates the fatcat cuz they're jealous.

I don't resent them as much as I do the government appointed chickensh*t flunkie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The difference is...I can choose to patronize the company that pays his CEO exhorbitant amounts...USUALLY. I have no choice w/ government...and that's my/our money. You should be more outraged at government salaries that are crazy. Car allowances. Pensions. Health insurance. Per diems. Let's really cut costs.

Yes... such as the State Legislators, who were not subject to the .5% salary decrease that I was, get $107 a day per diem, a salary, another monthly travel budget of over $500, get to have "closed" sessions (overtime), and somehow never finish the budget in their 100 day legislative calendar (allowing more overtime)...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The difference is...I can choose to use the company that pays his CEO exhorbitant amounts...USUALLY. I have no choice w/ government...and that's my/our money. You should be more outraged at government salaries that are crazy. Car allowances. Pensions. Health insurance. Per diems. Let's really cut costs.

Sure, but I doubt government salaries are really that big of a chunk of the government's total expenses.

I could have lived without bailing out some of these dipshits. Throwing good money after bad far outweighs the total amount of gov't salaries.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes... such as the State Legislators, who were not subject to the .5% salary decrease that I was, get $107 a day per diem, a salary, another monthly travel budget of over $500, get to have "closed" sessions (overtime), and somehow never finish the budget in their 100 day legislative calendar (allowing more overtime)...

I say if they can't balance the budget without tax increases they are in breach of contract with their constituents and don't deserve any perks...just a base $50k salary. Sound good?

Companies lay off...so should government...it's not the job lottery.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd love to say how mad I am at government salaries, but in my view there's not a hell of a lot to be pissed about, comparatively speaking. Far more disturbing is when government employees abuse expense accounts, accept bribes....the less you pay them, the more likely they will abuse the system, and we kind of have an unhappy medium for most jobs.

CEOs pay should be more focused on performance and less on contract negotiation - I feel the same way about football players. If anything ever comes from this (doubtful anyways), it will most likely be some kind of financial disclosure issue or something similar. The government can not tell a private company how much someone can get paid and that, despite PL shivering in fear in a corner of her trailer, is not going to happen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd love to say how mad I am at government salaries, but in my view there's not a hell of a lot to be pissed about, comparatively speaking. Far more disturbing is when government employees abuse expense accounts, accept bribes....the less you pay them, the more likely they will abuse the system, and we kind of have an unhappy medium for most jobs.

CEOs pay should be more focused on performance and less on contract negotiation - I feel the same way about football players. If anything ever comes from this (doubtful anyways), it will most likely be some kind of financial disclosure issue or something similar. The government can not tell a private company how much someone can get paid and that, despite PL shivering in fear in a corner of her trailer, is not going to happen.

They're already doing it, sweetie ... welcome to my trailer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You post an article saying that the government is seeking to do something, than halfway down the page you say they are already doing it.

Your trailer needs to be HAZMAT inpected.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if the "pay da man" crowd in professional sports is ok with "pay da man" for CEOs.

Why not? It is supposed to be about what the market will bear.

Don't like it? Don't pay it. Hire someone that will work for less. Will work based on performance. Dunno, all I know is, the government sucks at this kind of stuff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I live in Raleigh...and know a lot of state gov workers. One guy I play softball with, was going on about CEOs...then in the same breath talking about guys (gov workers) that have retired then go to "conferences" after they've already retired. He wondered why I would get more upset over that than a CEO. CEO may or may not be using my money. The government worker IS using my money (reimbursement/possibly car to travel/etc). I work in the health industry and we are under HUGE compliance rules to insure we do not show favoritism or provide any benefit to a client over another. I'm sure with all the crackdowns on kickbacks in the government, there SHOULD be rules just as strict.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if the "pay da man" crowd in professional sports is ok with "pay da man" for CEOs.

Why not? It is supposed to be about what the market will bear.

Don't like it? Don't pay it. Hire someone that will work for less. Will work based on performance. Dunno, all I know is, the government sucks at this kind of stuff.

Yep. If you're gonna cap salaries...better start blocking them for everyone. Otherwise I see lawsuits in the near future. Equal protection?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they excepted Government bailout money or begged for more. Then I have no problem with the government telling the companies how much they can pay CEOs or whoever, but if they are going to try and tell all companies what they can pay and not pay, well then that is another story. But I think this is about bailout companies, so I have no problem.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As long as it is "the other guy" that gets his salary controlled, nobody cares.

Until they regulate yours. By then too late.

Am skeered.

Weird that they have not been regulating yours, I need to check in on that.

Because every year I have FICA and SS taxes taken out of the money that i have earned.

PS they have been controlling our hard earned money for years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



×