Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Panthers_Lover

US government seeks to rein in executive pay

47 posts in this topic

Sure, but I doubt government salaries are really that big of a chunk of the government's total expenses.

Don't let them fool you... They know how to hide it well...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't let them fool you... They know how to hide it well...

I'll give you that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd love to say how mad I am at government salaries, but in my view there's not a hell of a lot to be pissed about, comparatively speaking. Far more disturbing is when government employees abuse expense accounts, accept bribes....the less you pay them, the more likely they will abuse the system, and we kind of have an unhappy medium for most jobs.

CEOs pay should be more focused on performance and less on contract negotiation - I feel the same way about football players. If anything ever comes from this (doubtful anyways), it will most likely be some kind of financial disclosure issue or something similar. The government can not tell a private company how much someone can get paid and that, despite PL shivering in fear in a corner of her trailer, is not going to happen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd love to say how mad I am at government salaries, but in my view there's not a hell of a lot to be pissed about, comparatively speaking. Far more disturbing is when government employees abuse expense accounts, accept bribes....the less you pay them, the more likely they will abuse the system, and we kind of have an unhappy medium for most jobs.

CEOs pay should be more focused on performance and less on contract negotiation - I feel the same way about football players. If anything ever comes from this (doubtful anyways), it will most likely be some kind of financial disclosure issue or something similar. The government can not tell a private company how much someone can get paid and that, despite PL shivering in fear in a corner of her trailer, is not going to happen.

They're already doing it, sweetie ... welcome to my trailer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You post an article saying that the government is seeking to do something, than halfway down the page you say they are already doing it.

Your trailer needs to be HAZMAT inpected.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if the "pay da man" crowd in professional sports is ok with "pay da man" for CEOs.

Why not? It is supposed to be about what the market will bear.

Don't like it? Don't pay it. Hire someone that will work for less. Will work based on performance. Dunno, all I know is, the government sucks at this kind of stuff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I live in Raleigh...and know a lot of state gov workers. One guy I play softball with, was going on about CEOs...then in the same breath talking about guys (gov workers) that have retired then go to "conferences" after they've already retired. He wondered why I would get more upset over that than a CEO. CEO may or may not be using my money. The government worker IS using my money (reimbursement/possibly car to travel/etc). I work in the health industry and we are under HUGE compliance rules to insure we do not show favoritism or provide any benefit to a client over another. I'm sure with all the crackdowns on kickbacks in the government, there SHOULD be rules just as strict.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if the "pay da man" crowd in professional sports is ok with "pay da man" for CEOs.

Why not? It is supposed to be about what the market will bear.

Don't like it? Don't pay it. Hire someone that will work for less. Will work based on performance. Dunno, all I know is, the government sucks at this kind of stuff.

Yep. If you're gonna cap salaries...better start blocking them for everyone. Otherwise I see lawsuits in the near future. Equal protection?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they excepted Government bailout money or begged for more. Then I have no problem with the government telling the companies how much they can pay CEOs or whoever, but if they are going to try and tell all companies what they can pay and not pay, well then that is another story. But I think this is about bailout companies, so I have no problem.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As long as it is "the other guy" that gets his salary controlled, nobody cares.

Until they regulate yours. By then too late.

Am skeered.

Weird that they have not been regulating yours, I need to check in on that.

Because every year I have FICA and SS taxes taken out of the money that i have earned.

PS they have been controlling our hard earned money for years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • you don't need rock hard facts to reasonably comment on what Nunes has done of late.   WH went to Nunes with a goal to distract away from where the House Intel Committee was going and the direction it was going with it all out in the public.   Nunes did just that.  He shut things down on the WH behalf so they could then figure out there next moves.  Because they know what Yates and company following up Comey would lead to. Eyeball test should tell any right left or middle person that Nunes is at this point not doing an investigation but doing the WH's bidding.  The fact he talks like a lying 8 yr old and acting totally out of character in how he has handled himself speaks volumes.       you want to know what people are so interested in everything? Because Trump and company are LITERALLY doing a coverup right now.  They aren't really hiding that.  They may technically have Spicer say it is outrageous and say stuff in the media.....but there ACTIONS are actually pretty obvious and bold IMO.  So it is only reasonable to want to know what it is they are covering up.   Because really Trump and company are the ones telling people there is something.  
    • Well two of those players are off our draft board so I'm going to give this a no