Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

US government seeks to rein in executive pay


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
46 replies to this topic

#21 Samuel L. Jackson

Samuel L. Jackson

    Banned

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,407
  • Reputation: 1
Banned

Posted 11 June 2009 - 02:09 PM

Sure, but I doubt government salaries are really that big of a chunk of the government's total expenses.


Don't let them fool you... They know how to hide it well...

#22 LiQuiD

LiQuiD

    Plumb Crazy

  • Joined: 21-January 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,260
  • Reputation: 51
HUDDLER

Posted 11 June 2009 - 02:11 PM

Don't let them fool you... They know how to hide it well...


I'll give you that.

#23 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 24,380
  • Reputation: 2,333
SUPPORTER

Posted 11 June 2009 - 02:15 PM

I'd love to say how mad I am at government salaries, but in my view there's not a hell of a lot to be pissed about, comparatively speaking. Far more disturbing is when government employees abuse expense accounts, accept bribes....the less you pay them, the more likely they will abuse the system, and we kind of have an unhappy medium for most jobs.

CEOs pay should be more focused on performance and less on contract negotiation - I feel the same way about football players. If anything ever comes from this (doubtful anyways), it will most likely be some kind of financial disclosure issue or something similar. The government can not tell a private company how much someone can get paid and that, despite PL shivering in fear in a corner of her trailer, is not going to happen.

#24 Panthers_Lover

Panthers_Lover

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,114
  • Reputation: 183
HUDDLER

Posted 11 June 2009 - 02:20 PM

I'd love to say how mad I am at government salaries, but in my view there's not a hell of a lot to be pissed about, comparatively speaking. Far more disturbing is when government employees abuse expense accounts, accept bribes....the less you pay them, the more likely they will abuse the system, and we kind of have an unhappy medium for most jobs.

CEOs pay should be more focused on performance and less on contract negotiation - I feel the same way about football players. If anything ever comes from this (doubtful anyways), it will most likely be some kind of financial disclosure issue or something similar. The government can not tell a private company how much someone can get paid and that, despite PL shivering in fear in a corner of her trailer, is not going to happen.


They're already doing it, sweetie ... welcome to my trailer.

#25 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 24,380
  • Reputation: 2,333
SUPPORTER

Posted 11 June 2009 - 02:21 PM

You post an article saying that the government is seeking to do something, than halfway down the page you say they are already doing it.

Your trailer needs to be HAZMAT inpected.

#26 Epistaxis

Epistaxis

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,184
  • Reputation: 51
HUDDLER

Posted 11 June 2009 - 02:23 PM

I wonder if the "pay da man" crowd in professional sports is ok with "pay da man" for CEOs.

Why not? It is supposed to be about what the market will bear.

Don't like it? Don't pay it. Hire someone that will work for less. Will work based on performance. Dunno, all I know is, the government sucks at this kind of stuff.

#27 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • Joined: 17-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,062
  • Reputation: 458
HUDDLER

Posted 11 June 2009 - 02:28 PM

I live in Raleigh...and know a lot of state gov workers. One guy I play softball with, was going on about CEOs...then in the same breath talking about guys (gov workers) that have retired then go to "conferences" after they've already retired. He wondered why I would get more upset over that than a CEO. CEO may or may not be using my money. The government worker IS using my money (reimbursement/possibly car to travel/etc). I work in the health industry and we are under HUGE compliance rules to insure we do not show favoritism or provide any benefit to a client over another. I'm sure with all the crackdowns on kickbacks in the government, there SHOULD be rules just as strict.

#28 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • Joined: 17-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,062
  • Reputation: 458
HUDDLER

Posted 11 June 2009 - 02:30 PM

I wonder if the "pay da man" crowd in professional sports is ok with "pay da man" for CEOs.

Why not? It is supposed to be about what the market will bear.

Don't like it? Don't pay it. Hire someone that will work for less. Will work based on performance. Dunno, all I know is, the government sucks at this kind of stuff.


Yep. If you're gonna cap salaries...better start blocking them for everyone. Otherwise I see lawsuits in the near future. Equal protection?

#29 Jangler

Jangler

    oddly perched

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 48,817
  • Reputation: 9,377
HUDDLER

Posted 11 June 2009 - 02:30 PM

If they excepted Government bailout money or begged for more. Then I have no problem with the government telling the companies how much they can pay CEOs or whoever, but if they are going to try and tell all companies what they can pay and not pay, well then that is another story. But I think this is about bailout companies, so I have no problem.

#30 thefuzz

thefuzz

    coppin a feel

  • Joined: 12-December 08
  • posts: 8,989
  • Reputation: 1,385
SUPPORTER

Posted 11 June 2009 - 02:33 PM

As long as it is "the other guy" that gets his salary controlled, nobody cares.

Until they regulate yours. By then too late.

Am skeered.



Weird that they have not been regulating yours, I need to check in on that.

Because every year I have FICA and SS taxes taken out of the money that i have earned.

PS they have been controlling our hard earned money for years.