Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

Ideally which position do you want filled in the 1st round?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
63 replies to this topic

Poll: Draft question (105 member(s) have cast votes)

Perfect world; Position you'd address in round round 1

  1. DT (21 votes [20.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 20.00%

  2. WR (33 votes [31.43%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 31.43%

  3. CB (11 votes [10.48%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 10.48%

  4. FS (6 votes [5.71%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 5.71%

  5. Offensive Tackle (24 votes [22.86%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 22.86%

  6. Offensive Guard (10 votes [9.52%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 9.52%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 panther4life

panther4life

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,655
  • Reputation: 1,181
HUDDLER

Posted 20 February 2013 - 07:57 PM

Of course its easy to say BPA regardless of position or at a position if need. This is more of a perfect world thing kind of like Cam being there when we needed a QB in the worst way.

Just assume their's a player rated a "90" and projected perennial all pro at any position you want, which position would you take in this scenario?

Personally I am going WR. The other needs we have don't represent the same value as finding a true # 1. Been discussed in other threads 1k yard receivers don't grow on trees and only roughly half the QB's in the league are fortunate enough to have one. I don't even hate Lafell, I like him for what he is. However it is what it is and he's not likely to grow into a above average # 1 based off what we've seen so far I think his ceiling would be reaching a Moose type level(which would be phenomenal when paired with an a stud # 1). You have to admit its been nice having Smith all these years and not being burdened with having to trying to find a # 1.

I understand the argument for a LT for Cam but personally I'd rather keep Gross and trust him to hold down LT for at least 1-2 more years. This would also give Bell a make or break year to earn the RT spot long term.

I would be fine with a DT or FS rated this highly as well as they are the most glaring holes on our roster right this second.

Looking at avaialble free agents I think we can find DT,FS,O-line help if need be there to at least hold us over for 1 more year. Conversely I see no receiver we can afford who would be much better than Murphy was last year.

Anyway I just wanted to hear some varying opinion's on this so let me hear em.

#2 KissMyConverse

KissMyConverse

    ShoGun of Harlem

  • Joined: 30-September 11
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 716
  • Reputation: 564
HUDDLER

Posted 20 February 2013 - 07:59 PM

Basically BPA of this order- WR/DT/O-Line/S
What I mean BPA is if Warmack is sitting there you don't draft the WR you draft O-line.

#3 Dex

Dex

    Knight of Sunlight

  • Joined: 25-July 11
  • posts: 8,052
  • Reputation: 7,651
SUPPORTER

Posted 20 February 2013 - 08:02 PM

Floyd in the first and Swearinger in the second. PLEASE!

#4 Argus Plexus

Argus Plexus

    Super Kami Guru

  • Joined: 13-September 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,809
  • Reputation: 849
HUDDLER

Posted 20 February 2013 - 08:05 PM

Yeah WR if that was the scenario.

#5 Stroupe-a-loop

Stroupe-a-loop

    Señor Member

  • Joined: 06-September 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,672
  • Reputation: 393
HUDDLER

Posted 20 February 2013 - 08:07 PM

Perfect world? I'd take a good Offensive Tackle. I like Gross and still want him for a while, but I feel like the fall off from him to our other tackles is way worse than Smitty's backups. Age is going to take them both, but I feel like we have enough good skill position guys to make due without Smitty.

#6 DaCityKats

DaCityKats

    feed KB 2014

  • Joined: 11-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 9,160
  • Reputation: 1,177
HUDDLER

Posted 20 February 2013 - 08:07 PM

BPA out of WR,OL,DL.

#7 BigSyke

BigSyke

    I Know you Watching me but I'm watching you too Playa...

  • Joined: 07-November 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,194
  • Reputation: 113
HUDDLER

Posted 20 February 2013 - 08:33 PM

i voted cb because i got my own draft scenario guys....ill be posting it soon. lol

#8 Moose Hoover

Moose Hoover

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 19-September 12
  • posts: 349
  • Reputation: 250
SUPPORTER

Posted 20 February 2013 - 08:57 PM

based on op's scenario, I would have to go with an all pro receiver.

#9 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,743
  • Reputation: 8,020
Moderators

Posted 20 February 2013 - 09:15 PM

ideally we'd address RG and RT in FA, redo gamble and gross deals for cheap so we don't have to go through the hassle of trying to replace them, sign canty, switch out ron edwards for dwan, and then draft WR and FS in the first couple rounds.

that's my ideal anyway.

#10 Sod

Sod

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 30-December 12
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 161
  • Reputation: 19
HUDDLER

Posted 20 February 2013 - 09:41 PM

It depends on what Gettleman can do in FA but in your scenario, I guess WR

#11 GoCarolina8990

GoCarolina8990

    All Day

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,463
  • Reputation: 955
HUDDLER

Posted 20 February 2013 - 09:46 PM

Im in awe how many people want WR

WR is the last position you want in this draft, in the first. Yeah we are in desperate need of a WR but that's when you make mistakes is when you are desperate. Lets protect our franchise QB and get the best O Lineman available

#12 KillerKat

KillerKat

    GTFO Shula

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 20,719
  • Reputation: 4,887
HUDDLER

Posted 20 February 2013 - 09:52 PM

It's hard to throw to a receiver when you're laying on your back