Obama's world (sequestration)
#1
Posted 21 February 2013 - 04:51 PM
Sounds different than the Chicken Little speech he gave the other day.
#2
Posted 21 February 2013 - 04:53 PM
#3
Posted 21 February 2013 - 05:28 PM
#4
Posted 21 February 2013 - 10:57 PM
#5
Posted 21 February 2013 - 11:38 PM
#6
Posted 21 February 2013 - 11:40 PM
#7
Posted 22 February 2013 - 07:15 AM
"When you look at this final agreement that we came to with the White House, I got 98 percent of what I wanted. I'm pretty happy," Boehner said in an interview with CBS News on Monday evening.
He also said he expected to remain Speaker of the House.
Some political observers speculated Boehner's Speakership was on the line as he sought Republican support for a compromise agreement congressional leaders negotiated with the White House.
The measure passed the House Monday 269-161, with 174 Republicans backing the bill. Sixty-six Republicans voted against the plan.
Read more: http://thehill.com/b...l#ixzz2Ld5Fr7jg
Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook
#8
Posted 22 February 2013 - 04:02 PM
What a joke.
Using fear to not cut anything from his precious government.
#9
Posted 22 February 2013 - 07:30 PM
If the press would actually take their lips off the Presidents butt long enough to breath, the oxygen might help them report that all the mini dramas he promotes as press conferences/interviews are in the least horribly deceptive.
#10
Posted 22 February 2013 - 09:25 PM
#11
Posted 22 February 2013 - 11:05 PM
That's just moronic.
Obama's just a horrible liar...and what's sad is that everyone's fine with it. Clinton got a rough ride....this guy...lol...he's getting a mulligan for his mulligan it's looking like.
#12
Posted 23 February 2013 - 06:55 AM
and then they could finally expose the truth about his Kenyan birthplace.
you are sort of turning into a "drive by" poster, know you're in a different job now, but dang
#13
Posted 23 February 2013 - 08:46 AM
The sequester was agreed upon as a political face saving measure by the Dems because the Republicans refused to do anything by their rules but they needed to show something, anything at all, to the public on the issue. The Republicans approved it because they thought they'd have their guy in the White House by now and have more leverage. The Republicans lost the bet. That's it.
#14
Posted 23 February 2013 - 09:03 AM
As usual, even though I'm only a drive by now, I am right and you are wrong.
#15
Posted 23 February 2013 - 09:37 AM

Yeah. And for the love of God a smaller increase in spending is NOT A CUT
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





