Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

DaCityKats

Scouting Combine

507 posts in this topic

lane johnson with a 4.75 40 dash time....terron armstead is faster. lane should come in at 2nd.....all those other guys are avg.

still really good for lane. probably wont be at 14....LT are really important guys.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sold on armstead. Seems to have a good head on his shoulders as well as being very athletic. What's his projection?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who is vinston painter?.. This guy looks IMPRESSIVE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lololol I love this guys name Matt Stankiewitch

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wouldn't shock me tbh, he played QB in HS and was a TE/DE when he came to OU. Kid is extremely athletic...

It'd shock me.

PERHAPS he could run a 4.5 when he's in peak shape. Not when he's trying to play LT in the NFL though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It'd shock me.

PERHAPS he could run a 4.5 when he's in peak shape. Not when he's trying to play LT in the NFL though.

While it would surprise me to see a guy that size run a 40 that fast it wouldn't be overly shocking because he's always been extremely athletic. Doesn't matter because he ran in the 4.7's...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cooper is very well spoken in his interview with bucky brooks. Like what i've seen from him today.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who is vinston painter?.. This guy looks IMPRESSIVE

I was thinking the same thing. Didn't know who he was but I like what I'm seeing so far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was thinking the same thing. Didn't know who he was but I like what I'm seeing so far.

The explosion on the 40 really caught my eye and the guy is built like a truck. Supposedly on tape he doesn't bend like he should that's what was said on air I may have to look into it because my lord he looks like a monster.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Color me crazy, but I'm actually very intrigued by Vance McDonald. I know we need line help, I know it's probably not going to happen (most likely shouldn't happen), but could you imagine two TE sets with Olson and this kid?

We could run or pass easily, run the no-huddle with this as a base package, impose our will. The comparisons to Witten don't hurt at all, and the kid has the size and strength of a lineman without the weight. We could pick him up in the first, then a solid guard in the second. It's probably a 5% chance at best this happens, but don't rule it out either.

And yeah, I've been clamoring for months now that we need OL or DL help first and foremost. But I just can't help thinking about this scenario.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Same people defending Hillary a few months ago are now drawing the conclusion that Flynn... and by association Trump... must be guilty of something because Flynn is getting immunity from the FBI. Works both ways. For the record... IMHO both Hillary and Trump are crooks.  If justice in this nation were truly blind these two politicians and their henchmen would be doing a long stretch in prison by now.
    • Slot receivers don't exist in 2 TE sets unless we're lining a TE on the outside which I haven't seen much out of the currently constructed Panthers. Maybe McCaffrey if he were to be split out wide but the Panthers usually keep a RB with Cam in-case Cam needs the extra protection and audibles the RB to block.  The Panthers would be best suited pairing KB with a speedster such as Charles Johnson, who's adept at running deep routes. Keep Howard and possible the RB (if not blocking) on short routes, KB on working the intermediate routes, Olsen running intermediate/deep routes, and Johnson running deep routes. That way Cam has a receiver on every level. All of this assumes Shula constructs a properly worked passing attack. 
    • Yes, that is correct. My point being Clinton was impeached and stayed in office. Almost everyone calling for impeachment of Trump thinks it means to remove him from office. He would have to be impeached and then found guilty to do that. The impeachment alone does not remove him. And my original point, no one was bringing up the electoral college back then. It makes no sense. Because the popular would surely rid us of corrupt politicians, right?