Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

According to Person we're keeping Williams...

159 posts in this topic

Posted

It has nothing to do with Williams if you actually listen to the argument.

It has to do with a limited amount of rushing attempts available....and the money better suited to go toward a player that plays every down.

Why can't you comprehend that not matter how you shake a stick at it, the cost of cutting him is 9.6 million.Spread it over 1 or 2 years and its still 9.6 million. We can keep him for 8.2 million and cut him next year and save money without carrying over dead money into the future.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

It is literally cheaper to keep D-will than cut him. 9.6 million immediate cap for cutting him or we can keep him for 8.2 million. Not that hard of a decision.

so we can pay 9.6 mill to not have him play, or pay 8.2 mill to have him play.

Sounds like we did the right thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Dwill Is an exelent back. Running read option and out of shotgun is not utilizing an exelent back. Getting smacked behind the los is not his problem.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Sounds like a used car salesman answer. Look for a trade

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Like you said earlier it has to be because of the cap. Im not a cap guy by any means. Cutting him probably doesn't make enough of an impact cap wise at this point. The value of keeping him must outweigh the value of cutting him.

BINGO!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

ha.

talk about reaching and making mountains out of molehills.

this whole write up is based on one comment gettleman made a couple days ago when he said he doesn't know why they shouldn't be able to keep both. he didn't say anything about intention. he said decisions have to be made, but he didn't see why they wouldn't be able to make it work.

i do think the panthers would like to keep him, but those very few words gettleman spoke doesn't carry the meaning joe thinks it does.

joe is doing his best yas and florio impression throwing poo at the wall and seeing if it sticks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Thats excellent if we can find a way to acclamate both contracts. Wonderful news.

Accommodate

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Why can't you comprehend that not matter how you shake a stick at it, the cost of cutting him is 9.6 million.Spread it over 1 or 2 years and its still 9.6 million. We can keep him for 8.2 million and cut him next year and save money without carrying over dead money into the future.

Making him a June 1st cut saves money in 2013 and 2014.

Would give us more room to bring in a body that plays every down in a position of need.

Hurney screwed us so nothing is ideal. If all we do is cut Gamble....Hurney could of and would have done that. The hiring of Gettlemen very easily could of been Richardson simply bringing in the same old same old. Gettlemen needs to do something besides just land a 1st round draft pick.....his brilliance shouldn't be celebrated yet....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

ha.

talk about reaching and making mountains out of molehills.

this whole write up is based on one comment gettleman made a couple days ago when he said he doesn't know why they shouldn't be able to keep both. he didn't say anything about intention. he said decisions have to be made, but he didn't see why they wouldn't be able to make it work.

i do think the panthers would like to keep him, but those very few words gettleman spoke doesn't carry the meaning joe thinks it does.

He does also cite a "league source" (probably DeAngelo's agent).

Still, on the whole it's speculation, and you always have to be careful about taking reporter speculation as gospel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Accommodate

Pts for the correction..Edited ..why did I think acclamate I wonder?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

He does also cite a "league source" (probably DeAngelo's agent).

Still, on the whole it's speculation, and you always have to be careful about taking reporter speculation as gospel.

agreed....esp. person's. the guy has proven that he's a hack.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

2013 Cap hits

Cam+ Stewart+ Tolbert = roughly 11 mill

Rivera's 2nd favorite RB = 8 mill

Yeah, keeping Williams and not asking him to rip up his deal or be cut makes tons of sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites