Once Gamble is Cut, Cornerback Becomes Our Biggest Need
#1
Posted 23 February 2013 - 08:55 PM
So what do y'all think we do? Does Gettleman show some of that personnel savvy and pick us up a cheap free agent? Do we address this in the draft? And if so, when? 1st round? 2nd? 4th? 5th? With Milliner likely going before pick #14, are there any other prospects that could be the BPA at that pick? Rhodes? Banks? Trufant? Or do we try to find one of those guys at pick #44 or beyond?
#2
Posted 23 February 2013 - 09:02 PM
it's not any more of a need than it was before.
#3
Posted 23 February 2013 - 09:05 PM
#4
Posted 23 February 2013 - 09:06 PM
when was the last time Gamble played any way?
#5
Posted 23 February 2013 - 09:07 PM
gamble is a player we can move away from and barely notice. he's not a difference maker. we're not any better or worse of because of him being on or off the field.
it's not any more of a need than it was before.
That's crazy talk. Our pass defense is better with Chris Gamble on the field. The only reason we didn't get thrown all over in the second half of the season was because the D-Line was on fire. I would not feel comfortable going into the season with Munnerlyn, Norman, Thomas, Dockery and some late rounders / UDFAs as our lineup in the secondary.
#6
Posted 23 February 2013 - 09:08 PM
I defended Hurney many times but now the more I analyze our cap situation and the major whiffs he had when trading future picks I am starting to think I was just being a homer.
#7
Posted 23 February 2013 - 09:09 PM
How many games did we lose with Gamble in 2012?
#8
Posted 23 February 2013 - 09:11 PM
if we improve our front 7 our DB's will instantly become better.
when was the last time Gamble played any way?
Yeah, that logic holds as long as we have Hardy and Johnson going up against bad O-Lines like San Diego's. The minute we go up against any type of stout line, where out tackles can't collapse the pocket and the ends only break contain every second or third play instead of every down, we're going to get thrown on for 500 yards.
#9
Posted 23 February 2013 - 09:11 PM
#10
Posted 23 February 2013 - 09:13 PM
#11
Posted 23 February 2013 - 09:14 PM
How many games did we win without Gamble in 2012?
How many games did we lose with Gamble in 2012?
I think this is an overly simplistic view.
We won games late in the season because the D-Line came on like crazy, and more importantly because we moved away from the read option and back to a more traditional pro-style offense.
We did not win more games later in the season because Chris Gamble got injured, or because of the play of our secondary.
#12
Posted 23 February 2013 - 09:15 PM
#13
Posted 23 February 2013 - 09:16 PM
i'd prefer to bring in a stopgap that can play CB2 at or around vet minimum and provide solid depth, leadership, and rotation with guys like thomas and norman.
#14
Posted 23 February 2013 - 09:17 PM
#15
Posted 23 February 2013 - 09:17 PM
who is this Gamble you speak of?
I think you, and Panthers fans in general, need a reminder.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





