Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

If


  • Please log in to reply
13 replies to this topic

#1 stirs

stirs

    I Reckon So

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,073
  • Reputation: 1,997
HUDDLER

Posted 24 February 2013 - 08:06 AM

Obama's second term ends with

Higher Unemployment
More on food stamps
Higher poverty rate
Higher taxes
Exponentially higher debt
Weaker military
Worse race relations
More divided country
Less confidence than ever in government

Will it have been a successful presidency? Normally, the answer would be a resounding no, but certain nuts and bolts issues and measurments do not seem to matter currently. It is all about the new sets of standards they feed us to rate their success.

Kinda like saying my car is wrecked, in a ditch, flat tires, windows busted out and the motor is blown. Our current feeling would be that we have a great car because the hood ornament is shiny.

#2 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 24,416
  • Reputation: 2,348
SUPPORTER

Posted 24 February 2013 - 07:24 PM

If you are still as off the deep end then as you are now, It will indeed be a resounding success.

#3 SZ James (banned)

SZ James (banned)

  • Joined: 24-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,436
  • Reputation: 3,529
HUDDLER

Posted 24 February 2013 - 07:51 PM

Posted Image

#4 PhillyB

PhillyB

    sườn núi phía đông thứ ba của mặt trời

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 22,947
  • Reputation: 18,376
  • Locationthird spur east of the sun
HUDDLER

Posted 24 February 2013 - 08:10 PM

as populations grow, so do raw numbers, which is why looking the totals alone rarely provides an accurate statistic. "the debt is higher than it's ever been" is a misnomer because it ignores the fact that most presidents left office with a higher national debt than when they started. you've got to look at diachronic analyses like growth and development to really make an accurate statement either way.

also success is an operative word because what gives the word meaning is the extent to which an individual's life has been improved by decisions directly relating to the presidency (and, of course, you're going to get all kinds of different answers depending on who you ask.)

keep in mind also that categories like "divided country" are incredibly simplistic terms in which to judge a term in office as they ignore the symbiosis between opposing ideologies and the effect of this conflict/propoganda on public opinion that forms these types of divisions.

#5 PhillyB

PhillyB

    sườn núi phía đông thứ ba của mặt trời

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 22,947
  • Reputation: 18,376
  • Locationthird spur east of the sun
HUDDLER

Posted 24 February 2013 - 08:11 PM

tl:dr version: idk and it's probably not that simple

#6 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 24,416
  • Reputation: 2,348
SUPPORTER

Posted 24 February 2013 - 08:16 PM

If it's "probably not that simple", stirs "probably won't be able to post anything meaningful about it".

#7 Delhommey

Delhommey

    Moderator

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 12,711
  • Reputation: 2,351
Moderators

Posted 24 February 2013 - 08:20 PM

So "higher debt" and "weaker military" are both key measurements.

I think I see stirs' out here.

#8 stirs

stirs

    I Reckon So

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,073
  • Reputation: 1,997
HUDDLER

Posted 24 February 2013 - 08:21 PM

as populations grow, so do raw numbers, which is why looking the totals alone rarely provides an accurate statistic. "the debt is higher than it's ever been" is a misnomer because it ignores the fact that most presidents left office with a higher national debt than when they started. you've got to look at diachronic analyses like growth and development to really make an accurate statement either way.

also success is an operative word because what gives the word meaning is the extent to which an individual's life has been improved by decisions directly relating to the presidency (and, of course, you're going to get all kinds of different answers depending on who you ask.)

keep in mind also that categories like "divided country" are incredibly simplistic terms in which to judge a term in office as they ignore the symbiosis between opposing ideologies and the effect of this conflict/propoganda on public opinion that forms these types of divisions.


I am certain that many like Reagan were remembered fondly for the Berlin Wall and outlasting the USSR for instance and getting the economy turned around. At the same time, he increased debt quite a bit, but did drop taxes. So his was a mixed bag. But, he was an actor and could give quite a speech, so his overall approvals were quite high.

Just wondering what numbers and judgements would lift Obama up as most of his in the afforementioned catagories are not good. The redeeming numbers if you will. Course there are 3 more years. Lots of people count the healthcare thing as his crowning achievement, but too early to tell how that one is going to turn out.

#9 PhillyB

PhillyB

    sườn núi phía đông thứ ba của mặt trời

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 22,947
  • Reputation: 18,376
  • Locationthird spur east of the sun
HUDDLER

Posted 24 February 2013 - 08:38 PM

yeah i'd say the passage of "obamacare" is going to be his legacy (though we'll have to see how the next four years go.) and that, of course, depending on who you ask, is going to be the hinge upon which he is judged as a success or a failure

#10 Kevin Greene

Kevin Greene

    I Don't Want To Get Off On A Rant Here But....

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 18,913
  • Reputation: 4,239
HUDDLER

Posted 24 February 2013 - 10:40 PM




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users