Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

Coach Rivera hints at signing Mike Wallace (edited to include link)


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
146 replies to this topic

#37 KaseKlosed

KaseKlosed

    @CMackMost

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,211
  • Reputation: 277
HUDDLER

Posted 26 February 2013 - 11:07 AM

Depending on how hew the contract is designed (performance based loaded) we may have a chance. He is a touchdown scorer, he is a gameplan changer (more room to run) He will attract every teams best DB and Smitty could have a monster year again. He loves to CATCH the ball unlike some WRs we have. He would instantly change the look of our offense.

#38 Boltergeist

Boltergeist

    you can't spell Mayock without MC

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,432
  • Reputation: 204
HUDDLER

Posted 26 February 2013 - 11:08 AM

I would love to have him here, but I think Rivera was referring to signing a receiver in general. Either way the position needs to be addressed this season. Most of the media thinks Miami will sign Wallace to a big contract, which I don't understand considering they not long ago traded away Brandon Marshall for peanuts.


I think the Marshall exit was more about off field and the combo of a new regime. As for Wallace, Miami might be the favorite, but I wouldn't count out that new Patriot cap space being used to take a stab

#39 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 27,262
  • Reputation: 5,361
Moderators

Posted 26 February 2013 - 11:10 AM

huh? he put off drafting WR's?

2012 Joe Adams
2011 Kealoha Pilares
2010 Brandon LaFell
2010 David Gettis


Marty Hurney drafted 2 WRs. LaFell and Jarrett...and never a 1st rounder on one.

The rest where shots in the dark or meant to be heavy special team players.

#40 GoCarolina8990

GoCarolina8990

    All Day

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,463
  • Reputation: 955
HUDDLER

Posted 26 February 2013 - 11:11 AM

I know Miami really wants Wallace because Tannehill desperately needs someone to throw to so I wouldn't be surprised if they threw the most money at him to come

Cam needs someone to throw too also though...and Mike Wallace would be more open here in Carolina

#41 MrBubba

MrBubba

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 28-February 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,716
  • Reputation: 209
HUDDLER

Posted 26 February 2013 - 11:11 AM

I think the Marshall exit was more about off field and the combo of a new regime. As for Wallace, Miami might be the favorite, but I wouldn't count out that new Patriot cap space being used to take a stab


Pats picking up Wallace and keeping Welker; their TE's and Brady; dang, thats a little scary.

#42 chknwing

chknwing

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 04-May 09
  • posts: 8,704
  • Reputation: 6,793
SUPPORTER

Posted 26 February 2013 - 11:11 AM

I think he was referring to a quality #1, someone who could take over for Steve when the times comes.


Because Steve Smith was drafted in the first? You guys are to quick to judge. Carolina has a nice crew of young WR to groom. Lafell is coming along. Joe Adams will be a beast.

#43 chknwing

chknwing

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 04-May 09
  • posts: 8,704
  • Reputation: 6,793
SUPPORTER

Posted 26 February 2013 - 11:12 AM

Marty Hurney drafted 2 WRs. LaFell and Jarrett...and never a 1st rounder on one.

The rest where shots in the dark or meant to be heavy special team players.


Wasnt Steve Smith drafted to be a Punt Returner?

#44 Dex

Dex

    Knight of Sunlight

  • Joined: 25-July 11
  • posts: 8,047
  • Reputation: 7,650
SUPPORTER

Posted 26 February 2013 - 11:15 AM

NFL.com reads the Huddle.

http://www.nfl.com/n...ke-mike-wallace

#45 TheRed

TheRed

    California Dreamin'

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 15,456
  • Reputation: 8,376
HUDDLER

Posted 26 February 2013 - 11:15 AM

I think the Marshall exit was more about off field and the combo of a new regime. As for Wallace, Miami might be the favorite, but I wouldn't count out that new Patriot cap space being used to take a stab


True. Though I haven't heard any trouble since he's been in Chicago.

Possible but you don't think the Pats will resign Welker? He's 31 but I don't think they'll let him walk.

#46 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 27,262
  • Reputation: 5,361
Moderators

Posted 26 February 2013 - 11:17 AM

Wasnt Steve Smith drafted to be a Punt Returner?


Hurney didn't draft him....

and Steve Smith is what you would call stumbling upon gold (like a Tom Brady). Unfortunately, we act as if we can replace Smith in the same manner we found him.

#47 Lumps

Lumps

    Jase is butthurt

  • Joined: 20-October 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,040
  • Reputation: 1,135
HUDDLER

Posted 26 February 2013 - 11:21 AM

Because Steve Smith was drafted in the first? You guys are to quick to judge. Carolina has a nice crew of young WR to groom. Lafell is coming along. Joe Adams will be a beast.



Was smitty drafted by Hurney? and lol Lafell is a #3 and Adams has A LOT of work to do if you think he'll even compete for #1.

#48 TheRed

TheRed

    California Dreamin'

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 15,456
  • Reputation: 8,376
HUDDLER

Posted 26 February 2013 - 11:23 AM

Because Steve Smith was drafted in the first? You guys are to quick to judge. Carolina has a nice crew of young WR to groom. Lafell is coming along. Joe Adams will be a beast.


Yeah sometimes you can get lucky. Steve is an exception to the rule, he has a ridiculous drive.

We can go through the laundry list of Hurney's WR picks but it is a waste of time, you know the names.

Outside of Smitty and Lafell who I like but he is inconsistent, who do we have that is such a threat?