Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Johnny Rockets

Philly Cop Acquitted

38 posts in this topic

Was it a jury trial that acquitted him? Or, just the judge making a decree?

Because if there was not more to the story than what the video showed, I don't see how the guy was not found guilty of assault.

I wont say never but its got to be extraordinarily rare to empanel a jury for a simple assault.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not impossible that he was trying to slap a drink out of her hand. I think beyond a reasonable doubt comes into play. I'm guessing he would not have gotten jail time for this but community service and a fine.

He already lost his job which is punishment enough.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Video shows a dude throwing beer/liquid on the cops and the woman is coming from a direction generally the same as the fella retreated. Cop probably thought she was the one that did it and went to smack the beer/drink from her hand and "inadvertantly" hit her in the face. My honest opinion is that in a quick anger moment he wanted to smack the drink out and away from her face and if he happened to hit her...so be it. It is simple assault.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My honest opinion is that in a quick anger moment he wanted to smack the drink out and away from her face and if he happened to hit her...so be it. It is simple assault.

No that is the point. To prove guilt in a simple assault case you have to prove he did it willfully and with intent.

If he hit her by accident it is not simple assault.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know...I'm just saying he intended to "inadvertantely" smack the crap out of her...and knock a drink out of her hand in the process.

But hard to prove intent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really arguing here (I think he's guilty either way) but isn't hitting her hand to knock away a drink/beer hitting her? I mean it's clear from the video he hit her on purpose. I suppose it's debatable what his true intent was (whether to knock something from her hand or flat out hit her), but imo it's assault either way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really arguing here (I think he's guilty either way) but isn't hitting her hand to knock away a drink/beer hitting her? I mean it's clear from the video he hit her on purpose. I suppose it's debatable what his true intent was (whether to knock something from her hand or flat out hit her), but imo it's assault either way.

If he intended to hit the cup and hit her by accident it is not assault under the legal definition. It's up to the plaintiff to prove that there was intent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Should have been convicted since he recklessly caused injury, right?

CHAPTER 27

ASSAULT

Sec.

2701. Simple assault.

2702. Aggravated assault.

2703. Assault by prisoner.

2703.1. Aggravated harassment by prisoner.

2704. Assault by life prisoner.

2705. Recklessly endangering another person.

2706. Terroristic threats.

2707. Propulsion of missiles into an occupied vehicle or onto

a roadway.

2707.1. Discharge of a firearm into an occupied structure.

2707.2. Paintball guns and paintball markers.

2708. Use of tear or noxious gas in labor disputes.

2709. Harassment.

2709.1. Stalking.

2710. Ethnic intimidation.

2711. Probable cause arrests in domestic violence cases.

2712. Assault on sports official.

2713. Neglect of care-dependent person.

2714. Unauthorized administration of intoxicant.

2715. Threat to use weapons of mass destruction.

2716. Weapons of mass destruction.

2717. Terrorism.

Enactment. Chapter 27 was added December 6, 1972, P.L.1482,

No.334, effective in six months.

Cross References. Chapter 27 is referred to in section

5985.1 of Title 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure).

§ 2701. Simple assault.

(a) Offense defined.--A person is guilty of assault if he:

(1) attempts to cause or intentionally, knowingly or

recklessly causes bodily injury to another;

(2) negligently causes bodily injury to another with a

deadly weapon;

(3) attempts by physical menace to put another in fear

of imminent serious bodily injury; or

(4) conceals or attempts to conceal a hypodermic needle

on his person and intentionally or knowingly penetrates a law

enforcement officer or an officer or an employee of a

correctional institution, county jail or prison, detention

facility or mental hospital during the course of an arrest or

any search of the person.

(B) Grading.--Simple assault is a misdemeanor of the second

degree unless committed:

(1) in a fight or scuffle entered into by mutual

consent, in which case it is a misdemeanor of the third

degree; or

(2) against a child under 12 years of age by an adult 21

years of age or older, in which case it is a misdemeanor of

the first degree.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I got charged with assault inflicting serious bodily injury, once. The other kid started the fight, it's not my fault he sucked at fighting. Anyhow, he got caught lying on the stand and my case was dropped to simple assault, with no fines or anything - just court cost.

Random, but felt like sharing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Should have been convicted since he recklessly caused injury, right?

We are getting into the minutiae of the law but I think if you intend something reasonable it is not reckless under the law. So driving 120 miles per hour and hurting someone is reckless. Or doing something else completely stupid and hurting someone.

Assuming his intention was to knock away a cup that would probably not be considered reckless. As long as you consider that in and of itself a reasonable action then no he still wouldn't be charged.

Here is what wiki defines as reckless:

"Conduct whereby the actor does not desire harmful consequence but...foresees the possibility and consciously takes the risk,"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites