Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Bwood's Highly Anticipated Post Combine Mock (2/27/13)

133 posts in this topic

Posted

never commented on trufant but the dude is a baller...only guy i like over him is rhodes. yeah he will have some problems with the run but idont think corners are known for tackling lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Show me where he is universally ranked below others. Trufant is the Stephen Gilmore of this years draft and deservingly so.

Stay out of the draft forum if you don't know what the fug you're talking about freshman.

Find me something that says he's better than Milliner and Rhodes. Or Vacarro for that matter. Or any of the DT's, receivers, and offensive linemen we could be taking.

You're treating it as if we're picking at the bottom of the first round. The only way we should take Trufant is if we traded down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I really dislike the first pick. I honestly think you're trying to hard to be different, but in reality that'd be a huge reach. If he ends up picked by any team in the top 20 then ill apologize but until then it's a horrible pick. The rest looked good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Find me something that says he's better than Milliner and Rhodes. Or Vacarro for that matter. Or any of the DT's, receivers, and offensive linemen we could be taking.

You're treating it as if we're picking at the bottom of the first round. The only way we should take Trufant is if we traded down.

It's called watch some fugging tape on the guy. Milliner and Rhodes most likely won't even be available. Vacarro is overrated garbage. And I'm all for taking one of the top receivers and DTs if they are available. Once again it all completely depends on free agency.

So when Trufant unexpectedly flies up boards at the last second like with Stephen Gilmore last year, are you going to go back to being my little bitch?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I really dislike the first pick. I honestly think you're trying to hard to be different, but in reality that'd be a huge reach. If he ends up picked by any team in the top 20 then ill apologize but until then it's a horrible pick. The rest looked good.

Please explain how it would be a reach lol. Please. Anyone that sees Trufant as a reach only bases their draft knowledge off of popular draft "experts".

Not trying to be different at all, I've been pumping up Trufant since October and I think he will have a Stephen Gilmore like rise in the draft.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Please explain how it would be a reach lol. Please. Anyone that sees Trufant as a reach only bases their draft knowledge off of popular draft "experts".

Not trying to be different at all, I've been pumping up Trufant since October and I think he will have a Stephen Gilmore like rise in the draft.

Those draft experts get paid. You're just some guy sitting at home behind a keyboard.

I'm not trying to be rude, but that's reality.

We can argue all we want, but IF he get's drafted by ANY team in the top 20, I'll apologize and admit you were right. If he goes towards the end of the first round or even slips in the second, it means that multiple teams' scouts didn't see him as BPA and I'll stand by my opinion.

Fair enough?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

This may be one of the worst mock drafts I've ever read.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Vaccaro is overrated, but Trufant with our 14th pick is laughable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Trufant had a hell of a season, followed by an excellent Senior Bowl, and a great combine performance.

After the season before the Senior Bowl and Combine he was a late first/early second round selection. His stock has skyrocketed since then and should be a top 15 and definitely a top 20 selection.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

It's called watch some fugging tape on the guy. Milliner and Rhodes most likely won't even be available. Vacarro is overrated garbage. And I'm all for taking one of the top receivers and DTs if they are available. Once again it all completely depends on free agency.

So when Trufant unexpectedly flies up boards at the last second like with Stephen Gilmore last year, are you going to go back to being my little bitch?

I like Trufant a lot, I don't disregard that he's likely underrated, but you're just such a douche to anyone who disagrees with what you say. Someone comes on here and says that they disagree, and you're sitting there as if you're Nostradamus and you're never wrong.

I think it's funny how offended you get though. Like a little toddler when he doesn't get his way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Look, Bwood's approach is correct. You're not thinking for yourself if you're just going off Mel Kiper's opinion all the time. Look at Trufant's tape, look at his combine numbers, this guy has a chance to be a top corner.

Where I disagree with him is his attitude. Bwood, ask yourself, what was the point of posting this mock? Was it to start a healthy conversation about prospects? Maybe you wanted the respect of other posters? Whatever your goal was, you won't get there by name-calling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

This may be one of the worst mock drafts I've ever read.

Coming from the guy who called me an idiot for saying Eric Fisher was worthy of a first round pick.

I bet you won't even come back with a reasonable explanation of why this draft wouldn't work.

Go watch your hot in Cleveland marathons.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites