Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Who the Panther are looking to draft

47 posts in this topic

Posted · Report post

did they have a similar type post in 2012?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Star

Vaccaro

Johnson

Warmack

Richardson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

did they have a similar type post in 2012?

last year they didn't post anything draft related till after we drafted keek

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

These are not players we have shown interest in. These are simply some of the players who are projected to go in the top 10, who if they drop to 14 would be considered BPA at their respective positions. Truth is we likely won't have a huge choice if any and maybe only 1 of these guys would even be available so making a list of all five as if they all would be available is stupid even for the off-season. If all five were available then we would still have to see who we picked up in free agency and who we dumped before you could make a semi-intelligent choice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

also defensive player from the pac 12? "rolls eyes" would almost rather get a 2nd string player from LSU that barely made the team

Truth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

These are not players we have shown interest in. These are simply some of the players who are projected to go in the top 10, who if they drop to 14 would be considered BPA at their respective positions. Truth is we likely won't have a huge choice if any and maybe only 1 of these guys would even be available so making a list of all five as if they all would be available is stupid even for the off-season. If all five were available then we would still have to see who we picked up in free agency and who we dumped before you could make a semi-intelligent choice.

not exactlly Star and Bjron are the only constant top 10's in the group, Bjorn wont be a need if we plan on keeping Hardy though, and Star would only fall to us if someone gets scared about his possible heart condition, but outside of those two the rest as far as I can tell are projected 10-20 so that's our area.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

anyone else remember when Mark Carrier said we would have taken Barron over Kuechly last year?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

not exactlly Star and Bjron are the only constant top 10's in the group, Bjorn wont be a need if we plan on keeping Hardy though, and Star would only fall to us if someone gets scared about his possible heart condition, but outside of those two the rest as far as I can tell are projected 10-20 so that's our area.

You must be looking at something different that I am.

Here is a draft which was updated today which shows Warmack at 2, Werner at 5, and Patterson at 10. At our pick we are supposed to take Rhodes at 14. Star is projected at 15 and Vaccaro is 18. So using the BPA philosophy assuming our board looks like theirs, you would pick Warmack first, Werner 2nd, Patterson 3rd. You wouldn't pick Star or Vaccaro because they aren't BPAs.

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/prospectrankings

Here is another from Gil Brandt who is a smart guy. This one has Werner at 2, Warmack at 10, Vacarro at 15, Patterson at 16, and Star is not even in the first round.

In this case it would be Werner hands down with Warmack second. Everyone else wouldn't necessary be BPA and picked by us at all even if available,

http://www.nfl.com/draft/2013/mock-drafts/gil-brandt/165254

And the problem is that all these drafts and your opinion is based on need not BPA. Why doesn't anyone understand what BPA means. BPA is best player available regardless of need...............

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Xavier Rhodes

Kewann Short

Keenan Allen

If those guys arent avaikble. My choice in that order. Subject to change

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Lol PAC 12

That's right the Pac offenses do suck....oh wait.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

if by new name to emerge you mean that you are throwing his name out there as a player you want o see us pick up? I could care less, focus should be put solely on players we have shown interest in and not wishful thinking.

upon further review yeah, so you want us to spend the 15 pick on someone projected to go into the second, he's considered a late first at best because of his speed, also defensive player from the pac 12? "rolls eyes" would almost rather get a 2nd string player from LSU that barely made the team

You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about so I won't even waste my time. Ill remember to quote your old uneducated ass when Trufant goes top 15.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

if by new name to emerge you mean that you are throwing his name out there as a player you want o see us pick up? I could care less, focus should be put solely on players we have shown interest in and not wishful thinking.

upon further review yeah, so you want us to spend the 15 pick on someone projected to go into the second, he's considered a late first at best because of his speed, also defensive player from the pac 12? "rolls eyes" would almost rather get a 2nd string player from LSU that barely made the team

This statement is beyond moronic...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites