Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Who the Panther are looking to draft


  • Please log in to reply
46 replies to this topic

#16 panthers55

panthers55

    Starting all over again

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,459 posts
  • LocationAt the lake

Posted 27 February 2013 - 09:33 PM

These are not players we have shown interest in. These are simply some of the players who are projected to go in the top 10, who if they drop to 14 would be considered BPA at their respective positions. Truth is we likely won't have a huge choice if any and maybe only 1 of these guys would even be available so making a list of all five as if they all would be available is stupid even for the off-season. If all five were available then we would still have to see who we picked up in free agency and who we dumped before you could make a semi-intelligent choice.

#17 SCP

SCP

    Crop Dusting Son of a Bitch

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,100 posts
  • LocationOn a Sales Call

Posted 27 February 2013 - 09:33 PM

also defensive player from the pac 12? "rolls eyes" would almost rather get a 2nd string player from LSU that barely made the team

Truth

#18 Doc Holiday

Doc Holiday

    NON FACETE NOBIS CALCITRARE VESTRVM PERINAEVM

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,831 posts

Posted 27 February 2013 - 09:39 PM

These are not players we have shown interest in. These are simply some of the players who are projected to go in the top 10, who if they drop to 14 would be considered BPA at their respective positions. Truth is we likely won't have a huge choice if any and maybe only 1 of these guys would even be available so making a list of all five as if they all would be available is stupid even for the off-season. If all five were available then we would still have to see who we picked up in free agency and who we dumped before you could make a semi-intelligent choice.

not exactlly Star and Bjron are the only constant top 10's in the group, Bjorn wont be a need if we plan on keeping Hardy though, and Star would only fall to us if someone gets scared about his possible heart condition, but outside of those two the rest as far as I can tell are projected 10-20 so that's our area.

#19 panther4life

panther4life

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,654 posts

Posted 27 February 2013 - 09:47 PM

anyone else remember when Mark Carrier said we would have taken Barron over Kuechly last year?

#20 panthers55

panthers55

    Starting all over again

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,459 posts
  • LocationAt the lake

Posted 27 February 2013 - 10:05 PM

not exactlly Star and Bjron are the only constant top 10's in the group, Bjorn wont be a need if we plan on keeping Hardy though, and Star would only fall to us if someone gets scared about his possible heart condition, but outside of those two the rest as far as I can tell are projected 10-20 so that's our area.


You must be looking at something different that I am.

Here is a draft which was updated today which shows Warmack at 2, Werner at 5, and Patterson at 10. At our pick we are supposed to take Rhodes at 14. Star is projected at 15 and Vaccaro is 18. So using the BPA philosophy assuming our board looks like theirs, you would pick Warmack first, Werner 2nd, Patterson 3rd. You wouldn't pick Star or Vaccaro because they aren't BPAs.
http://www.cbssports...rospectrankings

Here is another from Gil Brandt who is a smart guy. This one has Werner at 2, Warmack at 10, Vacarro at 15, Patterson at 16, and Star is not even in the first round.
In this case it would be Werner hands down with Warmack second. Everyone else wouldn't necessary be BPA and picked by us at all even if available,

http://www.nfl.com/d...l-brandt/165254

And the problem is that all these drafts and your opinion is based on need not BPA. Why doesn't anyone understand what BPA means. BPA is best player available regardless of need...............

#21 Clicheking

Clicheking

    Mack of the year

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,862 posts
  • Location910

Posted 27 February 2013 - 10:08 PM

Xavier Rhodes
Kewann Short
Keenan Allen

If those guys arent avaikble. My choice in that order. Subject to change

#22 C47

C47

    89...Panther for Life...

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,955 posts

Posted 27 February 2013 - 10:13 PM

Lol PAC 12


That's right the Pac offenses do suck....oh wait.....

#23 Bwood

Bwood

    It's all about the

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,491 posts
  • LocationSouthern California

Posted 27 February 2013 - 10:18 PM

if by new name to emerge you mean that you are throwing his name out there as a player you want o see us pick up? I could care less, focus should be put solely on players we have shown interest in and not wishful thinking.

upon further review yeah, so you want us to spend the 15 pick on someone projected to go into the second, he's considered a late first at best because of his speed, also defensive player from the pac 12? "rolls eyes" would almost rather get a 2nd string player from LSU that barely made the team


You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about so I won't even waste my time. Ill remember to quote your old uneducated ass when Trufant goes top 15.

#24 C47

C47

    89...Panther for Life...

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,955 posts

Posted 27 February 2013 - 10:24 PM

if by new name to emerge you mean that you are throwing his name out there as a player you want o see us pick up? I could care less, focus should be put solely on players we have shown interest in and not wishful thinking.

upon further review yeah, so you want us to spend the 15 pick on someone projected to go into the second, he's considered a late first at best because of his speed, also defensive player from the pac 12? "rolls eyes" would almost rather get a 2nd string player from LSU that barely made the team


This statement is beyond moronic...

#25 Kevin Greene

Kevin Greene

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,474 posts

Posted 27 February 2013 - 10:36 PM

Lol PAC 12


Come on now.
Our Pro Bowl Center would like a word with you.

Posted Image

Assume the NT position SCP.



.

#26 Bwood

Bwood

    It's all about the

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,491 posts
  • LocationSouthern California

Posted 27 February 2013 - 10:41 PM

All the non-college football watching posters are standing out right now.

#27 Cracka McNasty

Cracka McNasty

    WWNPHD?

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,581 posts

Posted 27 February 2013 - 11:39 PM

I'm going with "Yes"

I'm down for whoever at any one of these positions:

DT, OL, WR, DB

any of those, and I'm golden

#28 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    HORNETS 2014

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,111 posts
  • LocationKurby

Posted 27 February 2013 - 11:40 PM

Star
Warmack/Vaccaro
Patterson
Werner

#29 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    HORNETS 2014

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,111 posts
  • LocationKurby

Posted 27 February 2013 - 11:40 PM

Can never have too many DEs right? NYG philosophy.

(1) DE
(2) WR

#30 LinvilleGorge

LinvilleGorge

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,371 posts

Posted 27 February 2013 - 11:42 PM

anyone else remember when Mark Carrier said we would have taken Barron over Kuechly last year?


Thank you Tampa Bay!


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com - IP Content Design by Joshua Tree / TitansReport.