Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

TruthVsComfort

North Carolina bill would add Bible study at public schools

60 posts in this topic

I've never met an "agressive" atheist in person only on the internet. However I think that term might need to be defined.

ag·gres·sive

1.

characterized by or tending toward unprovoked offensives, attacks, invasions, or the like; militantly forward or menacing: aggressive acts against a neighboring country.

2.

making an all-out effort to win or succeed; competitive: an aggressive basketball player.

3.

vigorously energetic, especially in the use of initiative and forcefulness: an aggressive salesperson.

4.

boldly assertive and forward; pushy: an aggressive driver.

5.

emphasizing maximum growth and capital gains over quality, security, and income: an aggressive mutual fund.

a·the·ist

noun

a person who denies or disbelieves the existence of a supreme being or beings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

right... that's the rub... we aren't studying christianity as a religion amongst many, we're studying it as the truth... which is why we've left out the apocrypha and other rejected books. It's a subtle difference but it speaks volumes.

With what I said earlier about what I took in high school being said,

I took OT in college, too, and it was perhaps an even bigger step away from sunday school.

It was much more open about apocryphal and pseudepigraphal works, difference in transcriptions, scribes that seemed to add stuff on their own, and subtlelties in translation.

I remember one time, my professor even went out of her way to criticize Matthew for misinterpreting one of the prophet's writings (I think it was Jeremiah) about the coming of the Messiah.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've never met an "agressive" atheist in person only on the internet. However I think that term might need to be defined.

Well, mmmbeans was the one who introduced the term to the discussion, but anyone can be aggressive in promoting their beliefs, surely you can see this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From my perspective, I would not want the bible taught in school except as an exploration of literature.

The church alone should be in charge of its teachings and precepts. Many who think prayer or bible teachings in school are a good thing should sit back for a moment, examine what they believe and ask themselves if they entrust some of their long held beliefs to be taught by the "state". Doubt it.

I hope that teachings are not anti Christian in schools but do not need the state to attempt to teach my kids about prayer or the bible. That is the parents and churches job. Schools have enough trouble trying to teach a kid to read.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would actually like to see a class in high schools that compare and contrast different religions.

Would provide an interesting perspective.....I took one in college and it was actually very interesting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i have no problem with this as long as it remains elective

then we'd have all the future child molesters and weirdo creeps in one class

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With what I said earlier about what I took in high school being said,

I took OT in college, too, and it was perhaps an even bigger step away from sunday school.

It was much more open about apocryphal and pseudepigraphal works, difference in transcriptions, scribes that seemed to add stuff on their own, and subtlelties in translation.

I remember one time, my professor even went out of her way to criticize Matthew for misinterpreting one of the prophet's writings (I think it was Jeremiah) about the coming of the Messiah.

right... really interesting stuff... i just don't see that level of subtlety being implemented in a high-school curriculum... when you start breaking down and discussing latitude in translation, the faithful often see it as breaking down of their belief systems... When you omit these things, you're being dishonest about the history of the source material.

TL;DR It's really hard to discuss these things honestly without hurting someone's feelings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have a problem with the studying of the bible as a text but why not study all religious texts. That way our children have an understanding of all religions. That way they can form their own opinions. I mean don't most of these texts teach the same things anyway?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would actually like to see a class in high schools that compare and contrast different religions.

Would provide an interesting perspective.....I took one in college and it was actually very interesting.

I agree.

I tried taking one in college. Unfortunately it didn't go so well. I noticed about 1/3 of the class had bibles on their desk when I got to class the first day. On the second day, we started exploring the historical context of the religions and their similarities and the bible kids started arguing with the professor and quoting scripture.

Professor was like "uhh this isn't a theology class. We are not here to debate doctrine." He was respectful, but obviously annoyed. They continued doing this with pretty much every topic covered. I dropped it after the third class because it was obvious nobody was going to get anything meaningful out of the class.

Shame, I really thought it would be an interesting class to take.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you not read the part that said they would only be "electives"? Only way it would be ramming down anyone's throat is to make it a required course.

As a required course....hell no.

As an elective....meh.

If a law was passed to put vegetarian foods on every restaurant menu it wouldn't matter that no one ate it a certain establishments.

Or

If the state passed a law allowing statues of Ganesh at rest areas it wouldn't matter that no one was forced to genuflect before using the facilities.

The fact that its optional doesn't change the fact that this is a line the state has no business crossing.

Religion has NO place in public schools period. Its not good for the state to be seen to be endorsing a given religious belief, and Its not good for the kids who should have those lessons taught to them by representatives of their specific church.

As a Christian, I find it completely and utterly offensive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites