Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

How much over the cap are we really?as low as 3-5 million?


  • Please log in to reply
94 replies to this topic

#16 Gallagher

Gallagher

    Never Doubt Davis

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,260 posts
  • LocationLos Angeles, CA

Posted 28 February 2013 - 09:56 PM

Great news. While it's nice to imagine us restructuring Gamble, along with Gross, Beason and Williams, to be able to keep #20, I still think it's the best move for us to cut him, pick up a cheap vet FA corner (or draft one with our first two picks) and then have more wiggle room in free agency.

#17 L-TownCat

L-TownCat

    Baptized In The Blood Of Saints

  • ALL-PRO
  • 4,956 posts

Posted 28 February 2013 - 11:27 PM

OOOOOHHHH MMMMYYYYYYY GGGGGOOOOOOODDDDD!!!


Your telling me that all the people who's jimmies have been in full on rustle were just over reacting?


Your telling me that our cap situation is nearly solved for this upcoming free agency period almost 2 weeks from the starting line?


What sorcery is this?

#18 Squirrel

Squirrel

    Drink a beer and relax

  • ALL-PRO
  • 12,523 posts

Posted 28 February 2013 - 11:39 PM

Still need about 15 million on top of that for free agency and draft picks

#19 JawnyBlaze

JawnyBlaze

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,338 posts

Posted 01 March 2013 - 04:41 AM

Draft picks will only be $4-5 mil at most, doubt we spend $10 mil in free agency

#20 Catalyst

Catalyst

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,107 posts
  • LocationMorehead City

Posted 01 March 2013 - 04:49 AM

Mike Wallace come on down... or something.

#21 carpanfan96

carpanfan96

    play hard, hit harder

  • ALL-PRO
  • 11,389 posts
  • LocationConcord, NC

Posted 01 March 2013 - 06:46 AM

Team was at 136 million counting dead money, Add in the incentives that players hit plus Stewarts extra 200k and it pretty much nullifies the 3 million carry over. Which puts the team after Kalil savings at around 133 million or roughly 10 million over the cap.

Ron Edwards and Gamble will be cut putting the team right under the cap by about 500k or so.

#22 Gucci Mane

Gucci Mane

    Trap God

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,793 posts
  • LocationKitchen

Posted 01 March 2013 - 07:46 AM

WE DONT NEED GAMBLE ANYMORE HE IS PASSED HIS PRODUCTIVE YEARS.

#23 SooSlow84

SooSlow84

    HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,246 posts
  • LocationYour mother's basement

Posted 01 March 2013 - 09:32 AM

We are now 8 mil over cap, people.
As I said in another thread, I trust shefter's numbers. @AdamSchefter: Teams with least room this am: CAR $8 mil over cap; NO $5.5 mil over; WASH $3 mil over; AZ $1.2 mil over; OAK $800k over.

#24 SuperMan

SuperMan

    I'm always holding back.

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,265 posts
  • LocationRaleigh,NC

Posted 01 March 2013 - 09:46 AM

We are now 8 mil over cap, people.
As I said in another thread, I trust shefter's numbers. @AdamSchefter: Teams with least room this am: CAR $8 mil over cap; NO $5.5 mil over; WASH $3 mil over; AZ $1.2 mil over; OAK $800k over.


No one cares who you trust.... you have like 60 posts and you waste your life arguing with Joe Person on the one occasion when he was right.....

#25 TylerVagyler

TylerVagyler

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,050 posts

Posted 01 March 2013 - 09:49 AM

I don't understand how our team cap just mysteriously keeps decreasing lol

8 mil over sounds way more accurate.

#26 SooSlow84

SooSlow84

    HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,246 posts
  • LocationYour mother's basement

Posted 01 March 2013 - 09:55 AM

No one cares who you trust.... you have like 60 posts and you waste your life arguing with Joe Person on the one occasion when he was right.....


I don't usually like repeating myself, but for the stupid, I feel as though they deserve another shot.

Joe person originally wrote an article that we were 10 mil over the cap and claimed this was with an expected cap number of 121 mil

Last night he claimed we were 9 mil over the cap with an expected cap number of 123 mil.

I can see you're not that bright by your lack of patience and aggression so we will break this down for you and others with a double digit IQ.

121 mil cap=10 mil over
123 mil cap=9 mil over

He was off by a million.

#27 TylerVagyler

TylerVagyler

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,050 posts

Posted 01 March 2013 - 09:56 AM

Or he could just rounding his numbers to make it easier?

You guys getting all worked up about this is ridiculous

#28 SooSlow84

SooSlow84

    HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,246 posts
  • LocationYour mother's basement

Posted 01 March 2013 - 09:58 AM

Or he could just rounding his numbers to make it easier?

You guys getting all worked up about this is ridiculous

I thought that was the case too, but he then claimed he had been reporting a 122 mil cap number. I quoted the article where he specifically stated 121 mil and he ignored me afterwards.

#29 TylerVagyler

TylerVagyler

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,050 posts

Posted 01 March 2013 - 09:59 AM

Either way, he is more accurate than the idiot who wrote the article in the OP.

#30 SuperMan

SuperMan

    I'm always holding back.

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,265 posts
  • LocationRaleigh,NC

Posted 01 March 2013 - 10:00 AM

I don't usually like repeating myself, but for the stupid, I feel as though they deserve another shot.

Joe person originally wrote an article that we were 10 mil over the cap and claimed this was with an expected cap number of 121 mil

Last night he claimed we were 9 mil over the cap with an expected cap number of 123 mil.

I can see you're not that bright by your lack of patience and aggression so we will break this down for you and others with a double digit IQ.

121 mil cap=10 mil over
123 mil cap=9 mil over

He was off by a million.



IQ insults from a semi-sentient being who has so little to do with his pathetic existence that he argues with Person.... That is laughable.


When you only take into account the top 51 contracts (which is what he was doing in one he would be correct).


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com