Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

How much over the cap are we really?as low as 3-5 million?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
94 replies to this topic

#25 TylerVagyler

TylerVagyler

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 02-January 11
  • posts: 2,559
  • Reputation: 871
SUPPORTER

Posted 01 March 2013 - 09:49 AM

I don't understand how our team cap just mysteriously keeps decreasing lol

8 mil over sounds way more accurate.

#26 Frank Hollywood

Frank Hollywood

    Ultimate Troll

  • Joined: 13-April 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,794
  • Reputation: 799
HUDDLER

Posted 01 March 2013 - 09:55 AM

No one cares who you trust.... you have like 60 posts and you waste your life arguing with Joe Person on the one occasion when he was right.....


I don't usually like repeating myself, but for the stupid, I feel as though they deserve another shot.

Joe person originally wrote an article that we were 10 mil over the cap and claimed this was with an expected cap number of 121 mil

Last night he claimed we were 9 mil over the cap with an expected cap number of 123 mil.

I can see you're not that bright by your lack of patience and aggression so we will break this down for you and others with a double digit IQ.

121 mil cap=10 mil over
123 mil cap=9 mil over

He was off by a million.

#27 TylerVagyler

TylerVagyler

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 02-January 11
  • posts: 2,559
  • Reputation: 871
SUPPORTER

Posted 01 March 2013 - 09:56 AM

Or he could just rounding his numbers to make it easier?

You guys getting all worked up about this is ridiculous

#28 Frank Hollywood

Frank Hollywood

    Ultimate Troll

  • Joined: 13-April 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,794
  • Reputation: 799
HUDDLER

Posted 01 March 2013 - 09:58 AM

Or he could just rounding his numbers to make it easier?

You guys getting all worked up about this is ridiculous

I thought that was the case too, but he then claimed he had been reporting a 122 mil cap number. I quoted the article where he specifically stated 121 mil and he ignored me afterwards.

#29 TylerVagyler

TylerVagyler

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 02-January 11
  • posts: 2,559
  • Reputation: 871
SUPPORTER

Posted 01 March 2013 - 09:59 AM

Either way, he is more accurate than the idiot who wrote the article in the OP.

#30 SuperMan

SuperMan

    I'm always holding back.

  • Joined: 12-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,265
  • Reputation: 141
HUDDLER

Posted 01 March 2013 - 10:00 AM

I don't usually like repeating myself, but for the stupid, I feel as though they deserve another shot.

Joe person originally wrote an article that we were 10 mil over the cap and claimed this was with an expected cap number of 121 mil

Last night he claimed we were 9 mil over the cap with an expected cap number of 123 mil.

I can see you're not that bright by your lack of patience and aggression so we will break this down for you and others with a double digit IQ.

121 mil cap=10 mil over
123 mil cap=9 mil over

He was off by a million.



IQ insults from a semi-sentient being who has so little to do with his pathetic existence that he argues with Person.... That is laughable.


When you only take into account the top 51 contracts (which is what he was doing in one he would be correct).

#31 Frank Hollywood

Frank Hollywood

    Ultimate Troll

  • Joined: 13-April 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,794
  • Reputation: 799
HUDDLER

Posted 01 March 2013 - 10:00 AM

Either way, he is more accurate than the idiot who wrote the article in the OP.

Lol, the only thing I can think of is maybe this doesnt account for the extra needed to sign draft picks? Perhaps the op is right but that isn't factored in yet? Just a guess.

#32 TylerVagyler

TylerVagyler

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 02-January 11
  • posts: 2,559
  • Reputation: 871
SUPPORTER

Posted 01 March 2013 - 10:02 AM

Lol, the only thing I can think of is maybe this doesnt account for the extra needed to sign draft picks? Perhaps the op is right but that isn't factored in yet? Just a guess.


Draft picks are not factored in at this point.

#33 Frank Hollywood

Frank Hollywood

    Ultimate Troll

  • Joined: 13-April 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,794
  • Reputation: 799
HUDDLER

Posted 01 March 2013 - 10:02 AM

IQ insults from a semi-sentient being who has so little to do with his pathetic existence that he argues with Person.... That is laughable.


When you only take into account the top 51 contracts (which is what he was doing in one he would be correct).

What's funny is I'm a worthless being because I argue with person, yet you're here arguing with me. What does that make you??

Ill wait...

#34 Frank Hollywood

Frank Hollywood

    Ultimate Troll

  • Joined: 13-April 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,794
  • Reputation: 799
HUDDLER

Posted 01 March 2013 - 10:05 AM

How hard is it for superman to see that person claimed he was using a 122mil cap estimate and I show he was using a 121 mil cap estimate. How is that not wrong? Add in the fact that shefter is reporting we are 8 mil over (1 mil less than what person is saying) and it makes sense that person is off by a million

Logic must be your kryptonite.

#35 carp24000

carp24000

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 17-January 12
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 495
  • Reputation: 353
HUDDLER

Posted 01 March 2013 - 10:06 AM

So say we are -9 million:

Release Gamble: Savings of $10.9 million - Adjusted Cap: +1.9 million
Release Ron Edwards: Savings of $3.3 million - Adjusted Cap: +5.2 Million
Restructure Gross, Beason, Deangelo: Savings of 5 million combined - Adjusted Cap: +10 million.

Good for some free agent activity and signing of rookies, etc.

#36 Frank Hollywood

Frank Hollywood

    Ultimate Troll

  • Joined: 13-April 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,794
  • Reputation: 799
HUDDLER

Posted 01 March 2013 - 10:08 AM

So say we are -9 million:

Release Gamble: Savings of $10.9 million - Adjusted Cap: +1.9 million
Release Ron Edwards: Savings of $3.3 million - Adjusted Cap: +5.2 Million
Restructure Gross, Beason, Deangelo: Savings of 5 million combined - Adjusted Cap: +10 million.

Good for some free agent activity and signing of rookies, etc.


You have to still pay them their guaranteed money. Your numbers are off. Gamble saves us 7.9 I believe.