Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Report: Panthers expected to release Gamble


  • Please log in to reply
21 replies to this topic

#11 rscott94

rscott94

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 01-January 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,056
  • Reputation: 628
HUDDLER

Posted 28 February 2013 - 10:19 PM

Posted Image

#12 Stroupe-a-loop

Stroupe-a-loop

    Señor Member

  • Joined: 06-September 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,672
  • Reputation: 393
HUDDLER

Posted 28 February 2013 - 10:22 PM

but what if you hurt your back backing onto a dick?


You're doing it wrong unless you are a particularly fierce power bottom.

#13 Stroupe-a-loop

Stroupe-a-loop

    Señor Member

  • Joined: 06-September 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,672
  • Reputation: 393
HUDDLER

Posted 28 February 2013 - 10:23 PM

Anyway, I expect Gettleman will do this so he can pursue some targets in free agency he likes. It seems like we could get under without cutting him. It also stands to reason that the team could have soured on Gamble.

#14 rscott94

rscott94

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 01-January 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,056
  • Reputation: 628
HUDDLER

Posted 28 February 2013 - 10:27 PM

Anyway, I expect Gettleman will do this so he can pursue some targets in free agency he likes. It seems like we could get under without cutting him. It also stands to reason that the team could have soured on Gamble.

We're currently over 9 million so cutting Gamble gets us right under the cap... Mr. Gettleman would still have to make moves if he wanted to purse any FA

#15 Stroupe-a-loop

Stroupe-a-loop

    Señor Member

  • Joined: 06-September 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,672
  • Reputation: 393
HUDDLER

Posted 28 February 2013 - 10:33 PM

We're currently over 9 million so cutting Gamble gets us right under the cap... Mr. Gettleman would still have to make moves if he wanted to purse any FA

Not according to various other posts. After the Kalil, Nakamura restructures, the higher than projected cap for this season and other whatnot, some sources have us 3 to 5 million over. Which could basically be fixed with a restructure of one or two guys.

Even if we were still 9 million over, we could get there without cutting Gamble. If what this says is true, the team either wants some free agents more than Gamble, or doesn't want him moving forward period.

#16 rscott94

rscott94

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 01-January 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,056
  • Reputation: 628
HUDDLER

Posted 28 February 2013 - 10:35 PM

Not according to various other posts. After the Kalil, Nakamura restructures, the higher than projected cap for this season and other whatnot, some sources have us 3 to 5 million over. Which could basically be fixed with a restructure of one or two guys.

Even if we were still 9 million over, we could get there without cutting Gamble. If what this says is true, the team either wants some free agents more than Gamble, or doesn't want him moving forward period.

Puts #Panthers about $9M over. RT @mortreport The $123.9 mill cap number includes .9 in minimum salary benefits do call it $123 mill per tm.

Joe Person@josephperson
.@danism28 Ron Edwards will be cut. Possible restructure w/ Gross.


#17 Stroupe-a-loop

Stroupe-a-loop

    Señor Member

  • Joined: 06-September 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,672
  • Reputation: 393
HUDDLER

Posted 28 February 2013 - 10:46 PM

Puts #Panthers about $9M over. RT @mortreport The $123.9 mill cap number includes .9 in minimum salary benefits do call it $123 mill per tm.

Joe Person@josephperson
.@danism28 Ron Edwards will be cut. Possible restructure w/ Gross.


Right, cutting Ron gets around 2 million in cap space. I don't know how much they'll renegotiate with Gross, but you'd figure at least 2 to 3 million, maybe as much as 5. Which leaves about 10 million more you'd have to restructure to get under and sign rookies. You re-work the Johnson, Beason, Olsen, or Godfrey deals and it's not hard to get there.

If what the article says is true, we aren't even trying to negotiate about reducing his cap number, we are just cutting ties. Which tells me that we just don't want him. Maybe they see him as an injury risk/malcontent or just really want to plug some other holes, but it sounds like they're moving on.

#18 Growl

Growl

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 21-March 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,694
  • Reputation: 4,097
HUDDLER

Posted 28 February 2013 - 10:50 PM

Yeeeeahhh getting this kind of information and then trying to dispute it with Chris Mortenson comments is like trying to deny the sky is blue by asking a color blind pug for it's opinion.

#19 Gabeking

Gabeking

    Member

  • Joined: 27-February 10
  • posts: 3,505
  • Reputation: 1,643
SUPPORTER

Posted 28 February 2013 - 11:01 PM

REPORT

#20 TheGreatestOfAllTimeCam

TheGreatestOfAllTimeCam

    Cam Nut Hugger

  • Joined: 27-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,637
  • Reputation: 953
HUDDLER

Posted 28 February 2013 - 11:51 PM

This sucks... One of my favorite Panthers ever


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users