Jump to content





Photo
* - - - - 1 votes

Louis Murphy


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
49 replies to this topic

#49 pilot2011

pilot2011

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 07-May 12
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 373
  • Reputation: 158
HUDDLER

Posted 12 March 2013 - 07:05 AM

Outside of 89, Lafell, and Pilares, we need some big time receiver help... And with Gamble gone and looking like Captain will follow, what is the highest priority now? receiver, corner, dt, og ??

#50 MHS831

MHS831

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 08-June 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,399
  • Reputation: 3,080
HUDDLER

Posted 12 March 2013 - 09:28 AM

Outside of 89, Lafell, and Pilares, we need some big time receiver help... And with Gamble gone and looking like Captain will follow, what is the highest priority now? receiver, corner, dt, og ??

I wonder....

Do we think we have something in Lamont Bryant (WR) on the PS? Do we think Gettis can step up in year 4?

I think we need a WR, but DT has to be our #1 priority, with CB a close second. RG is third, in my opinion, followed by WR and S.

Could we go to battle with what we have at DT? No,
Could we go to battle with what we have at CB? No,
Could we go to battle with what we have at RG? No,
Could we go to battle with what we have at WR? Yes.
Could we go to battle with what we have at S? Yes

If the question is, "Could we win the battle" with what we have at each of the positions mentioned, I would say "no" to each. We could win the game, but the individual matchups at these positions would be losses.