Is the BPA philosophy really valid given the rookie contracts (CBA)?
Posted 03 March 2013 - 04:39 AM
For example,are Kenny V at safety and Chance Womack at guard elite enough to draft over positions like CB left OT,and DE which are so costly in the FA market ?. This may mean nothing but I have never seen such a deep draft for the dt position at the same time as an extremely deep FA market for DT. Could this new CBA agreement be a way to purge these outrageous contracts at expensive positions ?
Posted 03 March 2013 - 08:40 AM
Posted 03 March 2013 - 08:48 AM
Posted 03 March 2013 - 08:57 AM
Posted 03 March 2013 - 09:16 AM
Posted 03 March 2013 - 09:49 AM
Financial incentive caused by the rookie wage scale is a fantastic new concept! I am sure smart GM's are going to take full advantage of this. I am confident that Gettleman will consider this. He has not given me a reason to doubt yet.
- jarhead PIE'd this
Posted 03 March 2013 - 10:03 AM
Need, scheme, etc all distort who is BPA for a specific team
Posted 03 March 2013 - 10:39 AM
- Leeroy Jenkins PhD PIE'd this
Posted 03 March 2013 - 11:17 AM
Posted 03 March 2013 - 11:41 AM
Whatever decision we make, it will probably be the wrong one. That's the Panther way.
Thats right. We always screw up, particularly in the first. Especially lately..... Wait........ what?????
We had the offensive rookie player of the year 2 years ago and this past year the defensive rookie of the year.......................
As Emily Latella would say..........
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users