Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

SCP

Which 2013 O-Line combo gives us the best chance to win more that 7 games?

86 posts in this topic

Johnson-Silatolu-Kalil-Vasquez-Gross

^Would be nice

why not put the rookie at RT and ease him in like we did with Gross in 03?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

why not put the rookie at RT and ease him in like we did with Gross in 03?

Would probably need to since Silatolu is still learning. Probably not the best thing to put a rookie beside Amini.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you really want to go all in on the OLine...

Gross - Larry Warford - Kalil - Brandon Moore - Lane Johnson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

whats with the BELL hating... if you have a cheap and above average RT why will you replace him. we have a lot of positions to address that have way below average players at that position. BELL is way better than an Free agent Tackle we can afford

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

6 or 2... I really like Warmack but doubt he is there. Also like Lane Johnson and he might be there, if he is he needs to be the pick. He has the athletic tools to be a LT and to draft a LT is more cost efficient

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Easily 6...Bell is good, just not good enough at this point

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Definitely #4.

Putting a rookie next to Silatolu would not be the smartest move.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gross

Amini

Kalil

Levitre in FA or Kyle Long via draft

Bell

Is my hope

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Six. Or 2, but I don't see it happening.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Of course, he's so massive he has his own gravitational pull. 
    • You miss the point. Taylor was here before. We picked him because of what he could do for our wide receivers not because he had some great knowledge no other person had on the staff. Shula and Rivera and Gettleman studied multiple college systems for months before signing Taylor or drafting McCaffrey or Curtis and would have drafted the same whether Taylor was here or not. They liked the way Taylor developed McCaffrey which showed his talent but Stanford's offense wasn't Taylors idea or unique to him. Shula has a connection to Taylor as early as when Shula was at Alabama.  The debate was whether Taylor was chosen to replace Shula because Shula didn't know what to do to run a college offense and if he screwed up Taylor would replace him. And that Taylor was the reason and most influential in getting McCaffrey. I said it wasn't even close to the truth and this plan predated Taylor and was more thorough and we'll thought out. Everything since then just confirms I was right once again like usual.  
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      18,243
    • Most Online
      2,867

    Newest Member
    GSO Goat
    Joined