Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

most overvalued and undervalued carolina panthers per pff


  • Please log in to reply
26 replies to this topic

#21 top dawg

top dawg

    The Creative Cat

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,334
  • Reputation: 2,940
  • LocationWITHIN MY MIND'S EYE
HUDDLER

Posted 05 March 2013 - 09:33 AM

Hard to win in the NFL...it terms of winning it all. So many cards have to fall in your favor. Almost need luck.

GB the last 3 years.

Superbowl Champs (10-6)
15-1
11-5

I would say there formula of not giving a poo about who runs for them is working pretty well. Yet from our loser seat we suggest they need to be a tad more like us for success?

Carolina and there stacked backfield hasn't posted a winning record in that time period


You're looking at it a little too simplistically. I admit that they have won a lot of games, including a championship, but ultimately for the last couple of seasons during the big dance, they have been watching from the house like 30 other teams. The Panthers problems during the last three years has been about rebuilding on and off the field. We'll see how the Packers fare with Jennings, Woodson and Finley gone bye-bye. They will meet teams like the 49ers and Seahawks in the playoffs, be outed for their lack of a strong running game, and fall like a house of cards year after year.

And, by the way, we haven't looked like anything the last couple of years because we have been finding ourselves, and it has showed. But hopefully this year things will begin to come together.

Remember when we almost kicked their ass a couple of seasons ago? I submit to you that if we get another WR, and recommit to the running game, we will finish the job next time.

#22 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 27,137
  • Reputation: 5,290
Moderators

Posted 05 March 2013 - 09:42 AM

You're looking at it a little too simplistically. I admit that they have won a lot of games, including a championship, but ultimately for the last couple of seasons during the big dance, they have been watching from the house like 30 other teams. The Panthers problems during the last three years has been about rebuilding on and off the field. We'll see how the Packers fare with Jennings, Woodson and Finley gone bye-bye. They will meet teams like the 49ers and Seahawks in the playoffs, be outed for their lack of a strong running game, and fall like a house of cards year after year.

And, by the way, we haven't looked like anything the last couple of years because we have been finding ourselves, and it has showed. But hopefully this year things will begin to come together.

Remember when we almost kicked their ass a couple of seasons ago? I submit to you that if we get another WR, and recommit to the running game, we will finish the job next time.


They went 15-1 in 2011 and appeared to be the hands down favorite. I think sitting players and getting out of that dominant rythem was what cost them.....not their backfield. They just dropped balls.... they weren't stopped.

Hard to win it all in the NFL....poo happens.

#23 Leeroy Jenkins PhD

Leeroy Jenkins PhD

    HCIC

  • Joined: 24-January 10
  • posts: 2,079
  • Reputation: 1,034
  • LocationHouston Texas
SUPPORTER

Posted 05 March 2013 - 09:56 AM

I see a number of "formulas" working in the NFL right now. This is a serious oversimplification

1. dominant, take away defense paired with a ball control (RB high priority) offense. The teams that can lull you to sleep by running the ball somewhat consistantly and then picking up large chunk yardage. (See Ravens)

2. Pass happy and porous yet opportunistic defense. (Low priority RB) These teams tend to have pocket passers and will outscore you. The defense tends to play for the turn over. (Patriots, Packers, Saints)

3. New system, needs defining. Mobile QB, shut down defense. Roll of RB unclear with QB picking up majority of rushing yards. (see 49ers, Seahawks, Panthers)


* Trying to put to words what is in my head is more difficult than I thought.

#24 Doc Holiday

Doc Holiday

    NON FACETE NOBIS CALCITRARE VESTRVM PERINAEVM

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,219
  • Reputation: 873
HUDDLER

Posted 05 March 2013 - 12:05 PM

But in Madden I re-invented my entire roster to all All Pro's in a matter of minutes...

Ha! I do miss the days when people would post like that and be serious.

#25 kman72

kman72

    Sports Maniac

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,075
  • Reputation: 100
  • LocationNC
HUDDLER

Posted 05 March 2013 - 01:17 PM

I don't put Gross that high, if we didn't have him who else on roster could play LT? When is the last time we had a backup LT on roster and don't dare say Travelle Wharton sliding over from guard lol

#26 Happy Panther

Happy Panther

    Now even funnier.

  • Joined: 16-March 09
  • posts: 18,501
  • Reputation: 3,467
SUPPORTER

Posted 05 March 2013 - 01:30 PM

If D-Will or J-Stew were a full time RB then they would probably be worth the money

#27 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 27,137
  • Reputation: 5,290
Moderators

Posted 05 March 2013 - 01:33 PM

If D-Will or J-Stew were a full time RB then they would probably be worth the money

If Godfrey could tackle he would be worth is...


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users