Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Panthro

Wealth Inequality in America

271 posts in this topic

I made a 1200 or so on the SAT when I was on the 7th grade btw.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^^ why not say delusions of grandeur

isn't that the same thing?

i am not a psychologist but from what i understand GD is associated with mental illness and encompasses the gamut of delusions while dunning-kruger relates to a more common phenomenon (at least in american society)

anyway the dunning-kruger thing is a bit tongue in cheek as i don't doubt that madhatter is good at finance or whatever. the problem is that he, and others, seem to believe that experience in a particular niche sector and knowledge within a limited scope of academia qualifies them to not only weigh in on real things in other fields that they've never actually studied, but to also ignore (and/or insult) those who do in fact have a working knowledge of the given subject. now keep in mind i don't think you have to have a degree within a given field before you can comment on it, but you will in fact have to substantiate your claims (particularly when they run counter to the bulk of data and theory). if your defense of "hurrdurr welfare is for lazy people" is limited to "um i got a 1500 on the SAT therefore....." or "what are you some kind of ivory tower elitist" then it's safe to say that you're completely full of poo and need to stop posting about things which you have not even made the attempt to understand

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i am not a psychologist but from what i understand GD is associated with mental illness and encompasses the gamut of delusions while dunning-kruger relates to a more common phenomenon (at least in american society)

anyway the dunning-kruger thing is a bit tongue in cheek as i don't doubt that madhatter is good at finance or whatever. the problem is that he, and others, seem to believe that experience in a particular niche sector and knowledge within a limited scope of academia qualifies them to not only weigh in on real things in other fields that they've never actually studied, but to also ignore (and/or insult) those who do in fact have a working knowledge of the given subject. now keep in mind i don't think you have to have a degree within a given field before you can comment on it, but you will in fact have to substantiate your claims (particularly when they run counter to the bulk of data and theory). if your defense of "hurrdurr welfare is for lazy people" is limited to "um i got a 1500 on the SAT therefore....." or "what are you some kind of ivory tower elitist" then it's safe to say that you're completely full of poo and need to stop posting about things which you have not even made the attempt to understand

Yeah I meant like colloquially. Like if I say so-in-so is anti-social I usually mean they're being a recluse, I don't mean they're a criminal since that's pretty much the psychological definition.

I don't get the real world meme lately. You might as well not even post if you're gonna bring that into every thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

human flight? um hello mr ivory tower elitist, here in the real world ppl can't fly. i'm just sitting here flapping my arms and not getting anywhere and that's the REAL WORLD so you can take your "aeronautics" and shove it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

theory. reality. ancedotal and outliers. metrics and conjecture.

mix and match to your delight. at some point you have to make the rubber meet the road and do something besides flexing your 2.1 Psych Major to compensate your lack of economic understanding.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

theory. reality. ancedotal and outliers. metrics and conjecture.

mix and match to your delight. at some point you have to make the rubber meet the road and do something besides flexing your 2.1 Psych Major to compensate your lack of economic understanding.

i presume you're speaking from experience

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

my diagnosis of you would not be applicable to this thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i am not a psychologist but from what i understand GD is associated with mental illness and encompasses the gamut of delusions while dunning-kruger relates to a more common phenomenon (at least in american society)

anyway the dunning-kruger thing is a bit tongue in cheek as i don't doubt that madhatter is good at finance or whatever. the problem is that he, and others, seem to believe that experience in a particular niche sector and knowledge within a limited scope of academia qualifies them to not only weigh in on real things in other fields that they've never actually studied, but to also ignore (and/or insult) those who do in fact have a working knowledge of the given subject. now keep in mind i don't think you have to have a degree within a given field before you can comment on it, but you will in fact have to substantiate your claims (particularly when they run counter to the bulk of data and theory). if your defense of "hurrdurr welfare is for lazy people" is limited to "um i got a 1500 on the SAT therefore....." or "what are you some kind of ivory tower elitist" then it's safe to say that you're completely full of poo and need to stop posting about things which you have not even made the attempt to understand

See the problem is that you do in fact think that you're better and above everyone here... you've flat out said so and your attitude and tone suggests it in every single post you make.

You can deride all you want "real world experience"... I've seen it over and over by people like you who do in fact have that "high and mighty" attitude bc they've got this or that degree... as if that makes them the end-all-be-all of opinions.

The fact is I don't think you have any real life experience... as in zero... and don't get me wrong, there's absolutely nothing wrong with getting all the degrees in the world and studying all your life, that's not what I'm saying... what I'm saying is, don't look down on others, as you obviously do, for not having academic credentials... it will bite you in the ass or you'll look like an ass, which in your case, I'd say it's probably both.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

but you guys he read something in a book that his professor reiterated loudly! it must be true!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites