Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Panthro

Wealth Inequality in America

271 posts in this topic

no, you made an assertion and cried about ivory tower elitists when asked how you had reached that conclusion because you can't be bothered to actually support your arguments; then, you shifted the goalposts from "a lot" of people on GA are lazy to "omg u dont believe anyone on GA is lazy typical cantrell just typical"

you must have been something to behold in science class

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

“Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'”

Yes, but we forgive you for your ignorance. There's a wealth of knowledge out there that cannot be found in any text. And if it is, its a cut, dried, simplified version of a much more complex issue.

But continue on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

even though the very foundation of your wealth of knowledge is ultimately based upon a myriad of anecdotes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah that's basically all there is to data collection because as all scientists know, selection bias isn't real and small samples (such as, for example, your own dumb experiences) are perfectly representative of entire populations

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

a youtube video by psc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjQm9aJMo1U&sns=em

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah that's basically all there is to data collection because as all scientists know, selection bias isn't real and small samples (such as, for example, your own dumb experiences) are perfectly representative of entire populations

because knowledge is static right

i'm starting to think you're afraid of visceral learning experiences

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

nah i'm just unwilling to accept unsubstantiated claims such as "a lot of people on welfare are lazy" without:

1) defining "a lot"

2) defining "lazy"

3) any semblance of evidence beyond your dumb anecdotes

it's amazing how you "lol libruhl arts heh" types are so afraid of the scientific method when its results directly contradict your dumb ideology

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With rivera thinking defense would win mentality..they thought Cam would be enough him and Smitty and double trouble...didn't work that way..this is a passing league and you have to adjust..front 7 is nice but if the team is getting ball out quick it negates it.Our offense in the SB was slow and line not good on the right side..After loosing Smity we had no true threat...Benjamin is good but is slow. Ginn and Brown weak and small..they are no smity ..If Steve were here we would have had a 2015 SB. Imagine Smitty in Browns place during SB...the organization took a turn for worst on offense should have gotten a  replacement benji was not it or was not enough.
    • So you answer a question with a question? Have no opinion?  Scared to guess?
    • correct. herbert spencer's concept (falsely attributed to darwin) was used heavily throughout the late 19th century to add a scientific justification for things like child labor and opposing evils such as regulations. some people were meant to be poor! it is a sure sign someone has no empathy and shouldn't be a viable voice in putting together a society that works for everyone because it is inherently anti-social.