Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Eagles releasing Asomugha today.


  • Please log in to reply
45 replies to this topic

#1 Pantherman

Pantherman

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 10-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,162
  • Reputation: 278
HUDDLER

Posted 06 March 2013 - 10:57 AM

I don't know if it would happen. Be he would be good pick up for the Panthers at Vet mini. and could be a good replacement for Gamble. He ain't as good as he use to be and is in his 30s now. But I think he would be a good CB for us with a one year deal. http://profootballta...asomugha-today/

#2 Brokenbad

Brokenbad

    Cam is my hero

  • Joined: 07-April 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,550
  • Reputation: 66
HUDDLER

Posted 06 March 2013 - 11:01 AM

Crazy how he went from one of the most prized free agents last year to being released this year.

In fairness, he was not used to his strengths at ALL.

#3 Growl

Growl

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 21-March 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,697
  • Reputation: 4,099
HUDDLER

Posted 06 March 2013 - 11:02 AM

Vet minimum?



Lol

#4 R0CKnR0LLA

R0CKnR0LLA

    Drunk Posting

  • Joined: 03-April 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 9,893
  • Reputation: 3,691
  • LocationLas Vegas, NV
HUDDLER

Posted 06 March 2013 - 11:03 AM

if he signs for vet minimum it won't be here

#5 Darth Biscuit

Darth Biscuit

    Dark Lord

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 34,434
  • Reputation: 8,354
  • LocationWilmington, NC
HUDDLER

Posted 06 March 2013 - 11:05 AM

That is crazy. Wonder if the 49ers will make a play. I assume a lot of teams will.

#6 Pantherman

Pantherman

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 10-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,162
  • Reputation: 278
HUDDLER

Posted 06 March 2013 - 11:05 AM

if he signs for vet minimum it won't be here

And why not? Is there something wrong us. :devil:

#7 Pantherman

Pantherman

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 10-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,162
  • Reputation: 278
HUDDLER

Posted 06 March 2013 - 11:08 AM

That is crazy. Wonder if the 49ers will make a play. I assume a lot of teams will.

Remember the 49ers are after Revis right now. Could you imagian how unstoppable the 49ers would be on D if they got Revis and signed Asomugha. The NFC would be doomed. LOL

#8 Proudiddy

Proudiddy

    The Thread Killer (Since 2004)

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 17,068
  • Reputation: 5,240
Moderators

Posted 06 March 2013 - 11:09 AM

Failcons won't be trading for Revis now.

#9 iamhubby1

iamhubby1

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 13-June 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,675
  • Reputation: 1,122
  • LocationSpartanburg, SC
HUDDLER

Posted 06 March 2013 - 11:16 AM

And why not? Is there something wrong us. :devil:


I don't understand this sentiment either. Do we have cooties or something? If we can offer comparable compensation, why not us? He has already gotten his money, it may come down to where he wants to play. Just maybe, it could be us.

We are an up and coming team. With a Franchise QB and a decent D. He could come here and be successful. That is probably all he wants at this stage of his career. To be happy to come to work, and be successful. We may be able to offer him that.

Aw hell, who am I trying to kid. Most huddlers can't see the forest from the trees. They are still to upset over last year to view our position with any clarity.

#10 Darth Biscuit

Darth Biscuit

    Dark Lord

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 34,434
  • Reputation: 8,354
  • LocationWilmington, NC
HUDDLER

Posted 06 March 2013 - 11:18 AM

Remember the 49ers are after Revis right now. Could you imagian how unstoppable the 49ers would be on D if they got Revis and signed Asomugha. The NFC would be doomed. LOL


I can't imagine that they could afford both... could anyone?

I mean if they did, that's a minimum of 2 or 3 superbowls for them I think.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users