Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Sen. Rand Paul is Giving a Genuine Filibuster


  • Please log in to reply
85 replies to this topic

#21 Davidson Deac II

Davidson Deac II

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 17,930
  • Reputation: 1,460
HUDDLER

Posted 06 March 2013 - 08:07 PM

Then we disagree. American soil is the big difference. I mentioned the foreign thing in a later post


I am assuming we will arrest them if they are in the US. Or for that matter, any nation in Europe, and several other regions. There may be some extreme circumstances in which we might use drones on US soil, but then that is really not a change from the way we have done things in the past. A drone is just another military weapon, and we have used military weapons against US citizens in extreme circumstances throughout our history.

But in remote regions of Africa, the Arabian peninsula, etc..., I don't have a problem with it. If an arrest warrant makes people feel better, then tape it to the nose of the Hellfire missile.

#22 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 24,415
  • Reputation: 2,347
SUPPORTER

Posted 06 March 2013 - 09:13 PM

There you go - you just said there could be extreme circumstances where it would be prudent to use this method. You also mentioned we have done these actions (no drones though) in the past so it's not like some scary new way to grab power is being developed. Thats all I said as well.

#23 AR-15 Panther

AR-15 Panther

    Cough "Here" Cough

  • Joined: 26-July 11
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 320
  • Reputation: 42
HUDDLER

Posted 06 March 2013 - 09:29 PM

F*ck due process... Hellfires are easier...

This is about using drones to kill Americans on US soil without a trial, not bum f*cking Africa.

Where are all these d*mn terrorists we are supposed to be so fearful of to give up our liberties? Nothing has happened since 911, why now do we need this new measure?

What about posse comitatus or will they be giving the fbi predators?

Things that may make you a terrorist:
stains on your shirt
missing fingers
owning multiple firearms
having 7 days worth of food

Keep your heads low.

#24 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 24,415
  • Reputation: 2,347
SUPPORTER

Posted 06 March 2013 - 09:46 PM

The NSA and the DHS are not part of the military.

It would be political suicide to use a drone for anything like this unless you were sure beyond a reasonable doubt that the person being monitored was on their way to perform an attack and there was a chance conventional law enforcement would not be able to stop them. Again, chances are remote but there is a chance, so I think this was just CYA.

#25 stirs

stirs

    I Reckon So

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,073
  • Reputation: 1,997
HUDDLER

Posted 06 March 2013 - 09:54 PM

The NSA and the DHS are not part of the military.

It would be political suicide to use a drone for anything like this unless you were sure beyond a reasonable doubt that the person being monitored was on their way to perform an attack and there was a chance conventional law enforcement would not be able to stop them. Again, chances are remote but there is a chance, so I think this was just CYA.


I would bet all I own that if Bush or Romney were president, your answers would be the exact opposite. Enable on.

#26 GOOGLE RON PAUL

GOOGLE RON PAUL

    fleet-footed poster

  • Joined: 06-August 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,529
  • Reputation: 1,266
HUDDLER

Posted 06 March 2013 - 10:06 PM

i wonder how many people who are currently panicking over obummer's drone policy supported, and continue to support, the "war on terror"

#27 AR-15 Panther

AR-15 Panther

    Cough "Here" Cough

  • Joined: 26-July 11
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 320
  • Reputation: 42
HUDDLER

Posted 06 March 2013 - 10:11 PM

Rand is not talking about an immediate threat, but of an imminent threat.

What Obama wants is to use drone strikes on NON combative US citizens on US soil without a trial, this shouldn't even be up for debate...

Rand the man

#28 Kral

Kral

    Internet Legend

  • Joined: 28-February 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,942
  • Reputation: 274
HUDDLER

Posted 06 March 2013 - 10:15 PM

I would bet all I own that if Bush or Romney were president, your answers would be the exact opposite. Enable on.


I agree with you.

#29 GOOGLE RON PAUL

GOOGLE RON PAUL

    fleet-footed poster

  • Joined: 06-August 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,529
  • Reputation: 1,266
HUDDLER

Posted 06 March 2013 - 10:19 PM

Rand is not talking about an immediate threat, but of an imminent threat.

What Obama wants is to use drone strikes on NON combative US citizens on US soil without a trial, this shouldn't even be up for debate...

Rand the man


we've been killing noncombatants for years. it sucks when you could feasibly end up being the victim of an unwarranted drone strike, eh?

#30 Kral

Kral

    Internet Legend

  • Joined: 28-February 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,942
  • Reputation: 274
HUDDLER

Posted 06 March 2013 - 10:22 PM

we've been killing noncombatants for years. it sucks when you could feasibly end up being the victim of an unwarranted drone strike, eh?


No matter what this is an unacceptable method of operation due to it's abusive potential.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users