Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Wes Welker


  • Please log in to reply
83 replies to this topic

#11 The Huddler

The Huddler

    #BringHardyBack

  • Joined: 17-June 11
  • posts: 6,086
  • Reputation: 3,940
  • Location@TheHuddler2
SUPPORTER

Posted 06 March 2013 - 04:54 PM

It doesn't have anything to do with needs for me, it has to do with his age, contract and the fact that we have a damn near clone already on the roster in Steve Smith. If we're going to invest in a WR I'd far rather get a young, proven guy like Wallace, or a promising young guy in the draft with a rookie contract.

look man if hes gunna test the market, and if everyone has comes to the consensus that hes cheap, then why the hell not? The more talent the better. He doesnt have to be the answer to our reciever problem, bbut he could be part of it.
Im not even advocating the guy, its just funny how some people regardless of position will just say a stright no to a guy. Lol we suck. We need help. Beggers cant be choosers folks. And explainations as to why not to attain a player is better then "no".
But i agree with you man. Hes not the answer

#12 rscott94

rscott94

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 01-January 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,056
  • Reputation: 628
HUDDLER

Posted 06 March 2013 - 04:55 PM

Posted Image

#13 Jackofalltrades

Jackofalltrades

    OWN the Line of Scrimmage

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • posts: 18,654
  • Reputation: 6,637
  • LocationNC
SUPPORTER

Posted 06 March 2013 - 05:00 PM

look man if hes gunna test the market, and if everyone has comes to the consensus that hes cheap, then why the hell not? The more talent the better. He doesnt have to be the answer to our reciever problem, bbut he could be part of it.
Im not even advocating the guy, its just funny how some people regardless of position will just say a stright no to a guy. Lol we suck. We need help. Beggers cant be choosers folks. And explainations as to why not to attain a player is better then "no".
But i agree with you man. Hes not the answer


You have to be choosy when you have as little cap space as we do, we're also looking to the future and that's not what Welker gives you.

He's one of my favorite players in the league, I just don't think he's a good fit here, now.

#14 h0llywood

h0llywood

    I HATE LUKE KUECHLY!

  • Joined: 04-September 12
  • posts: 2,957
  • Reputation: 1,643
  • LocationPasadena, CA
SUPPORTER

Posted 06 March 2013 - 05:01 PM

look man if hes gunna test the market, and if everyone has comes to the consensus that hes cheap, then why the hell not? The more talent the better. He doesnt have to be the answer to our reciever problem, bbut he could be part of it.
Im not even advocating the guy, its just funny how some people regardless of position will just say a stright no to a guy. Lol we suck. We need help. Beggers cant be choosers folks. And explainations as to why not to attain a player is better then "no".
But i agree with you man. Hes not the answer


The problem is Wes Welker will not go cheap. That is the reason why he is testing the FA market in the first place.

#15 The Huddler

The Huddler

    #BringHardyBack

  • Joined: 17-June 11
  • posts: 6,086
  • Reputation: 3,940
  • Location@TheHuddler2
SUPPORTER

Posted 06 March 2013 - 05:04 PM

You have to be choosy when you have as little cap space as we do, we're also looking to the future and that's not what Welker gives you.

He's one of my favorite players in the league, I just don't think he's a good fit here, now.

I didnt think about that cap man. Thats acually a good point. Its not all about the talent its about the $ as well. Would much rather spend the little $ we have on a cb or something. If we took the money out of it i wouldnt see the harm of having welker here.

#16 CatfanMO

CatfanMO

    HUDDLER

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,577
  • Reputation: 365
  • LocationKC Mo
HUDDLER

Posted 06 March 2013 - 05:12 PM

I didnt think about that cap man. Thats acually a good point. Its not all about the talent its about the $ as well. Would much rather spend the little $ we have on a cb or something. If we took the money out of it i wouldnt see the harm of having welker here.


You didnt think about the cap? NO.......

#17 PhillyB

PhillyB

    sườn núi phía đông thứ ba của mặt trời

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 22,945
  • Reputation: 18,375
  • Locationthird spur east of the sun
HUDDLER

Posted 06 March 2013 - 05:13 PM

we already have the archetype in that department.

get cam a tall red zone threat. we don't need more than one midget on the team.

#18 Jackofalltrades

Jackofalltrades

    OWN the Line of Scrimmage

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • posts: 18,654
  • Reputation: 6,637
  • LocationNC
SUPPORTER

Posted 06 March 2013 - 05:26 PM

we already have the archetype in that department.

get cam a tall red zone threat. we don't need more than one midget on the team.


We already have 2, Smith and Adams...

#19 OneBadCat

OneBadCat

    HUDDLER

  • Joined: 19-February 13
  • posts: 1,684
  • Reputation: 765
SUPPORTER

Posted 06 March 2013 - 05:31 PM

Not to derail the thread but do you guys think Joe Adams makes an impact at WR this year?

#20 Jackofalltrades

Jackofalltrades

    OWN the Line of Scrimmage

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • posts: 18,654
  • Reputation: 6,637
  • LocationNC
SUPPORTER

Posted 06 March 2013 - 06:44 PM

Not to derail the thread but do you guys think Joe Adams makes an impact at WR this year?


I don't.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users