Gamble
#151
Posted 08 March 2013 - 09:44 PM
#152
Posted 08 March 2013 - 10:31 PM
About Three-Fiddy
Tree Fiddy - now you can sign the Loch Ness monster.
As for Gamble, I wouldn't mind San Diego kicking the tires on him, since Jammer/Cason look to be gone
#153
Posted 08 March 2013 - 11:36 PM
As for Gamble, I wouldn't mind San Diego kicking the tires on him, since Jammer/Cason look to be gone
Rivera loves former Chargers. Maybe we'll wind up trading (not betting on it, though).
#154
Posted 08 March 2013 - 11:56 PM
Rivera loves former Chargers. Maybe we'll wind up trading (not betting on it, though).
Jammer's future is probably at safety. I wouldn't mind him coming back to SD and be in play for SS.
#155
Posted 08 March 2013 - 11:58 PM
I'm not the world's biggest Charles Godfrey fan.
#156
Posted 09 March 2013 - 12:01 AM
HEY BUT AT LEAST WE GOT OUR DOUBLE TROUBLE EEYYYYEAAAAA
#157
Posted 09 March 2013 - 12:02 AM
#158
Posted 09 March 2013 - 12:40 AM
He's going to get like a Carlos Rogers deal and go to a team that's like one piece away and get like 6 interceptions next year
HEY BUT AT LEAST WE GOT OUR DOUBLE TROUBLE EEYYYYEAAAAA
He aint going to have a Carlos Rogers career
#159
Posted 09 March 2013 - 12:51 AM
Sad to see Gamble was let go. I was holding out hope that Gamble was gonna be able to stay with a reduced contract. Oh well...
fake ass
#160
Posted 09 March 2013 - 01:01 AM
They aren't on good terms.
#161
Posted 09 March 2013 - 01:03 AM
He's going to get like a Carlos Rogers deal and go to a team that's like one piece away and get like 6 interceptions next year
HEY BUT AT LEAST WE GOT OUR DOUBLE TROUBLE EEYYYYEAAAAA
#162
Posted 09 March 2013 - 01:19 AM
He's going to get like a Carlos Rogers deal and go to a team that's like one piece away and get like 6 interceptions next year
HEY BUT AT LEAST WE GOT OUR DOUBLE TROUBLE EEYYYYEAAAAA
What's your point? We needed to get under the cap before March 12th, cutting DWill would not have done that for us because of dead money. If he (or Beason for that matter) is cut, it'll be a June 1st cut. And no, they couldn't have just cut him earlier and designated him a June 1st cut, since he will still technically be on the books before June. I really don't see how we could've kept Gamble, given the circumstances.
#163
Posted 09 March 2013 - 01:29 AM
#164
Posted 09 March 2013 - 01:36 AM
#165
Posted 09 March 2013 - 01:41 AM
because I knew when they extended both runningbacks that more valuable players were going to be wedged out
They didn't extend DWill did they? Or are you talking about last year? If you are, that's a different regime. I hope DWill leaves or gets a paycut, for the sake of the team.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





