Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

Gamble


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
195 replies to this topic

#97 Happy Panther

Happy Panther

    Now even funnier.

  • Joined: 16-March 09
  • posts: 18,507
  • Reputation: 3,471
SUPPORTER

Posted 08 March 2013 - 01:51 PM

Nope this couldn't be more wrong. I believe it was two years ago, Riveras first year, he ranked 2nd behind Revis in advanced statistics for a CB.


You must have a different definition of second.

Advanced stats for the last 4 years
2012 - 155
2011 - 59
2010 - 81
2009 - 48

http://wp.advancednf...s=CB&season=all


Revis was #1 in 2009 and 2011

#98 SauceBoss

SauceBoss

    IT IS WHAT IT IS

  • Joined: 20-September 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,294
  • Reputation: 356
HUDDLER

Posted 08 March 2013 - 01:52 PM

At his age, do you think someone picks him up? Because maybe we could resign him for a lot less?

#99 NJPanthers12

NJPanthers12

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 18-November 09
  • posts: 1,806
  • Reputation: 495
SUPPORTER

Posted 08 March 2013 - 01:53 PM

While you are correct( it was the 2011 season), go diddle yourself with a sharp stick.

All I read was that I was correct. THANKS FLOPPIN

#100 NJPanthers12

NJPanthers12

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 18-November 09
  • posts: 1,806
  • Reputation: 495
SUPPORTER

Posted 08 March 2013 - 01:54 PM

You must have a different definition of second.

Advanced stats for the last 4 years
2012 - 155
2011 - 59
2010 - 81
2009 - 48

http://wp.advancednf...s=CB&season=all


Revis was #1 in 2009 and 2011


It was 2011 he was second in the NFL for QB rating against. Guy had a great year.

#101 Happy Panther

Happy Panther

    Now even funnier.

  • Joined: 16-March 09
  • posts: 18,507
  • Reputation: 3,471
SUPPORTER

Posted 08 March 2013 - 02:02 PM

It was 2011 he was second in the NFL for QB rating against. Guy had a great year.


If they chose prowbowlers based on one stat and ignored everything else he may have made it it.

He had a decent year

#102 NJPanthers12

NJPanthers12

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 18-November 09
  • posts: 1,806
  • Reputation: 495
SUPPORTER

Posted 08 March 2013 - 02:13 PM

If they chose prowbowlers based on one stat and ignored everything else he may have made it it.

He had a decent year


Well I also watched him that year and he consistently played great on other teams number one receiver, but no you are right. Gamble sucked. Wasn't good since 08. Good riddance to that bum. He was soooo lucky that QBs were unable to complete passes to their WR leading to such a low QB rating. I don't understand how Gamble left them so open all the time and the QB and WR were never able to connect.

#103 SCPantherFan90

SCPantherFan90

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 20-September 09
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 239
  • Reputation: 24
HUDDLER

Posted 08 March 2013 - 02:14 PM

He had a decent year


Wrong. 2011 was one Gamble's best seasons. Much better than decent. Thats why as understandable as this cut is, it stinks because Chris really looked like he fit perfectly in our new defensive scheme.

#104 Floppin

Floppin

    Smooches

  • Joined: 10-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,959
  • Reputation: 3,472
HUDDLER

Posted 08 March 2013 - 02:16 PM

Wrong. 2011 was one Gamble's best seasons. Much better than decent. Thats why as understandable as this cut is, it stinks because Chris really looked like he fit perfectly in our new defensive scheme.

He was back to performing pretty pedestrian prior to his injury last year.

#105 nickzz

nickzz
  • Joined: 28-February 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,421
  • Reputation: 849
HUDDLER

Posted 08 March 2013 - 02:19 PM

At his age, do you think someone picks him up? Because maybe we could resign him for a lot less?


lol someone will DEFINITELY pick him up. he's a very talented corner and he's not even 30.

#106 Floppin

Floppin

    Smooches

  • Joined: 10-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,959
  • Reputation: 3,472
HUDDLER

Posted 08 March 2013 - 02:21 PM

lol someone will DEFINITELY pick him up. he's a very talented corner and he's not even 30.


For three more days.

#107 nickzz

nickzz
  • Joined: 28-February 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,421
  • Reputation: 849
HUDDLER

Posted 08 March 2013 - 02:22 PM

For three more days.


even so, 30 isn't poo. he has at least 2 good years in him.

#108 Happy Panther

Happy Panther

    Now even funnier.

  • Joined: 16-March 09
  • posts: 18,507
  • Reputation: 3,471
SUPPORTER

Posted 08 March 2013 - 02:25 PM

Well I also watched him that year and he consistently played great on other teams number one receiver, but no you are right. Gamble sucked. Wasn't good since 08. Good riddance to that bum. He was soooo lucky that QBs were unable to complete passes to their WR leading to such a low QB rating. I don't understand how Gamble left them so open all the time and the QB and WR were never able to connect.


You are bad at this and getting defensive.

Gamble is simply not that big of a loss. I think he is past his prime and can make a serviceable CB somewhere perhaps. NFL experience is worth something.

We haven't had a great backfield in a while.