Gamble
#121
Posted 08 March 2013 - 04:48 PM
#122
Posted 08 March 2013 - 04:53 PM
I actually think Dockery and Thomas played pretty damn well.
I agree. Our biggest problem is the nckel.
There are a lot of CBs in free agency. I think we sit back and grab one at the end of the week at a good deal to compete.
Thomas was a bit raw in college but a stud. Dallas drafted him because they needed immediate help--he was not ready, so they cut him. I think the fruit is ripe now. Same with Dockery--he was inconsistant in college. He needed to learn.
#123
Posted 08 March 2013 - 04:54 PM
#124
Posted 08 March 2013 - 04:54 PM
lol someone will DEFINITELY pick him up. he's a very talented corner and he's not even 30.
Strange, for some reason i thought he was 31. Yah def the top corner on the market. Maybe he ends up in Green Bay.
#125
Posted 08 March 2013 - 04:59 PM
2004-2009
And those stat years mirrored his 2011 season.
If those are stats of a overrated CB then nobody knows how to grade a cornerback.
#126
Posted 08 March 2013 - 05:06 PM
http://espn.go.com/n...53/chris-gamble
2004-2009
And those stat years mirrored his 2011 season.
If those are stats of a overrated CB then nobody knows how to grade a cornerback.
Those stats don't mean much for evaluating CB talent.
He was clearly a stud CB up until 2008 and not so much after that.
I predict he will be overpaid and under-perform.
#127
Posted 08 March 2013 - 05:23 PM
http://espn.go.com/n...53/chris-gamble
2004-2009
And those stat years mirrored his 2011 season.
If those are stats of a overrated CB then nobody knows how to grade a cornerback.
Well, he's gone now. And nothing is changing that.
#128
Posted 08 March 2013 - 05:26 PM
#129
Posted 08 March 2013 - 05:34 PM
Those stats don't mean much for evaluating CB talent.
He was clearly a stud CB up until 2008 and not so much after that.
I predict he will be overpaid and under-perform.
LMAO! If stats dont mean much what the hell else are we supposed to look at for players? Why the hell is there even a HOF? I predict you are terrible at predictions.
#130
Posted 08 March 2013 - 05:35 PM
I'm appreciative of Gamble's contributions, but this move made perfect sense.
Yes. Frankly, I dunno how anyone could be convinced that he would stay.
#131
Posted 08 March 2013 - 05:36 PM
#132
Posted 08 March 2013 - 05:38 PM
Well, he's gone now. And nothing is changing that.
Who said he cant come back?
#133
Posted 08 March 2013 - 05:45 PM
#134
Posted 08 March 2013 - 06:04 PM
LMAO! If stats dont mean much what the hell else are we supposed to look at for players? Why the hell is there even a HOF? I predict you are terrible at predictions.
As long as you are using the right stats it is useful.
The ones posted earlier don't mean much.
#135
Posted 08 March 2013 - 06:08 PM
Gamble was top 3 in completion % against in these last few years that he has 'underperformed.'
But what is missing from that equation is what an utter joke our secondary became.
So the fact it was so tempting to throw at comically weak teammates....helps Gamble's numbers. We pretty much have had him out there with a cast that should be backups throughout the entire secondary.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





