Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Tavon Austin


  • Please log in to reply
156 replies to this topic

#31 TANTRIC-NINJA

TANTRIC-NINJA

    The Yumbo of the Huddle

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,724
  • Reputation: 2,198
  • LocationColumbia, South Kacky
HUDDLER

Posted 14 March 2013 - 06:51 PM

idk about tavon ....hes no jackson. hes more of a percy harvin type of guy.

which aint bad but i really like deep threat guy who can do both..


u noticed harvin and the welker types never have many tds........do slots ever go over 10 tds.... top tight ends have more of an impact then that in the redzone....


Welker does not score more than 6-7 tds..neither doew Steve Smith..but it has to be game planned for. There is a reason why Gronk had so many open looks...hi -lo options with a giant helps but you cannot forget that welker is always commanding eyes sometimes 2sets.

If you did not understand why Harvin was considered for MVp toward the end of the season you just dont watch him. He does a lot to get to the 5 yrd line where AP is getting in all respect.

#32 BigSyke

BigSyke

    I Know you Watching me but I'm watching you too Playa...

  • Joined: 07-November 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,192
  • Reputation: 113
  • LocationFLORIDA
HUDDLER

Posted 14 March 2013 - 07:29 PM

Welker does not score more than 6-7 tds..neither doew Steve Smith..but it has to be game planned for. There is a reason why Gronk had so many open looks...hi -lo options with a giant helps but you cannot forget that welker is always commanding eyes sometimes 2sets.

If you did not understand why Harvin was considered for MVp toward the end of the season you just dont watch him. He does a lot to get to the 5 yrd line where AP is getting in all respect.


i understand..........but on avg slots aint scoring that many tds(10+). on avg deep threats are.

yeah i can give you a few deep threats that didnt score alot like smith but i cant give you ANY slots that score more than 10 tds.

#33 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    HORNETS 2014

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,678
  • Reputation: 2,761
  • LocationKurby
HUDDLER

Posted 14 March 2013 - 11:18 PM

Kind of want him at 14 now

#34 rcaddell23

rcaddell23

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 10-August 11
  • posts: 28
  • Reputation: 8
ROOKIE

Posted 15 March 2013 - 08:49 AM

Joe Person@josephperson
Floated TA name to CAR staffer recently. Questioned long-term durability.RT @James_Dator: Kiper mocks WE to #Panthers http://sbn.to/16oPUf9


Nobody listens to Mel.


He never missed a practice during his four years at WVA.... so...

#35 CPF4LIFE

CPF4LIFE

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 10-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,642
  • Reputation: 1,450
HUDDLER

Posted 15 March 2013 - 09:18 AM

If they are questioning his long term durability then it doesnt sound like someone you take 14 overall, you always draft someone at the top of the draft with the hope of them being reliable for the long haul.

#36 Falcons1stPanthers2nd

Falcons1stPanthers2nd

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,065
  • Reputation: 197
HUDDLER

Posted 15 March 2013 - 09:21 AM

If they are questioning his long term durability then it doesnt sound like someone you take 14 overall, you always draft someone at the top of the draft with the hope of them being reliable for the long haul.

They said that cause he's small. Not cause he actually has durability concerns.

#37 CPF4LIFE

CPF4LIFE

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 10-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,642
  • Reputation: 1,450
HUDDLER

Posted 15 March 2013 - 09:25 AM

They said that cause he's small. Not cause he actually has durability concerns.


I know that, it means both. Still, its something you have to consider. He may not be able to hold up in the NFL compared to college.

#38 RockyTopVol

RockyTopVol

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 27-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,698
  • Reputation: 157
HUDDLER

Posted 15 March 2013 - 02:28 PM

He kind of reminds me of Michael Crabtree...just way shorter.

#39 Falcons1stPanthers2nd

Falcons1stPanthers2nd

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,065
  • Reputation: 197
HUDDLER

Posted 16 March 2013 - 05:55 AM

I know that, it means both. Still, its something you have to consider. He may not be able to hold up in the NFL compared to college.

True. I just really like him

#40 jarhead

jarhead

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,632
  • Reputation: 995
  • Locationnear Charlotte
HUDDLER

Posted 16 March 2013 - 06:02 AM

1. We barley used the weapons we have already.

It took a whole season to use Tolbert.

We never used Barniage or Adams like we could have.

You are just adding another gimmick to a team who has to many gimmicks already. We were better when we ran a traditional offense and ran the ball down hill.

2. I can see adding a bigger target for the red zone and the fact that when Cam misses a pass he misses High. Which would be perfect for a Bigger WR.

3. I could see him in the Pats offense taking Welker's role but hear we need a actually WR who can become a #1 outside WR. Austin is a slot WR. You don't spend a top 15 pick on a slot WR unless.

Your one player from a superbowl and a slot wr is that position or you are changing the offense to feature a slot WR or you run a west coast or Patriot type offense. We are not in any of these situation..



That is a sad reason not to take him (we do not use the weapons we have).You cannot ignore his accomplishments and film compared to patterson. He is more than just a slot receiver and has the ability to move outside.He is a Sproil and harvin in one package


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users