no. i think this if anything it's a sign that they either did or are near getting something done with beason. we can still cut beason and replace him with a true SAM for a lot cheaper and still be in better shape with the cap.
Doesn't this give Beason leverage in not taking a pay cut?
Shouldn't we have done that first?
Either way, I don't have a problem with the move. What's it net us financially?
beason still has very little leverage here.
as far as the benefit to replacing him...depends on if a june 1 cut or not.