Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

What have we really lost?

51 posts in this topic

Posted

I understand that man. First round DT's have a HIGH bust rate and that scares me. Plus it seems like it usually takes them a couple years to develop and have any impact(Outside Suh). I 'm not saying we shouldn't take one but getting Cam and Kuechly the last 2 years and watching them dominate immediately has me spoiled. I just remember how high everyone was on last years DT class(I wanted Fletcher Cox) and I don't remember any of them doing much to stand out last year. Whoever we take I don't want a project at 1.

Fortunatley for us, he would not have to start. So we could bring him along, rather than throwing him straight into the fire.

Not sure I buy the bust rate for high DT picks. Sure there are very few that make a difference their rookie years. But usually, when you get those guys, they wind up being pretty good.

I just want the best athlete left when we pick. DT? Fine by me. WR or DB? Fine with me. As long as they are athletic, they make us better. And that is fine with me as well.

I am a tad worried about the Oline. So if we actually took one in the first I probably could talk myself into being fine with that one too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Biggest loss is that we were a 7-9 team and haven't improved while others have. There's still time for that. We just need a few lucky bounces in the draft and we'll be fine.

This. Especially in the division...I mean it's clear that Atlanta is in it to win it right now and the Taints are in position to improve. And then you look around the NFC at teams like San Fran, Seattle, Philly, and Detroit...they're all getting stronger as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Fortunatley for us, he would not have to start. So we could bring him along, rather than throwing him straight into the fire.

Not sure I buy the bust rate for high DT picks. Sure there are very few that make a difference their rookie years. But usually, when you get those guys, they wind up being pretty good.

I just want the best athlete left when we pick. DT? Fine by me. WR or DB? Fine with me. As long as they are athletic, they make us better. And that is fine with me as well.

I am a tad worried about the Oline. So if we actually took one in the first I probably could talk myself into being fine with that one too.

I see your point. But IMO you need to see something early out of a 1st rd pick. Statistically if you go back and look at the last 10-15 yrs worth of 1st rd DT's they are the highest percentage of busts. With the Glenn Dorsey, Tyson Jackson's of the world. Of course that is a risk with any player but history just shows 1st rd DT are risky.

Like you I just want the BPA whether that's Dline, Oline, whatever. I want a WR but it looks like best value is 2nd rd unless we trade back . I think Rivera can do more with less on the defense than Shula can with the offense. That's why I tend to want oline, then WR. But of course couldn't be mad about a legit #1 corner, or monster DT. A probowl talent/star at any of several positions would make us better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

we lost a awful playcaller which made us lose much possible success, also 2 less than average dbs. looking at it this way i may add we should look to slice away some replaceable vets on offense as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I see your point. But IMO you need to see something early out of a 1st rd pick. Statistically if you go back and look at the last 10-15 yrs worth of 1st rd DT's they are the highest percentage of busts. With the Glenn Dorsey, Tyson Jackson's of the world. Of course that is a risk with any player but history just shows 1st rd DT are risky.

Like you I just want the BPA whether that's Dline, Oline, whatever. I want a WR but it looks like best value is 2nd rd unless we trade back . I think Rivera can do more with less on the defense than Shula can with the offense. That's why I tend to want oline, then WR. But of course couldn't be mad about a legit #1 corner, or monster DT. A probowl talent/star at any of several positions would make us better.

Can't argue with any of that. With our needs we just have to add some athletes. Even in the later rounds we have to find some athletes.

I would feel better if Gettlemen was a College evaluator. Cuz that is the another area he is needing help to make his decisions. We drafted well last year, so I have some faith in the staff. But I just wish Gettlemen was a little bit more familiar with the draft.

Anyway you look at it. We are still young and learning. I would love to add some Vets to go along with the rookies. I want to be excited. Just doesn't seem to be happening as easily as I would like.

Still a bright future ahead though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Can't argue with any of that. With our needs we just have to add some athletes. Even in the later rounds we have to find some athletes.

I would feel better if Gettlemen was a College evaluator. Cuz that is the another area he is needing help to make his decisions. We drafted well last year, so I have some faith in the staff. But I just wish Gettlemen was a little bit more familiar with the draft.

Anyway you look at it. We are still young and learning. I would love to add some Vets to go along with the rookies. I want to be excited. Just doesn't seem to be happening as easily as I would like.

Still a bright future ahead though.

With all due respect, what is your obsession with "athletes"? This is your third post on just this page clamoring for the top "athletes" in the draft. We all know athleticism doesn't automatically translate into good football. That's why the combine doesn't really alter draft position by a whole lot...or else these "Combine Warriors" like Margus Hunt would go in the top 5. Instead, last I heard he's a projected 2nd rounder.

Just trying to figure out your thought process.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I really only hoped for a Gross restructure and a re-signing of Dwan ...neither of those has happened but Person said he expects a Gross restructure to come

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

With all due respect, what is your obsession with "athletes"? This is your third post on just this page clamoring for the top "athletes" in the draft. We all know athleticism doesn't automatically translate into good football. That's why the combine doesn't really alter draft position by a whole lot...or else these "Combine Warriors" like Margus Hunt would go in the top 5. Instead, last I heard he's a projected 2nd rounder.

Just trying to figure out your thought process.

When you are talking about the top 14 in the draft, you are talking about the top talent in the class. Some of those guys have more athletic ability than others. If you are talking comparable talent. I would take the better athlete.

Athletes bring flexibilty, playmaking ability, and that all important "Wow" factor.

Now if you are talking equal talent and athletic ability. Give me the harder worker. But in almost every case imaginable. You take the best athlete left on the board. I promise if you do this, your need for FA will diminish every year until you barely need them at all.

It also keeps your team stocked. Allowing you to focus on those athletes worth a bigger deal. Depth is what gives you that flexibilty. So if you are stacked with athletes, you should be in good shape cap wise as well, as talent wise.

IMHO, the team with the most athletes usually wins. If I have 20 athletes against your 15, who would you expect to win?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

The best players we lost was D. Edwards and C. Gamble. Edwards was using the "Teams have offered me longer deals" offers but hasn't signed. Which gives me the idea he is FOS. Just a smoke screen to get us to offer him a bigger contract. While I believe we should give him a two year deal it appears Gettlemen wants to keep his commitment to older players down.

I am surprised no one is barking up Gamble's tree. I realized he was injured but he is a quality CB. I know many dislike him but look at his completion rate against him when he was healthy.

I would like to see us re-sign D. Edwards, Bring in a skilled WR and a good offensive guard thru Free Agency.

There are quality DBs and DTs in the Draft.

What i would like to see is us Jettison, Clausen, and A. Edwards. Sad to say but Clausen and A.Edwards is a bust.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

The best players we lost was D. Edwards and C. Gamble. Edwards was using the "Teams have offered me longer deals" offers but hasn't signed. Which gives me the idea he is FOS. Just a smoke screen to get us to offer him a bigger contract. While I believe we should give him a two year deal it appears Gettlemen wants to keep his commitment to older players down.

I am surprised no one is barking up Gamble's tree. I realized he was injured but he is a quality CB. I know many dislike him but look at his completion rate against him when he was healthy.

I would like to see us re-sign D. Edwards, Bring in a skilled WR and a good offensive guard thru Free Agency.

There are quality DBs and DTs in the Draft.

What i would like to see is us Jettison, Clausen, and A. Edwards. Sad to say but Clausen and A.Edwards is a bust.

Gamble retired right after we cut him. He doesn't want to play anymore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Gamble retired right after we cut him. He doesn't want to play anymore.

I thought I heard that. Thought it was Gamble blowing smoke.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I'Would be interested to know if there is something other than money keeping these guys away? We can't be too far off of market value that we can't get something done? Are they insulted by our offer? I mean, what is the deal guys?

Sure we cant afford those crazy contracts, but the problem is not really the money but also the fact that we can only offer 1 year deals I think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites