Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

Okay, someone will be a June 1st cut


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
30 replies to this topic

#25 R0CKnR0LLA

R0CKnR0LLA

    Drunk Posting

  • Joined: 03-April 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 10,178
  • Reputation: 4,158
HUDDLER

Posted 19 March 2013 - 10:30 PM

Where is the documentation or link that says that trading a player after June 1st is the same as cutting him.
I looked on several sites and none of them referenced this. I sent an email to "ask the commish" with this question. I did see a jets blog saying they are the same in reference to cutting or trading Revis but nowhere else.
This links suggests that June 1st cuts are different than trades, not the same.
http://insidefootbal...g/archives/3990

Can you clarify??


It's all in the CBA. Feel free to download and read a PDF of it.

#26 x djdrew x

x djdrew x

    Member

  • Joined: 29-July 11
  • posts: 299
  • Reputation: 84
SUPPORTER

Posted 19 March 2013 - 11:17 PM

Could be wrong but im pretty sure that there is automatic salary set aside every year for rookies per new cba.....

#27 TNPanther

TNPanther

    Jimmie Rustler

  • Joined: 26-October 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,238
  • Reputation: 1,225
HUDDLER

Posted 19 March 2013 - 11:32 PM

I'm going to go out on a limb and say DeAngelo. It was obvious last year that he is not an ideal fit for Rivera's philosophy, and such a cut would make the most sense. We simply cannot afford to cut Gross.

#28 DaveThePanther2008

DaveThePanther2008

    Gonna live and die as a faithful Panther Fan

  • Joined: 09-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,772
  • Reputation: 966
HUDDLER

Posted 20 March 2013 - 07:15 AM

We already have a June 1st cut in James Anderson.


I may be wrong but I thought we were allowed 2 June 1st cuts in advance.

#29 Kurb

Kurb

    I hit it.

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 13,854
  • Reputation: 4,612
Administrators

Posted 20 March 2013 - 07:36 AM

It's the same thing, cutting or trading a player. If cut/traded before June 1 the dead money accelerates to this season, if after it applies to next year.

Cutting a player you have the option to designate them a June 1 cut even if you cut them before that date. Trading them there's not that option so if we trade DWill it would actually have to be after June 1st.

This means that in the unlikely event that we find a trade partner we wouldn't gain any draft picks this year but instead they'd be dealing us future picks (which actually makes it more likely that a team will give us something for him).



In a perfect world then Don Gettleman is shopping him for "anything" and come June 2 he is cut or traded. We deal with the cap hit and end up back in the green that much faster.

#30 Kurb

Kurb

    I hit it.

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 13,854
  • Reputation: 4,612
Administrators

Posted 20 March 2013 - 07:37 AM

Why do you guys want to move money to next year. We need to have space next year to go ahead and lock Cam up long term. Why do we want to eat into that cap more then already necessary????



Might be forced to to fill problem area's and sign draft picks.

#31 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 27,262
  • Reputation: 5,361
Moderators

Posted 20 March 2013 - 10:16 AM

If DeAngelo Williams is on this roster week 1 AND accounts for the current cap space he does....Gettlemen should be fired. Pay cut, trade, or cut....doesn't matter but it has to be something. But now is not the time for him to talk Williams...he had to say he doesn't a reason why he can't keep him otherwise he loses the little trade position he has.