Jump to content


Photo
* - - - - 1 votes

Still prochoice for late-term abortions?


  • Please log in to reply
73 replies to this topic

#1 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,138 posts

Posted 20 March 2013 - 09:10 PM

http://www.dailynews...orker-describes

Dr. Kermit Gosnell, 72, faces the death penalty if convicted of killing seven late-term babies after they were born alive. He is also charged with third-degree murder in the overdose death of a 41-year-old refugee who sought an abortion in 2009.
Medical assistant Adrienne Moton admitted Tuesday that she had cut the necks of at least 10 babies after they were delivered, as Gosnell had instructed her. Gosnell and another employee regularly "snipped" the spines "to ensure fetal demise," she said.
Moton sobbed as she recalled taking a cellphone photograph of one baby because he was bigger than any she had seen aborted before. She measured the fetus at nearly 30 weeks, and thought he could have survived, given his size and pinkish color. Gosnell later joked that the baby was so big he could have walked to the bus stop, she said.


Posted Image

Wonder what would piss off everyone. Flipping off dead fetuses?

Article contains more.

#2 thatlookseasy

thatlookseasy

    Death to pennies

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,935 posts

Posted 21 March 2013 - 08:39 AM

If only we could make this illegal, then it would stop.

Whats that? This IS illegal? fug it, lets just make all abortions illegal. Thats the argument you use with guns, right?

#3 Panthro

Panthro

    Bunned

  • Moderators
  • 23,217 posts

Posted 21 March 2013 - 08:43 AM

yeah that is already illegal

and I am prolife

Are you against capital punishment g5 too?

#4 Happy Panther

Happy Panther

    Now even funnier.

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,558 posts

Posted 21 March 2013 - 08:45 AM

Dr. Kermit

lol

#5 Darth Biscuit

Darth Biscuit

    Dark Lord

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 32,566 posts
  • LocationWilmington, NC

Posted 21 March 2013 - 08:49 AM

yeah that is already illegal

and I am prolife

Are you against capital punishment g5 too?


My stances have changed a good bit on abortion. I am def pro life and think it should be kept to a minimum, but it should be legal for early term abortions. I don't think the gov't should subsidize it in any way however.

As far as the death penalty thing goes, I draw the line with choice. An adult that chooses to commit a crime, esp a heinous one is far, far different imo than an innocent unborn baby. I don't think I can equate the two in any way.

Having said that, the death penalty is severely misused and prejudicial in our current system and it's use should be completely revamped... ie it should only be used in cases where there is a heinous crime with overwhelming evidence of guilt, iow it should not have the same standard as regular criminal cases.

#6 Cat

Cat

    Terminally bored

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,059 posts

Posted 21 March 2013 - 09:29 AM

Flawless logic once again from G5.

And I'm against late term abortions.

#7 Gazi

Gazi

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,798 posts

Posted 21 March 2013 - 09:57 AM

Let's make it more illegal!!! illegal is just not enough. err.. derp

#8 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,138 posts

Posted 21 March 2013 - 10:01 AM

Not federally illegal.

#9 Niner National

Niner National

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,359 posts

Posted 21 March 2013 - 10:22 AM

Not federally illegal.

I thought you preferred states rights?

#10 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,138 posts

Posted 21 March 2013 - 10:46 AM

I do. But basic human rights are still protected by the constitution. Life...liberty..that sort of thing?

Unless you want that grey too....which you already have.

#11 SZ James

SZ James

    1 888 CAM PAIN

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,434 posts

Posted 21 March 2013 - 10:51 AM

states should only vote on people's rights when it comes to the gays

#12 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,138 posts

Posted 21 March 2013 - 10:54 AM

Tangent man...to the rescue!

#13 SZ James

SZ James

    1 888 CAM PAIN

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,434 posts

Posted 21 March 2013 - 11:04 AM

That post was just as relevant as the responses so far, but for some reason that was where you drew the line. Interesting.....

#14 Panthro

Panthro

    Bunned

  • Moderators
  • 23,217 posts

Posted 21 March 2013 - 12:12 PM

he's a hypocrite

#15 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,138 posts

Posted 21 March 2013 - 12:23 PM

So what part about gays do you feel is a federal issue.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com - IP Content Design by Joshua Tree / TitansReport.