Jump to content


Photo
* - - - - 1 votes

Still prochoice for late-term abortions?


  • Please log in to reply
73 replies to this topic

#11 SZ James (banned)

SZ James (banned)

  • Joined: 24-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,436
  • Reputation: 3,529
HUDDLER

Posted 21 March 2013 - 10:51 AM

states should only vote on people's rights when it comes to the gays

#12 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • Joined: 17-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,063
  • Reputation: 458
HUDDLER

Posted 21 March 2013 - 10:54 AM

Tangent man...to the rescue!

#13 SZ James (banned)

SZ James (banned)

  • Joined: 24-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,436
  • Reputation: 3,529
HUDDLER

Posted 21 March 2013 - 11:04 AM

That post was just as relevant as the responses so far, but for some reason that was where you drew the line. Interesting.....

#14 Panthro

Panthro

    aka Pablo

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 24,872
  • Reputation: 5,780
Moderators

Posted 21 March 2013 - 12:12 PM

he's a hypocrite

#15 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • Joined: 17-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,063
  • Reputation: 458
HUDDLER

Posted 21 March 2013 - 12:23 PM

So what part about gays do you feel is a federal issue.

#16 stirs

stirs

    I Reckon So

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,073
  • Reputation: 1,997
HUDDLER

Posted 21 March 2013 - 12:27 PM

So the outrage here in the Tbox is with G5?

How can you not be outraged at the barbarian who called himself a doctor? Typical.

#17 thatlookseasy

thatlookseasy

    Death to pennies

  • Joined: 16-August 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,950
  • Reputation: 607
HUDDLER

Posted 21 March 2013 - 12:38 PM

So the outrage here in the Tbox is with G5?

How can you not be outraged at the barbarian who called himself a doctor? Typical.


Uhhhh, because its well understood that he is a terrible excuse for a human being. I dont feel the need to point out that I dont support every murderer out there. The guy was essentially a hit man

#18 thatlookseasy

thatlookseasy

    Death to pennies

  • Joined: 16-August 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,950
  • Reputation: 607
HUDDLER

Posted 21 March 2013 - 12:40 PM

My stances have changed a good bit on abortion. I am def pro life and think it should be kept to a minimum, but it should be legal for early term abortions. I don't think the gov't should subsidize it in any way however.


Why, exactly? I dont think the government has any place in legislating morality, and paying for an abortion saves a ton of money over supporting this kid whose parents may not be in a position to support him.

#19 Darth Biscuit

Darth Biscuit

    Dark Lord

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 34,434
  • Reputation: 8,354
  • LocationWilmington, NC
HUDDLER

Posted 21 March 2013 - 12:50 PM

Why, exactly? I dont think the government has any place in legislating morality, and paying for an abortion saves a ton of money over supporting this kid whose parents may not be in a position to support him.


A- because of what I bolded... they shouldn't legislate (early term) abortion either way. Don't outlaw it and don't fund it.

B- it should be a personal choice and since it is, that person should have to deal with the entirety of making that choice. Get pregnant and don't want to have the baby, you make the decision to get an abortion, you pay for it, and you deal with the consequences.


Whether you like it or not, the gov't does legislate morality. It is immoral to kill someone, so it's illegal. It's immoral to steal, so it's illegal. To some, aborting a 2 day old fetus is murder. To some others, aborting a fetus that's 8.9 months is perfectly fine... the gov't has the job to decided where that line is. If not the gov't then who?

#20 TANTRIC-NINJA

TANTRIC-NINJA

    The Yumbo of the Huddle

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,726
  • Reputation: 2,198
  • LocationColumbia, South Kacky
HUDDLER

Posted 21 March 2013 - 12:56 PM

I think most pro-choice advocates would agree that they are not Pro-Abortion, just Pro-Choice so that there is an option in certain instances..not birth Control or whatever extreme spin on can make against it.

And logically there is an understanding of developmental stages where it is too far...this clearly being it.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users