6 replies to this topic

[scpanther22]

Good move or not

The two teams would have diametrically opposed reasons for making the deal. The Cavs would be looking for a missing piece to the championship puzzle, while the Suns would simply be trying to shed O'Neal's $20 million salary

http://msn.foxsports...nterest-in-Shaq

[carpanfan96]

ummm, well if shaq plays the way he did this year and stays as healthy as he did. Then good trade and deal for the Cavs, if not bad trade.

Whats the odds of him at his age and his injury history though staying healthy for two seasons in a row?????

[Kevin Greene]

ummm, well if shaq plays the way he did this year and stays as healthy as he did. Then good trade and deal for the Cavs, if not bad trade.

Whats the odds of him at his age and his injury history though staying healthy for two seasons in a row?????

And the disinterest he has shown for staying in shape for years.
The Cavs can do better.

[Darth Biscuit]

I don't know if I like this or not... I can't decide. I want the Cavs to do something but I don't know about this.

[King Taharqa]

Its a risk worth taking. Even a washed up Shaq is better than any of their other big men right now. Especially if they can rid themselves of Ben Wallace & Sasha's contracts. Cavs still need a bigger 2 guard if they want a title. Having 2 6'2 guards in your backcourt is not gonna get it done.

[CarolinaPanthers8789]

It doesn't matter, ESPN said that the Suns had no interest in disposing of Shaq.

[TheAceBoog1e]

Shaq>Ben Wallace and Sasha Pavlovich.

Thats a no brainer