Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Pat Y is a tool.


  • Please log in to reply
63 replies to this topic

#16 Growl

Growl

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,227 posts

Posted 22 March 2013 - 01:50 PM

Does anyone really care what Yasinskas thinks, positive or negative, about us at this point?

He's held a grudge ever since we shipped all his old buddies inside the team off and started building a team around good players rather than the "good ole boys" he's so fond of.

#17 TheRed

TheRed

    California Dreamin'

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,450 posts
  • LocationCharlotte, NC

Posted 22 March 2013 - 01:50 PM

The whiners should save their tears for the draft.

#18 jtnc

jtnc

    Resident Asshole

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,553 posts

Posted 22 March 2013 - 01:52 PM

In fairness....all we have done is lose Chris Gamble and sign weak secondary players and a return man.

All in all, that makes us a little worse....

We still have a pass-rush, and still got a W without Gamble against them last year. Abraham is a much bigger impact for them, than Gamble was for us. They have no one across Asante(who's also suspect in coverage) and a offensive line that's inconsistent.

#19 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • ALL-PRO
  • 42,222 posts
  • LocationSC

Posted 22 March 2013 - 01:54 PM

He's probably thinking Brandon Beane would have done a better job.

#20 DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

    Senior Member

  • Moderators
  • 26,275 posts

Posted 22 March 2013 - 01:56 PM

We still have a pass-rush, and still got a W without Gamble against them last year. Abraham is a much bigger impact for them, than Gamble was for us. They have no one across Asante(who's also suspect in coverage) and a offensive line that's inconsistent.


Didn't say we didn't have a pass rush....

He isn't saying we suck...just looking at what we had and now have. We haven't improved yet....the guys we signed dont have the work put in for them to be viewed as much. Maybe one works out..but an unbiased person wouldn't look at what we have done and said we are now better.

It also isn't about how we did without Gamble...not from the perspective he is grading.

#21 SmashNDash

SmashNDash

    Junior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 593 posts

Posted 22 March 2013 - 01:59 PM

Screw Pat Y, SJax is run down and Ben Watson makes the Saints a winner? lol!

The only team that I think has done better then us is the Bucs, and they are giving up a lot.

#22 OneBadCat

OneBadCat

    HUDDLER

  • ALL-PRO
  • 1,579 posts

Posted 22 March 2013 - 02:03 PM

Why can't we have a writer that isn't a douche bag?

#23 DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

    Senior Member

  • Moderators
  • 26,275 posts

Posted 22 March 2013 - 02:03 PM

Screw Pat Y, SJax is run down and Ben Watson makes the Saints a winner? lol!

The only team that I think has done better then us is the Bucs, and they are giving up a lot.

Steven Jackson has run for 1000+yards for the last 8 consecutive years and is younger than Williams....

He is a GREAT pickup for a win now team. He has spent his career being the focus of defenses and steps onto a team where defenses have to worry about the 2 WRs.

to suggest we have done better than what that single move does for ATL in 2013 is Panther blindness

#24 hepcat

hepcat

    Skandalouz

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,825 posts

Posted 22 March 2013 - 02:15 PM

In fairness....all we have done is lose Chris Gamble and sign weak secondary players and a return man.

All in all, that makes us a little worse....


Gamble barely played last year so I don't see how losing him even matters.

#25 DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

    Senior Member

  • Moderators
  • 26,275 posts

Posted 22 March 2013 - 02:18 PM

Gamble barely played last year so I don't see how losing him even matters.


Bc that isn't what evaluating the teams is about during this period.

We are better with Gamble a healthy Gamble than without. Doesn't mean the impact is huge but our secondary to date....on paper and the work guys have put in got worse.


#26 rscott94

rscott94

    Junior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,014 posts

Posted 22 March 2013 - 02:26 PM

since the saints have not signed a tackle, do you think they may be trying to trade up for one of the 3 top tackles?

I doubt it.. From what I've heard they're looking at defense with the 15th pick

#27 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,847 posts
  • LocationNonya

Posted 22 March 2013 - 02:46 PM

All they need him for is 1 yr....they are in win now mode not building for the future mode.


Not with that defense as it stands now.

#28 DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

    Senior Member

  • Moderators
  • 26,275 posts

Posted 22 March 2013 - 02:47 PM

Not with that defense as it stands now.


Offense driven league...

Score enough, often enough....bad defensive players can make plays

#29 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,847 posts
  • LocationNonya

Posted 22 March 2013 - 02:50 PM

Offense driven league...

Score enough, often enough....bad defensive players can make plays


2 top defenses in the Superbowl not great offences.

#30 DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

    Senior Member

  • Moderators
  • 26,275 posts

Posted 22 March 2013 - 02:57 PM

2 top defenses in the Superbowl not great offences.


Exceptions to every thing....

Look at the 2 teams in the Superbowl the last 5 years. Majority of those 10 are going to be offense driven.

Also, the Ravens didn't have a great D last year. Average.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com