Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Cordarrelle Patterson vs. Tavon Austin


  • Please log in to reply
49 replies to this topic

#11 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    HORNETS 2014

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,678
  • Reputation: 2,761
  • LocationKurby
HUDDLER

Posted 24 March 2013 - 02:20 AM

People I see that can / could be a number 1 in this draft

Hopkins
Rodgers
Hunter
Williams
Allen
Patton
Patterson (solely on potential as he needs alot of work, to risky for me)

Id go with Hopkins as a sure thing. At the very least you are getting a dominant #2.

He has insane hands and route running, to go along with insane stats and a respectable WR body.


You're telling me that just bc Austin is a "slot", doesnt mean he can be a No.1?
So, Welker isnt a no.1? Percy isnt a no.1? Both of them are no.1 receiver. "GO TO GUY".

#12 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,847
  • Reputation: 474
  • LocationNonya
HUDDLER

Posted 24 March 2013 - 02:32 AM

People I see that can / could be a number 1 in this draft

Hopkins
Rodgers
Hunter
Williams
Allen
Patton
Patterson (solely on potential as he needs alot of work, to risky for me)

Id go with Hopkins as a sure thing. At the very least you are getting a dominant #2.

He has insane hands and route running, to go along with insane stats and a respectable WR body.


Hopkins, Hunter and Allen yes.

Rogers Patton are good #2

and Patterson is a ?.

#13 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,847
  • Reputation: 474
  • LocationNonya
HUDDLER

Posted 24 March 2013 - 02:34 AM

You're telling me that just bc Austin is a "slot", doesnt mean he can be a No.1?
So, Welker isnt a no.1? Percy isnt a no.1? Both of them are no.1 receiver. "GO TO GUY".


Can Welker Line up in any other position besides the slot?

I would also like to see how Welker looks when he isn't in that Patriot offense.

#14 Dash Global

Dash Global

    Member

  • Joined: 12-November 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,050
  • Reputation: 139
HUDDLER

Posted 24 March 2013 - 02:35 AM

You're telling me that just bc Austin is a "slot", doesnt mean he can be a No.1?
So, Welker isnt a no.1? Percy isnt a no.1? Both of them are no.1 receiver. "GO TO GUY".


When I say number1 it is in reference to the outside WR. ie the 1&2 are generally on the outside with the 3 being the slot

Austin like Welker can def be "go to guys". Just like a TE. Just not number1 receivers in my definition.

#15 Dash Global

Dash Global

    Member

  • Joined: 12-November 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,050
  • Reputation: 139
HUDDLER

Posted 24 March 2013 - 02:35 AM

dbl post

#16 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    HORNETS 2014

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,678
  • Reputation: 2,761
  • LocationKurby
HUDDLER

Posted 24 March 2013 - 02:42 AM

Can Welker Line up in any other position besides the slot?

I would also like to see how Welker looks when he isn't in that Patriot offense.


You dont have to be able to line up every where to be a no.1. The definition of a No.1 receiver is someone who can constantly make plays and be a "go to guy", which Welker is.

I guess, get ready to see Welker in a Broncos' offense with Peyton if you wanna see him in another offense beside NE. Yea, he's definitely not going to have the same impact (sarcasm). :)

#17 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    HORNETS 2014

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,678
  • Reputation: 2,761
  • LocationKurby
HUDDLER

Posted 24 March 2013 - 02:44 AM

When I say number1 it is in reference to the outside WR. ie the 1&2 are generally on the outside with the 3 being the slot

Austin like Welker can def be "go to guys". Just like a TE. Just not number1 receivers in my definition.



So, you're telling me Welker isnt a no.1, bc he doesnt play on the outside? Gotcha

#18 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,847
  • Reputation: 474
  • LocationNonya
HUDDLER

Posted 24 March 2013 - 02:50 AM

You dont have to be able to line up every where to be a no.1. The definition of a No.1 receiver is someone who can constantly make plays and be a "go to guy", which Welker is.

I guess, get ready to see Welker in a Broncos' offense with Peyton if you wanna see him in another offense beside NE. Yea, he's definitely not going to have the same impact (sarcasm). :)

and by the way, before Welker was a Patriot he was also a Dolphin. Being a member of the Dolphins with QBs like AJ Feeley, Fiedler, Frerotte, Rosenfels, Harrington, Culpepper, and Cleo Lemon (wow, what a group!), Welker put up 1313yds (2004), 1379 (2005), and 1064 (2006).


So who would be last on this list of WR for you?

Megatron

Fitz

AJ Johnson

Welker

#19 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,847
  • Reputation: 474
  • LocationNonya
HUDDLER

Posted 24 March 2013 - 02:51 AM

So, you're telling me Welker isnt a no.1, bc he doesnt play on the outside? Gotcha


Yes pretty much. Anybody who knows football know a #1 needs to be able to line up anywhere.

#20 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    HORNETS 2014

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,678
  • Reputation: 2,761
  • LocationKurby
HUDDLER

Posted 24 March 2013 - 02:52 AM

So who would be last on this list of WR for you?

Megatron

Fitz

AJ Johnson

Welker



You're telling me there's Megatron, Fitz, and Johnson in this Draft? Theres only a Welker in this Draft.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users