Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Why Passing on a WR in the first might not be a option


  • Please log in to reply
186 replies to this topic

#111 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,847
  • Reputation: 474
  • LocationNonya
HUDDLER

Posted 25 March 2013 - 09:05 PM

If your going to post his strengths also post his weaknesses. Let's be a little unbiased.

#112 ZackAttack23

ZackAttack23

    Member

  • Joined: 05-January 12
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 581
  • Reputation: 35
HUDDLER

Posted 25 March 2013 - 09:08 PM

I say draft Austin at 14 and trade down from the 2nd round pick.

#113 DaCityKats

DaCityKats

    feed KB 2014

  • Joined: 11-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,934
  • Reputation: 894
  • LocationDa City
HUDDLER

Posted 25 March 2013 - 09:14 PM

Silva isn't the be all in scouting and their is a different opinion shared by Kevin Weidel, Mcshay, and others about his route running and his ability to handle a lot of information. You choose not to see that like you did last year with Stephen Hill.

stephen hill and cordarrelle are 2 different prospects.one is considered the top wr while the other was not.

#114 Marguide

Marguide

    South of the Border

  • Joined: 13-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,748
  • Reputation: 2,344
HUDDLER

Posted 25 March 2013 - 09:29 PM

I've been harping on WR for the last 2 years.

The time is now.

#115 tiger7_88

tiger7_88

    old skool SWAG

  • Joined: 12-May 11
  • posts: 5,744
  • Reputation: 2,482
SUPPORTER

Posted 25 March 2013 - 09:41 PM

Just because it is 'deep', does it mean it is good.

This draft class is full of #2-3 WR. Only a handful are considered to be #1 and even then they aren't a solid option.


I agree.

Which is why using the 14th overall pick for a #1 that may not even be a solid option is a bad idea IMO.

Know what's a good idea to build a solid basis for a team? Linemen linemen linemen...
  • SCP PIE'd this

#116 IamSoClutch

IamSoClutch

    CaptainCam

  • Joined: 16-January 13
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,398
  • Reputation: 664
  • LocationKinston, NC
HUDDLER

Posted 25 March 2013 - 10:03 PM

I'm beginning to think Lafell has slept with some people's girl.


You probably let him sleep with yours

#117 panthers55

panthers55

    Starting all over again

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 17,421
  • Reputation: 2,152
  • LocationAt the lake
HUDDLER

Posted 25 March 2013 - 10:24 PM

This is why drafting WR in the first round is a bad idea. THis was an article before the 2011 draft.

http://sports.espn.g...tory?id=6396194

If your team is considering drafting A.J. Green orJulio Jones, you might want to start worrying. And if that's not enough, remember that the Detroit Lions spent four top-10 picks between 2003 and 2007 on wide receivers and only one of those picks is still with the team.



The increase in passing and wide receiver usage has naturally led to an increase in wide receivers selected in the first round. From 2001 to 2010, wide receivers were the second-most drafted players in the first round, trailing only defensive backs (both corners and safeties).


The 40 first-round picks since 2001 have combined to play 199 seasons in the NFL. Only 41 of those 199 seasons (20.6 percent) saw the receiver eclipse 1,000 receiving yards. Only 17 of the 40 receivers have registered a 1,000-yard season and just nine have done it more than once.
Even if you were to ignore their rookie seasons to account for an NFL learning curve, you'd have 159 seasons and 40 1,000-yard seasons (25.2 percent). Michael Clayton was the only receiver of the group with a 1,000-yard season his rookie year and he never had more than 484 in a season after that.



No other position drafted since 2001 has seen a higher percentage of players inactive in 2010. Eleven of the 40 first-round receivers did not play in a game last season, meaning 72.5 percent of all first-round receivers played. Defensive backs (79.3 percent) were the only other position to dip below 80 percent.
Those 11 wide receivers averaged 5.1 seasons in their careers. Five of those receivers played their last games in or prior to 2006. Only two other offensive players drafted in 2001 or later (running back William Green and tackleKenyatta Walker) were out by 2006.




When thinking of the difference between a first-round receiver and a second-round-or-later receiver, one 20-yard catch per game probably isn't what comes to mind, but players like Greg Jennings, Chad Ochocinco, Vincent Jackson, Anquan Boldin, Brandon Marshall and Mike Wallace(among others) have helped close that gap.
A.J. Green and Julio Jones are the only two wide receivers projected to go in the first round this month, according to both Todd McShay's and Mel Kiper's most recent mock drafts. Both could translate to 1,000-yard talents, but statistically speaking, each has only a one-in-four shot to be a real difference maker.



#118 top dawg

top dawg

    The Creative Cat

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,327
  • Reputation: 2,937
  • LocationWITHIN MY MIND'S EYE
HUDDLER

Posted 25 March 2013 - 10:32 PM

I have been a big supporter of trading down or drafting a WR in the 2nd round. But it is looking like if we wait til the 2nd round there might not be a viable WR at the 44th pick.

Most of you think I have been on the bandwagon to draft Austin at 14 because Im labeled a WVU Homer. That wasnt the case until now. I would much prefer us to trade down to the mid 20 picks and grab a extra pick in the 2nd or 3rd round. But that most likely wont happen. Looking at the latest mocks a lot of WR thought to be avaible at the 44th pick are moving up to the late first round.

So with said the 14th pick should be Austin or Patterson. If we can trade down to the mid 20's then we can grab either Hunter , Hopkins or Allen. To me we need to grab one of these in the draft. Honestly I couldnt care which one but anything past them wont help us down the road.


I am not necessary thinking that we have to draft 89's heir apparent this year, but I do think that we need someone who can at least bridge the gap. Someone like Swope or Patterson would probably most certainly help us not only down the road, but in the coming year. As long as we got 89, we don't have to address needs at WR in one fell swoop. Austin or Patterson likely wouldn't be the complete answer to our problems at WR, but I would still take one of them (esp. Austin).

#119 Udogg

Udogg

    Cardiac Victim since 95

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,642
  • Reputation: 1,606
HUDDLER

Posted 25 March 2013 - 10:33 PM

Dwayne Jarrett says "Hey".



What round was dwayne drafted again?

#120 frash.exe

frash.exe

    Freddy Frashbear

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 14,942
  • Reputation: 5,489
HUDDLER

Posted 25 March 2013 - 10:44 PM

you see... BOTH OF THOSE RECEIVERS WHO HAVE AVERAGED OVER 1,000 REC. YARDS PER SEASON HAVE A ONE IN FOUR CHANCE OF SUCCEEDING IN THE NFL!

oh, ESPN, when was the last time you were dead on about something?


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users