Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The problem, Hardy and C.J. gives us so much, we have to give Hardy some of what he wants

19 posts in this topic

Posted

TLDR AT BOTTOM

We all know Hardy wants that big contract, we all know we ain't got room for it, and we all know that Gettis isn't going to give Hardy's agent exactly what he wants.. which is C.J.'s contract. I say we can live with mediocre defensive tackles, maybe we draft a gem after try # 20, who knows, but I think without so much money wrapped into linebackers now, we could invest next year with having the start of a defensive end dynasty. We already have a stud linebacker with 2 other linebackers that are studs if they can go full speed. Our secondary was fine without Gamble last year, our Safeties lost us games. But what if via draft/free agency our safety situation changed and evolved over the next 5-6 years, how dominant of a pass rush would we have while Cam comes into his prime putting a lot of teams behind?

I know Hardy will be expensive, but what I'm saying, is that if we keep him, the entire secondary as a whole can be playing the marinara on Sunday's for the next 6 years and it wouldn't matter because most teams would be giving up sacks while they are behind.

TL;DR:We should try everything short of C.J. contract or above to keep Hardy as it will allow us to not have a secondary.

Play with this to get an idea of Gettleman's philosophy. Just click the switch botton that looks like your browsers "Refresh" button but much larger, to get the defense of the giants and the defense of the panthers up. Not much difference.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/interactive/2013/jan/30/nfl-salaries-team-position#new-york-giants,carolina-panthers

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

If Frank Alexander flashes this year, Hardy is probably as good as traded.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Somebody showed the numbers a few weeks back that showed CJ's contract made him a likely cap casualty toward the end of it. He'd be right near 30 and would be garnering an absolutely stupid cap hit.

If Hardy comes out and plays well again, we may try to move Johnson or just cut him outright.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Somebody showed the numbers a few weeks back that showed CJ's contract made him a likely cap casualty toward the end of it. He'd be right near 30 and would be garnering an absolutely stupid cap hit.

If Hardy comes out and plays well again, we may try to move Johnson or just cut him outright.

Seems like the most logical move.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Gettleman is making his mark. No more ridiculous contracts. He'll be fair. And if the player doesn't like it, he can leave. If a player doesn't want to restructure to help the team then be cut or traded. No more bending over and taking it raw like Hurney loved to do with players.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

People on this board on gonna flip poo if Hardy gets traded....But it is the logical moove.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Double post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

The notion that you "have to" pay a certain player is kind of what got us to the spot we're in now :unsure:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Hardy has played well for us but only in his/just before contract yr:

Tck. Sck. F

2012 61 (41). 11 (12.5) 2 (7) 2011 50 (40) 4. (9). 1 (1) 2010 30 (62) 3 (11.5) 2 (1)

CJ's numbers are in (). I don't see a big contract rght now. Hopefully CJ may restructure so we can resign him to a resonable contract.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Hardy should talk to his buddy CJ about wanting a new contract since he's eating a lot of the cap.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

The notion that you "have to" pay a certain player is kind of what got us to the spot we're in now :unsure:

Yup, agree. And to pay a player the certain amount of money on the market is the bigger problem. We overpaid CJ thinking Ray Edwards was going to get a huge deal somewhere (Atl), while he who had almost identical stats to CJ coming out of FA was had for like "half" of CJ's contract. We paid Dwill, etc. money that was the market value.

Good teams in whatever reasons find ways to keep or add players for less than their market value i.e., Seattle signings of Avril and Bennett.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

The notion that you "have to" pay a certain player is kind of what got us to the spot we're in now :unsure:

yep. this mindset needs to be avoided. cam and maybe kuechly are the only two players this should be applied to and even then we shouldn't pay above market value.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites