Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Is Beason going to restructure?


  • Please log in to reply
66 replies to this topic

#46 Boner Champ

Boner Champ

    Future Training Camp MVP

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,586 posts

Posted 28 March 2013 - 11:06 AM

How many damn times do people need to ask about Beason restructuring? His contract is very, very difficult to do anything with. You can't cut him, you can't trade him and you can't restructure him.

I swear I want to punch the screen every time someone suggests we restructure Beason or someone talks about him doing the right thing for the team. Jesus Christ, where's the tylenol.


It seriously makes me smile to think that my post makes a grown(?) man want to punch his computer screen!
God I love winning at teh Internet!

#47 pantherclaw

pantherclaw

    Wise Ass

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,814 posts
  • LocationGalveston

Posted 28 March 2013 - 11:11 AM

Cut them all.

Cut every player that isn't on their rookie contract.
Fill those position with mothing but low tier players.

Championship!

#48 Boner Champ

Boner Champ

    Future Training Camp MVP

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,586 posts

Posted 28 March 2013 - 11:19 AM

Hey, everyone that wants Beason or any player to take a pay cut.

Consider this.

you will be at your current job at most 8 more years
you make good money
your performance has been great, then due to some illness it went down, you can still be a solid worker tho
the company wants to add more workers
they are likely to fire you next year
the company wants you to take a 20% cut in pay

do you do it?


If so, you are a moron.


I'm still trying to wrap my head around the fact that Beason is #56 on the Forbes list of the WORLDS highest paid athletes....ohh and he has not played a game in a year

http://www.forbes.co...ile/jon-beason/

#49 Kurb

Kurb

    I hit it.

  • Administrators
  • 13,647 posts
  • LocationILM

Posted 28 March 2013 - 11:20 AM

I'm still trying to wrap my head around the fact that Beason is #56 on the Forbes list of the WORLDS highest paid athletes....ohh and he has not played a game in a year



How is that Jon Beasons problem?

#50 Boner Champ

Boner Champ

    Future Training Camp MVP

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,586 posts

Posted 28 March 2013 - 11:23 AM

How is that Jon Beasons problem?


It's not his problem.....its the Carolina Panthers problem.....beast is one of my all time Panthers.

#51 Boner Champ

Boner Champ

    Future Training Camp MVP

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,586 posts

Posted 28 March 2013 - 11:29 AM

If it is any consultation....
CJ is the #15 highest paid athletes in the world.....http://www.forbes.com/profile/charles-johnson-2/

DW is number 66

Kalil is 71

http://www.forbes.com/athletes/list/

That's effing crazy!



#52 pantherclaw

pantherclaw

    Wise Ass

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,814 posts
  • LocationGalveston

Posted 28 March 2013 - 12:04 PM

Welcome to the NFL.

#53 Fan01

Fan01

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 660 posts

Posted 28 March 2013 - 12:32 PM

It seriously makes me smile to think that my post makes a grown(?) man want to punch his computer screen!
God I love winning at teh Internet!


I get over it quick. But come on, it's like ESPN talking about Cam's sophmore slump when he has almost identical stats from his rookie year or putting "No adding Sugar" on ice creme and marketing it as diet. It's still got 40 grams of sugar already in it!

And how do you know I'm a grown man. I could be a 12 year old girl or a tiger.

#54 CPF4LIFE

CPF4LIFE

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,489 posts

Posted 28 March 2013 - 12:52 PM

Beason didnt get hurt till AFTER he got his contract and at the time, he was worth that and nobody was really complaining. Everybody thought he was the best LB in the league after Willis at the time. No matter how people want to lash out at it or hurney, it wasnt really a bad move it, was just unfortunate with him getting hurt afterwards. Just putting that out there, i think every move made should be judged individually and not collectively out of frustration. The D Will, Stewart, Godfrey moves were really the only ones i had problems with.

#55 DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

    Senior Member

  • Moderators
  • 26,288 posts

Posted 28 March 2013 - 09:28 PM

Beason didnt get hurt till AFTER he got his contract and at the time, he was worth that and nobody was really complaining. Everybody thought he was the best LB in the league after Willis at the time. No matter how people want to lash out at it or hurney, it wasnt really a bad move it, was just unfortunate with him getting hurt afterwards. Just putting that out there, i think every move made should be judged individually and not collectively out of frustration. The D Will, Stewart, Godfrey moves were really the only ones i had problems with.


He was still overpaid...good player but overpaid. Not enough big plays for that type deal



#56 csx

csx

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,379 posts

Posted 28 March 2013 - 09:35 PM

I'm still trying to wrap my head around the fact that Beason is #56 on the Forbes list of the WORLDS highest paid athletes....ohh and he has not played a game in a year

http://www.forbes.co...ile/jon-beason/


Eh...he played 4 games this season


#57 CPF4LIFE

CPF4LIFE

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,489 posts

Posted 28 March 2013 - 09:40 PM

He was still overpaid...good player but overpaid. Not enough big plays for that type deal


Beason made plenty of big plays when he was healthy. You seemed to have forgot. He made pro bowls, he was arguably the best LB in the league, you dont just say that about someone who only racks up tackles.

#58 DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

    Senior Member

  • Moderators
  • 26,288 posts

Posted 28 March 2013 - 09:46 PM

Beason made plenty of big plays when he was healthy. You seemed to have forgot. He made pro bowls, he was arguably the best LB in the league, you dont just say that about someone who only racks up tackles.


Compare Beason 4 years in to someone like Urlacher 4 years in....

He was good....but he didn't have the big play resume for that payday. Willis had it. His claim was the best MLB in a league where half the teams run a 3-4 and there weren't any young standouts.

Not knocking Beason but he was like all the others....paid on the next tier higher than he should of.

#59 CPF4LIFE

CPF4LIFE

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,489 posts

Posted 28 March 2013 - 09:59 PM

Compare Beason 4 years in to someone like Urlacher 4 years in....

He was good....but he didn't have the big play resume for that payday. Willis had it. His claim was the best MLB in a league where half the teams run a 3-4 and there weren't any young standouts.

Not knocking Beason but he was like all the others....paid on the next tier higher than he should of.


Of course you would say this after not be able to watching him play the past 2 years, i understand. Typical.

#60 DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

    Senior Member

  • Moderators
  • 26,288 posts

Posted 28 March 2013 - 10:16 PM

Of course you would say this after not be able to watching him play the past 2 years, i understand. Typical.


First 4 years as a starter...MLB/ILBs

15 sacks, 8 FF, 2 TD, 4 INTs
21 sacks, 4 FF, 1 TD, 6 INTs
4 sacks, 3 FF, 0 TD, 8 INTs
16 sacks, 6 FF, 0 TD, 6 INTs
14 sacks, 4 FF, 0 TD, 2 INTs
9.5 sacks, 6 FF, 0 TD, 7 INTs (played only 1/3 of one season of the 4)

4 years in....Beason wasn't making the big plays to invest quite that many dollars....you can still be good and overpaid. Which one is Beason?


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com