Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

KKL's after combine Mock.


29 posts in this topic

Posted

not going to lie, I really don't like the first two picks.....would much rather have

1st Cyprien

2nd Hankins

2nd Rodgers

although I would love the trade, and that is pretty realistic

1. I like Cyprein but I wanted to go either WR or DT in the 1st. Plus Reid isn't a bad substitute.

.2. Williams can play NT because of his strength and UT because of his quickness and first step. He will be a better player then Hankins.

3. IMO Rogers is no different then Lafell. So I choose to go with the 4.3 speed deep threat Stills. Who is actually different from other WR's we have on the roster.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

i love the Kenny Stills pick, he is one of my favorite WR prospects.(Allen, Patterson, Hopkins, and Stills)

I thought Stills was a good pick in the 3rd too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Only thing i really like is Williams and David Amerson with the. Wr should be with the 1st or 2nd pick. after the that with why not go with the bpa OT with the recent news on Gross.

1. WR

2. DT

2. CB

3. OT

Reason behind the trade was actually good

Dude I have the potential to have 3 starters on defense and good deep threat 3rd Wr. With the 1st 4 picks. Then you add the pass catching TE for 2 TE sets. And we have given Cam and Luke weapons to play with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

This pleases me

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

1. I like Cyprein but I wanted to go either WR or DT in the 1st. Plus Reid isn't a bad substitute.

.2. Williams can play NT because of his strength and UT because of his quickness and first step. He will be a better player then Hankins.

3. IMO Rogers is no different then Lafell. So I choose to go with the 4.3 speed deep threat Stills. Who is actually different from other WR's we have on the roster.

I wouldn't change the Stills pick, i wouldn't mind double dipping at wide-out this draft

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I wouldn't change the Stills pick, i wouldn't mind double dipping at wide-out this draft

There are to many young WR's on the roster under the age of 26 that we still have no clue about to double dip at that position. Plus people forget we will still run the ball a lot. We won't be the Greenbay Packers throwing the ball all over the field.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

There are to many young WR's on the roster under the age of 26 that we still have no clue about to double dip at that position. Plus people forget we will still run the ball a lot. We won't be the Greenbay Packers throwing the ball all over the field.

WRs that aren't very good---Armanti and Pilares are likely done, Adams and Gettis are no guarantee either.

The only safe receivers are Smitty and LaFell, bank on that

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

WRs that aren't very good---Armanti and Pilares are likely done, Adams and Gettis are no guarantee either.

The only safe receivers are Smitty and LaFell, bank on that

I think AE has had enough chances I agree. But Pilares, Gettis, Adams and Bryant are still ? That deserve opportunity. Anybody we draft isn't a guarantee either that's just as big of a risk as the WR already on the roster. The only differences is the guys on the roster already know the system already know and worked with Cam and are cheaper.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Love the trade, hate the picks. Pretty sure we could have gotten better players.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Really like trade and that would be awesome if it actually happened. Like the Hughes pick in the 5th, might not make it that far though, probably a safer bet if you want him to go ahead and nab him in the 4th.

I don't like the first 3 picks at all, think there would be better value players at each of those picks. Don't mind the positions that much, just the players picked.

Stills in the third is a nice pick as well. I think OL should have been addressed somewhere even if it was just for depth.

I'd take like Taylor or Poyer over Amerson, Elam over Reid if your going safety there at all. I'd rather Cyprien, but I doubt he's still on the board with either of those picks in the second round. "Godfrey is expected to play FS and is a better player there then at SS"

I'd rather have Jesse Williams or Hankings at 31 in this mock and both would most likely be there and have higher ratings then Williams.

Also Gooden isn't going to be there in the 6th round, dude's got a 3rd round grade. That's one hell of a slide for any player.

A more likely pick there in the 6th is Eric Martin from Nebraska or Travis Johnson from San Jose State.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Really like trade and that would be awesome if it actually happened. Like the Hughes pick in the 5th, might not make it that far though, probably a safer bet if you want him to go ahead and nab him in the 4th.

I don't like the first 3 picks at all, think there would be better value players at each of those picks. Don't mind the positions that much, just the players picked.

Stills in the third is a nice pick as well. I think OL should have been addressed somewhere even if it was just for depth.

I'd take like Taylor or Poyer over Amerson, Elam over Reid if your going safety there at all. I'd rather Cyprien, but I doubt he's still on the board with either of those picks in the second round. "Godfrey is expected to play FS and is a better player there then at SS"

I'd rather have Jesse Williams or Hankings at 31 in this mock and both would most likely be there and have higher ratings then Williams.

Also Gooden isn't going to be there in the 6th round, dude's got a 3rd round grade. That's one hell of a slide for any player.

A more likely pick there in the 6th is Eric Martin? from Nebraska or Travis Johnson from San Jose State.

Thanks for the feed back.

1. I think Sly ability to play both Nt and Ut is a bigger plus for me. Then having 2 down NT's like Jesse and Hankins.

2. I like Reid at SS and Godfrey at FS more then Elam at FS and Godfrey at SS. And we both agree that Cyphier won't be there.

3. I think Amerson is due for a bounce back in the pro's. He was considered a top 5 pick before his down year this year. Size and Speed combination is what the league is going to at the Cb position and he has that.

4. Gooden was my lucky pick but I can go with the best OLB in the 6th round.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

1. I thi

Hmmm, not sure what happened here. lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites