Which is more profitable, to give a person a one-time dosage of a curing agent, or to keep them alive for an extended period on a regimen of "treatment" drugs that keep them alive but don't cure their condition? The people making the "treatment" drugs to prolong lives are already among the richest in the world, they don't need to make a cure.
Statements like this are really frustrating to me. There are many negative side effects that occur because of the pharmaceutical industry, but to suggest that the entire purpose is to suppress the identification of disease curing agents is laughable and disingenuous. There isn't one big pharmaceutical company, there are hundreds and anyone that found an actual cure to cancer or HIV would automatically become some o the richest people in the world. Also,a lot of diseases have been basically "cured" through vaccines if we can continue to get people to keep using them and not take medical advice from Jenny McCarthy.
There are tens of thousands of scientist and doctors that have dedicated their entire lives to helping others in the pharmaceutical industry and to think they are all in on some grand conspiracy to kill people off is almost offensive. Why are people all over the world dying from cancer still if DCA is so great at curing it? Why is cancer still the number 1 cause of death in Canada? Do you think that all the oncologist out there that meet new patients everyday are not giving them the best treatment out there because of some kickback from the pharmaceutical industry?
I don't have all the answers about DCA but there is no doubt in my mind that pharmaceutical companies have something to do with the lack of progress in its widespread usage. It's generic, so it would be awfully hard for one company to patent it and make money off of it.
Name me one disease that is among the world's leading killers that has been CURED in the last 20 years. The medical/medical research field is much different now than the one that developed cures and/or vaccines for polio, hepatitis, and the like long ago. People can pretend like these people are still out there trying to develop a cure, but most ARE NOT.
DCA is PROVEN to kill cancer, even the American Cancer Society acknowledged it has shown promise IIRC... Look up the Snopes article on it. But in the same statement regarding its promise, the ACS wanted to "caution" people to not view it as a "magic bullet" aka OPTION.
And all of this isn't derived from some infowars crap, I actually first gained interest in the pharma industrial complex from articles we had to read my first semester in college.
Money makes the world go round, that's the bottom line. I could be wrong, but odds are, I'm closer to the truth than not. All of these things are NOT coincidence.