Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Mr. Scot

Would you let this man develop your quarterback?

24 posts in this topic

So let's say for a moment that you're the agent for one of this year's top QB prospects.

(First and most important question: Why are you surfing a message board? But we'll let that slide for now)

You have the prospect of your client going to the Chiefs and learning under Andy Reid. During his time in the NFL, Reid has developed a reputation for being a quarterback guru with Donovan McNabb being his prize pupil. If your client goes to KC, maybe he can be the next Reid student to make a big name for himself.

But there's a caveat...

Reid's disciples have been shown to be system quarterbacks. To a man, any one of them that's tried to make a living playing outside of Reid's offense has failed (miserably, in some cases). Now, some might cite Jeff Garcia as one who succeeded elsewhere, but Reid didn't actually develop Garcia and even he couldn't function worth squat unless he was in a West Coast Offense.

So while your client might turn out to be a top QB in the league under Reid's tutelage, he may do so only as long as he's tied to Reid. That could be an issue when it comes time for free agency.

So would you hope for your guy to be picked by the Chiefs, or would you rather see him elsewhere?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Alex Smith is their QB and will do extremely well.

As an OT and the 1st pick I have no issues with Reid's style of play.

MIcheal Vick had a lot of success in Atlanta before being "forced" into Reid's system and played well when healthy in Philly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It basically just boils down to McNabb playing badly in Washington, right? Nobody really expected much out of Kolb, Feely, or Fiedler. And he also "developed" Favre, though not as a head coach, so I don't think people look at him as a system guy so much as a coach that can fit a system around a QB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Umm, hell yes. What gets overlooked in this talk of Reid being a "system" coach is that the quarterbacks that left his tutelage weren't all that great in the first place (like Kolb) or were unmotivated on their new teams (McNabb.) And Kolb was hampered by the absolute worst offensive line in the entire NFL being asked to perform an offense unsuited to his strengths.

And the track record on Reid as a head coach isn't that long, you basically have McNabb, Kolb, Vick and Foles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Reid had his team contending for championships year in and year out. I wouldn't be concerned with my guy going there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It basically just boils down to McNabb playing badly in Washington, right? Nobody really expected much out of Kolb, Feely, or Fiedler. And he also "developed" Favre, though not as a head coach, so I don't think people look at him as a system guy so much as a coach that can fit a system around a QB.

The Dolphins expected enough out of Feeley to trade a second round pick for him. And I'm pretty sure the Cards had bigger plans for Kolb when they got him for a second rounder and Dominique Rogers-Cromartie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Dolphins expected enough out of Feeley to trade a second round pick for him. And I'm pretty sure the Cards had bigger plans for Kolb when they got him for a second rounder and Dominique Rogers-Cromartie.

And everyone laughed at them for making those trades. Just because some teams got desperate doesn't mean the rational world thought highly of the QBs they were targeting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Considering they won't be picking a QB first overall it really isn't relevant. Although, if they were I really don't see why anyone would think twice about going to him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Reid had his team contending for championships year in and year out. I wouldn't be concerned with my guy going there.

What do you do if, after his initial contract runs out, the Chiefs next contract offer to him is underwhelming?

There's a decent track record of other teams getting burned by having big expectations of Reid pupils. Are you confident that he can get a better offer in free agency despite that history?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And everyone laughed at them for making those trades. Just because some teams got desperate doesn't mean the rational world thought highly of the QBs they were targeting.

I know. I was one of the people laughing. Makes me wonder whether future teams will be gun shy.

And that's kinda the heart of the question. Do you want your NFL success to be closely tied to a particular guy and/or his system?

Basically, is success still worth it if it limits your options?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Looks like our DE depth is developing nicely.  Let's see his swim move--no wait--if he starts drowning, we'll never get him back in the boat. I still say they were a bit upset with him last season.  Remember the benching during the game following the altercationwith the coach?  Some people never recover fully from a knee injury, especially if they lack the discipline to rehab properly.  I wounder if that is the case? Seriously--he is a TE.
    • http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/carrier-plant-where-trump-saved-jobs-plans-layoffs/ar-BBBsNjX?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp A plant where jobs were purportedly saved by Donald Trump ahead of his inauguration is set to make at least 600 staff cuts, many before Christmas. Carrier had opted in December 2016 not to move a number of jobs to Mexico from its Indianapolis furnace factory, following a visit to the plant by Trump. The president claimed he had convinced Carrier to retain 1,100 jobs in Indianapolis rather than outsourcing them in Mexico. And of those 1,100 jobs Trump spoke of, 300 had reportedly never been threatened with a move to Mexico—meaning a total of 800 jobs had been saved. But the company has since announced that at least 600 employees at the factory will still be laid off, with the final 290 job cuts coming just ahead of Christmas. In a filing seen by CNN, the company announced it would be making an initial 338 job cuts in July, four in October and a further 290 jobs on December 22, just three days before Christmas. During a press conference at Carrier, Trump said: “that big, big beautiful plant behind us… will be even more beautiful in about seven months from now. They're so happy. They're going to have a great Christmas. That's most important. He added: “And that these companies aren't going to be leaving anymore. They're not going to be taking people's hearts out. They're not going to be announcing, like they did at Carrier, that they're closing up and they're moving to Mexico, over 1,100 jobs. “And by the way, that number is going to go up very substantially as they expand this area, this plant. So the 1,100 is going to be a minimum number,” he said. The plant said at the time the number of jobs saved was closer to 800, but explained it would be replacing some of the jobs that were saved with an automated system in order to save money, although CEO Greg Hayes did say there would be less money saved by the company in doing so than if they moved production to Mexico. Carrier did not immediately respond to Newsweek’s request for comment. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I'm thinking of another person I'd like to see get laid off, or fired.
    • Shep, Curtis Samuel, maybe Charles Johnson--Funchess in year 3--that could be solid.  Move KB to TE (or keep him away from the Krispy Kremes) and this could be a special group.