A Look at Our Current Fat Bodies
Posted 02 April 2013 - 11:55 AM
Hangartner and Garry Williams are still on the roster, which scares me a bit. Williams has the measurables, but has sucked. Hagartner is C/LG depth, not RG.
If we sign Hixon, that gives us Hixon, Smith, and Lafell, with Gettis and Ginn on deck. Sure we could upgrade WR, but that is solid compared to DT and RG.
Are we going DT (maybe a NT AND an UT) and G in the draft? If it were tomorrow, probably so.
Posted 02 April 2013 - 12:12 PM
if this OL draft is as good as people are talking about, there's going to be some vet OL hitting the streets because there were cheaper alternatives in the draft. when that happens, we'll probably be more active. i expect that we'll see several picked up heading into TC and a good bit of competion for the starting gig. considering we'll have gettleman's eye doing the scouting, i'm pretty sure we'll have decent choices.
Good point. We do not have to fill every position before the draft. I am pretty certain we will draft 1 lineman in the 4th round or later. A rookie and a veteran. Looks like we are doing that at DT and G, if my guess is correct.
Posted 02 April 2013 - 02:51 PM
Also take into account that he resigned Edwards. That's a huge plus. Without him the interior part of the defensive line would be a lot worse.
Posted 02 April 2013 - 04:00 PM
Posted 02 April 2013 - 04:16 PM
Draft O-line, WR or DT in the first 2 rounds and I will be a happy camper.
Posted 02 April 2013 - 04:26 PM
Posted 02 April 2013 - 04:57 PM
After we get a RG, we're good to go into 2013. A VET and a 4th or 5th rounder.
NT is what I'm worried about. Looking very good that DT is the position at 14.
Why is it looking good then if NT is the biggest concern? Won't be a NT on the board worth the 14th pick.
Posted 02 April 2013 - 05:05 PM
I'd like to sign Glenn Dorsey for NT and take another DT in the top 2 rounds.
I wanted Dorsey here as well but he is now a 49er.