Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

Bacarri Rambo in the second?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
42 replies to this topic

#16 csx

csx

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 31-December 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,920
  • Reputation: 2,319
HUDDLER

Posted 04 April 2013 - 09:55 AM

I wouldn't trust a college student who never touched marijuana.

#17 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,800
  • Reputation: 7,958
Moderators

Posted 04 April 2013 - 10:01 AM

Wasn't the drug related suspension based on a positive test for marijuana? I don't really condone the use of the stuff, but I wouldn't really be up in arms over some weed use. It's not like he was hooked on meth or heroin, right?

i don't know. i was just throwing poo out there.

if it was just the brownie episode then it's really a non-factor. i suspect hat he'd be properly vetted and probably more so because of the suspension/failed drug test. it's hard to believe it would be just one incident so they'd probably check it out completely.

and count me in on those who love the idea of a guy name rambo anywhere on defense, esp. one as abusive as he can be.

if you add him and a beast like jesse williams and still manage to get a good WR in the draft i would consider it to be a monumental success.

problem with thumper safties like rambo and even cyprien is that they are likely to get flags thrown at them occassionally by "safeties are mean bullies" rules that they started enforcing last year...although i think the penalties would be worth it because of the hits and the fear instilled in the WRs.

#18 Peppers90 NC

Peppers90 NC

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 03-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 10,488
  • Reputation: 1,721
HUDDLER

Posted 04 April 2013 - 10:06 AM

I wouldn't trust a college student who never touched marijuana.

agreed

#19 Peppers90 NC

Peppers90 NC

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 03-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 10,488
  • Reputation: 1,721
HUDDLER

Posted 04 April 2013 - 10:09 AM

Best case scenario we can trade back later in first pick up an extra 2nd or 3rd rounder, address safety there. I'd prefer that over Vaccaro in the first

#20 Dash Global

Dash Global

    Member

  • Joined: 12-November 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,050
  • Reputation: 139
HUDDLER

Posted 04 April 2013 - 10:27 AM

Sheldon Richardson is a top-15 talent


Maybe for a 3-4 team needing a DE

He is to much of a liability in the run game as an UT. Much better suited in a 3-4 imo

#21 Luuuuuuuuuuke59

Luuuuuuuuuuke59

    NOT NEWB

  • Joined: 12-October 12
  • PipPip
  • posts: 95
  • Reputation: 76
ROOKIE

Posted 04 April 2013 - 10:47 AM

i think the penalties would be worth it because of the hits and the fear instilled in the WRs.


Nail on the head there. I would love this guy in rd 3 if he was there. I think he fits well into our D scheme of hard hitters.

I would love to see our D earn a feared reputation for hard hits, even if we get a few flags here or there... re: THE KRAKEN

#22 Promethean Forerunner

Promethean Forerunner

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 15-February 13
  • posts: 8,578
  • Reputation: 3,559
SUPPORTER

Posted 04 April 2013 - 11:03 AM

I wouldn't trust a college student who never touched marijuana.


Eh. [shrugs]

#23 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    HORNETS 2014

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,678
  • Reputation: 2,761
HUDDLER

Posted 04 April 2013 - 11:15 AM

Would not mind at 44

#24 Peppers90 NC

Peppers90 NC

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 03-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 10,488
  • Reputation: 1,721
HUDDLER

Posted 04 April 2013 - 11:16 AM

i wouldnt mind reaching for him in the 2nd, depending on which direction we go in the first

Allen/Rambo combo isn't a bad option.

#25 Delhommey

Delhommey

    Moderator

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 12,778
  • Reputation: 2,457
Moderators

Posted 04 April 2013 - 11:21 AM

I'd think Cyprien and Swearinger would both be there and both be better choices.

#26 SCMunnerlyn1

SCMunnerlyn1

    The Fuhckening has begun

  • Joined: 10-August 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,734
  • Reputation: 464
HUDDLER

Posted 04 April 2013 - 12:10 PM

Whiny bitch .. do not want

@gamecocksblog UGA's Bacarri Rambo with the head-scratcher quote of the day, on Lattimore: "He wasn't very tough. We were just missing tackles."

for more laughter at his stupidity check this thread http://www.cockytalk...ad.php?t=133363

#27 KJ89

KJ89

    bottom line

  • Joined: 15-October 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,129
  • Reputation: 1,937
HUDDLER

Posted 04 April 2013 - 12:13 PM

Posted Image

#28 Herbert The Love Bug

Herbert The Love Bug

    Stripper Name: Bo Dangles

  • Joined: 04-August 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,567
  • Reputation: 2,313
HUDDLER

Posted 04 April 2013 - 12:16 PM

We would have to seriously reach.

There isnt a DT that will be on the board worthy of the 14th pick.


If Star falls he is worth it. Don't be dumb

#29 TANTRIC-NINJA

TANTRIC-NINJA

    Dey Hate Us Because They Aint Us!

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,811
  • Reputation: 2,238
HUDDLER

Posted 04 April 2013 - 12:16 PM

If you like a guy..n he is projected in the 3rd..you have no 3rd..so a reach happens.

Its why I get confused when someone says no player A is projected late first not top 15...if thats your guy you have to take him where you pick bc he will not be there in the second.

#30 SOJA

SOJA

    Official Panthers Fan

  • Joined: 09-November 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 10,714
  • Reputation: 1,887
HUDDLER

Posted 04 April 2013 - 12:55 PM

Posted Image