4-3, 3-4: Which one is harder to beat?
Posted 04 April 2013 - 10:42 AM
Posted 04 April 2013 - 10:47 AM
Posted 04 April 2013 - 10:50 AM
Posted 04 April 2013 - 10:55 AM
Posted 04 April 2013 - 10:56 AM
i would add to it how well the system is coached and run/executed.
A well run 4-3 is just as successful as a well run 3-4. Each defense requires different styles and different type of personnel to successfully run and beat it. It's all about the personnel you have and the matchups you create.
Posted 04 April 2013 - 11:06 AM
Posted 04 April 2013 - 11:32 AM
it's all about the personal you have..and a mixture is always best. sometiems when defenses fail it isn't so much scheme as it is not having the right peices in places for said scheme and trying to make it work. if you don't have the personal any either scheme will fail
Posted 04 April 2013 - 11:35 AM
Like any scheme it comes down to running it effectively and having the right players to make it work.
They've both been around for a while, both are responsible for some Lombardi's, so I don't think one is any better than the other.
My preference is the 43 because I think it's easier to get the personnel to use as a base and still throw in 43 looks.
Posted 04 April 2013 - 01:05 PM