Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Doughboy88

4-3, 3-4: Which one is harder to beat?

31 posts in this topic

I am curious to see which base defense is overall harder to beat. Does practicing against your own 4-3 or 3-4 help better prepare you for the same style defense? Last year 13/32 teams had a base 3-4 defense, and 7 of those teams made the playoffs. I will be crunching the numbers later for 2012 and how they both styles impacted each team. We played 11 games facing a 4-3 and won 5 of them. Of the 3-4 teams, we won 2/5. Clearly this does not have any significant impact on the matter but maybe after all 32 teams are analyzed for 2012, there may be a trend. Maybe practicing against a 3-4 tends to lose more games against 4-3 teams and visa-versa. If there is a web site with this info already, please chime in!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3-4 more versatile and can disguise defenses and blitzes better

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it just depends on who is on the field.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A well run 4-3 is just as successful as a well run 3-4. Each defense requires different styles and different type of personnel to successfully run and beat it. It's all about the personnel you have and the matchups you create.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't it something like 9 of the last 13 team SB winners were 3-4s? The notable defense exception is the NY Giants and their tremendous Defensive Ends.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A well run 4-3 is just as successful as a well run 3-4. Each defense requires different styles and different type of personnel to successfully run and beat it. It's all about the personnel you have and the matchups you create.

i would add to it how well the system is coached and run/executed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

easy, whoever has the better players and coaches

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4-3 with players athletic enough to run 3-4 hybrid sets

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd imagine 4-3 is better against the run, while 3-4 would be better for timed-route, pocket passers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Topics

  • Posts



    • Sent using the amazing CarolinaHuddle mobile app

    • Love the Cobb comparison, and Samuel could even be better.   Here are comparable measurements....   Cobb-- 5'10, 191 lbs, 31 arm length, 9 3/8 hands, 4.46 40yd, 16 bench, 33.5 vert, 115 broad, 7.08 3 cone, 4.34 shuttle Curt-- 5'11, 195 lbs,  31.25 arm length, 9 1/2 hands, 4.31 40yd, 18 bench, 37 vert, 119 broad, 7.09 3 cone, 4.33 shuttle   the only thing Cobb beats him in is the 3 cone drill. Curtis beats Cobb in every other measurable, and is taller and 5 lbs bigger. They even have similar birthdays and were drafted at 20 yrs old each, cobb turned 21 in august of his rookie year, Samuel will be 21 in august.