Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Voter ID bill to be filed Thursday

31 posts in this topic

Posted

http://www.wral.com/...rsday/12304181/

Raleigh, N.C. — House Speaker Thom Tillis and Republican House leaders will file a voter identification proposal Thursday after what Tillis says has been "a transparent and deliberative process" of seeking public input. "This bill has had more discussion than anything in recent history," said House Elections Committee Co-chairman Tim Moore.

Under the proposal, beginning in 2016, voters would be required to show a photo ID at the polls. The bill would allow "multiple forms of state-issued ID," according to Rep. Tom Murry, R-Wake, including tribal cards, public university IDs and state employee IDs. Private university IDs would not qualify.

Voters without a photo ID will be allowed to cast a provisional ballot but would have to return to their local board of elections with a valid photo ID to have the ballot counted.

Approved forms of IDs that have expired would be accepted up to 10 years from their date of issuance or date of expiration.

For voters over 70, a photo ID that was valid at the time they were 70 will be considered valid indefinitely.

The bill would allow free voter IDs as well as free copies of birth certificates for those who are willing to attest under the penalty of perjury, a felony, that they have a "financial hardship." The definition of "financial hardship" has not yet been provided.

Those who can pay for their photo ID would be required to do so.

People with disabilities as defined in federal law would not be required to show ID.

The bill also makes changes to absentee voting by mail. The forms would be pre-printed, which Tillis says will make the process easier. But beginning in 2014, they will require the submission of a driver's license number, the final four digits of a Social Security number or other federally-approved identification documents like a copy of a utility bill.

In addition...it will open studies to look into things like

The act also directs the State Board of Elections to study the feasibility of creating a statewide digital database of photos, perhaps using facial recognition software, according to Rep. Harry Warren, R-Rowan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

The provision at the bottom seems big brotherish.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

The provision at the bottom seems big brotherish.

How so.

If we had retinal scans think how much faster we could make the voting process. No one knows who you voted for...just you are who you say you are.

By the way...we've blown by 1984.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

And it's pretty clear you're gunning for position in the Ministry of Truth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

So you don't like gun registration because it makes it easier for the government "round up guns" but you're okay with the government having facial recognition or retinal scanning software for everyone?

Big government is okay as long as it isn't taking your guns? If they have facial recognition software at voting sites, who is to say they won't use it in other ways?

Just seems that your distrust of the government would be consistent, but it's not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

So you don't like gun registration because it makes it easier for the government "round up guns" but you're okay with the government having facial recognition or retinal scanning software for everyone?

Big government is okay as long as it isn't taking your guns? If they have facial recognition software at voting sites, who is to say they won't use it in other ways?

Just seems that your distrust of the government would be consistent, but it's not.

Wait...you want a gun registry?

But don't want a voter registry?

You do realize we HAVE to have a voter registry right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

The provision at the bottom seems big brotherish.

VERY VERY Much so

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

So you don't like gun registration because it makes it easier for the government "round up guns" but you're okay with the government having facial recognition or retinal scanning software for everyone?

Big government is okay as long as it isn't taking your guns? If they have facial recognition software at voting sites, who is to say they won't use it in other ways?

Just seems that your distrust of the government would be consistent, but it's not.

Not sure who the "you" here you're referring to is... I'll assume it's G5. Idk his opinion on "gun registry" I think it's not a bad idea.

A LOT of the voter measures recently, particularly the ones done IN VOTING YEARS are in fact ploys to disenfranchise certain groups... of that I have no doubt.

But, as I've said all along, you have to have ID to do ANYTHING else relating to the gov't. Anything. Not having to show your ID to vote is just silly... I don't think there is massive voter fraud going on... but to get so up in arms about having to do something you already have to do everywhere else is just stupid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

An old lady's eyes versus a program that does it electronically.

Are you concerned of your picture being stored somewhere? Like the DMV? Passport? Etc?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

How so.

If we had retinal scans think how much faster we could make the voting process. No one knows who you voted for...just you are who you say you are.

By the way...we've blown by 1984.

Retinal scanners....Seriously?

You can't talk the small Gov line and think something like that wouldn't be exploited to hell.

Same concept applies to Universal Background checks and eventual confiscation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Retinal scanners....Seriously?

You can't talk the small Gov line and think something like that wouldn't be exploited to hell.

Same concept applies to Universal Background checks and eventual confiscation.

Retinal is a heckuva lot stable and accurate than facial recognition software and less faulty. In another decade, they'll probably be on everyone's laptops for logon...like some with fingerprint swipers.

How would this be exploited?

In terms of this, what would be confiscated. Where's the harmed party. I can easily be swayed on that fact, but show the true harm. There's no invasion of privacy because your vote is still secret. Voter registration/voter record is public record. DMV already has your pics for other stuff. You refuse to get a license?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Retina scans are wonderful and there's no problems whatsoever, only the criminals need to be afraid. I don't get what you guys are so scared o-

*Obama signs a bill involving increased use of retina scans*

WAKE UP SHEEPLE! IF HITLER HAD RETINA SCANS YOU BEST BELIEVE HE'D BE USING THEM! HERE COMES OLD BIG BROTHER TO CONTROL OUR LIVES! YOU BETTER BELIEVE I'M DEFENDING ME AND MINE WHEN THEY COME FOR ME!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites