Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

North Carolina Republicans pushing bill to put two-year hold on all divorces

29 posts in this topic

Posted · Report post

Any article that starts with North Carolina Republicans is probably going to be something stupid.

[quote]
North Carolina Republican lawmakers may have abandoned their plan to declare Christianity as the state’s religion, but conservative legislators in the state are still pushing forward with a plan to require a two-year waiting period on all divorces, a plan that require the couple to attend classes and workshops designed to prevent them from divorcing.

According to the Charlotte Observer, state Senators Austin Allran (R) and Sen. Warren Daniel (R) proposed the “Healthy Marriage Act” last week, which mandates a two-year wait before judges will grant married couples a divorce, two years during which they must complete counseling courses and workshops designed to improve “communication skills” and “conflict resolution.”

Couples in the state currently face a mandatory one year wait for divorces, but the Observer reported that the lines are blurry about what constitutes the end or resumption of a relationship.


The new law would “strike from the current law a provision that says ‘isolated incidents of sexual intercourse’ don’t count against” the legal waiting period, meaning that if the court can establish that a divorcing couple has had sex, it could potentially start their waiting period over.[/quote]

[url="http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/04/06/north-carolina-republicans-pushing-bill-to-put-two-year-hold-on-all-divorces/"]http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/04/06/north-carolina-republicans-pushing-bill-to-put-two-year-hold-on-all-divorces/[/url]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

It's getting more and more ridiculous

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

More on this subject:

[quote]
But couples don't arrive at the decision to end their marriage lightly, and drawing out a divorce only throws more pain into a very deliberate decision, said Lisa Angel, a family law specialist at North Carolina's Rosen Law Firm.

"In 20 years of being a divorce attorney, I've never had a client ask for the waiting period to be longer," she said. "For most clients they have thought about this and agonized over this for years before they actually separate, so to extend that only causes more emotional and financial hardship for the family and children."

Angel said the bill's proposed reform allowing couples to continue living together during what is currently a mandatory separation poses risks for increased litigation. Current law equates a return to living under the same roof with reconciliation, Angel said, and most of the divorces she handles hinge on that definition.

The bill doesn't specify whether both spouses would have to consent to the arrangement, but Brooks said the decision would have to be mutual, and the language of the bill will be tightened as it progresses.

Those issues and the absence of exemptions for victims of domestic abuse show the bill has a long way to go, Angel said.

"Why should they participate in counseling with someone they feel puts their safety at risk?" Angel said. "I really think (the legislators) should talk to family law attorneys who are used to people going through separation and divorce."
[/quote]

http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/politics&id=9054531

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Nothing has changed from the thread last week. Its still just two legislators. I will be surprised if it makes it out of the Rules and Operations committe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I am cautiously optimistic that all these ridiculous proposed bills will come back to bite them in the next elections. No wonder why Republicans were out of power for over a century in our State. Look what they do as soon as they have a little bit of control - they poo their pants and cause our State to be national news for all the wrong reasons (national laughingstock).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Dam them for passing laws that are most desired by the majority that elected them! Dam the majority!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

That only makes it more of a national embarrassment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

[quote name='longtriad' timestamp='1365269688' post='2187758']
Dam them for passing laws that are most desired by the majority that elected them! Dam the majority!
[/quote]


Really? You "most desire" exposure of women's breasts to be a felony? For there to be a state religion (this was "only" proposed, but the point remains--this is what they are wasting everyone's time and money on)? Really? You "most desire" the bible to be in public schools?

How about doing things that help our fuging economy? How about staying out of our personal lives (religion/marriage/divorce/tits)?

I would have thought the fiscally conservative policies would have been the "most desired." Not these backwards social policies. But at least we know there is at least one person that feels the idiotic proposed bills are what they "most desire."
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

[quote name='TruthVsComfort' timestamp='1365270922' post='2187772']


Really? You "most desire" exposure of women's breasts to be a felony? For there to be a state religion (this was "only" proposed, but the point remains--this is what they are wasting everyone's time and money on)? Really? You "most desire" the bible to be in public schools?

How about doing things that help our fuging economy? How about staying out of our personal lives (religion/marriage/divorce/tits)?

I would have thought the fiscally conservative policies would have been the "most desired." Not these backwards social policies. But at least we know there is at least one person that feels the idiotic proposed bills are what they "most desire."
[/quote]
Voters. Did you vote?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Of course I voted. I am guessing most people that post in the Tinderbox vote. By spending time in this forum you are showing interest in politics/etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

[quote name='longtriad' timestamp='1365269688' post='2187758']
Dam them for passing laws that are most desired by the majority that elected them! Dam the majority!
[/quote]
What majority?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I just don't see any practical use for this. Is the court systems seriously backlogged and this would help? Uhh ok maybe.

Its frustrating because its classic majoring in the minors.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites